My first case study is on Karen Ann Quinlan, one of the first cases of euthanasia that had significantly impacted the legal debate in the United States on the right to die. Karen Ann Quinlan in April of 1975 slipped into a coma after she consumed diazepam, dextropropoxyphene, and alcohol while on a crash diet and became the center of a national debate on the definition of life and the right to die. On September 12th 1975 Karen’s father and guardian filled a suit when the doctors denied his request to remove his daughter Karen from the respirator that was sustaining her so she could die naturally with grace and dignity. The Superior Court judge Robert Muir in Morristown New Jersey, denied the parents' request on November 10th of 1975, but the…
1983 a severe car accident changed Nancy Cruzan's life forever. Nancy was found without any detectable vitals, but the ambulance was able to bring her back to stable vitals. Nancys life was changed forever , and was diagnosed with cerebral contusions compounded by significant anoxia. In other words she was in a “...persistent vegetative state…”(Rehnquist). Before this horrific accident, she had verbalized that if she were to ever be in this state that she would wish to die and to not continue with her life.…
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Quinlan’s and the settlement was permission to have the respirator removed. It was stated that someone who is terminally ill can refuse medical treatment if that is what they would have wanted. The plaintiffs were able to prove that was what Karen wanted. The Quinlan’s did decide to leave in the feeding tube. An unexpected outcome was that she breathed on her own for many years.…
Death With Dignity: A Commentary Sergej Jagodin Millersville University Medical Aid in Dying: A Commentary The ability to choose when to die is not a topic that is heavily discussed throughout a person’s life. What constitutes dying early and on one’s own terms? Is it moral? Is it right?…
Missouri Department of Health, established a patient's right to be taken off life support" (Van Biema 1-2). The Cruzan v Missouri DHS case revolved around the removal of life support system from a young woman who was virtually dead although she did have active brain waves. Her body was unable to breathe, establish a heartbeat or maintain waste removal on its own. Miss Cruzan was being sustained in life only by the means of a machine.…
Life Support? On February 25th, 1990 a 26 year old woman fell into cardiac arrest in her Florida home. This woman named Terri Schiavo would launch one of the most significant arguments on life and death pertaining to life support. After suffering through cardiac arrest Terri’s brain was damaged enough to cause PVS or Persistent Vegetative State, in which she could still breath and her heart still beat but she was kept alive by feeding tube.…
You hear screaming in a hospital room. As you peer into the room, you can see a young lady going through extreme pain. Should that person have the right to end her pain with her own hands, or should she continue to fight through it? As the current technology continues to progress, more and more things that were not once possible are now becoming a reality. This is true for the medical field as well.…
The Terri Schiavo case gained national awareness on when and how the law defines death. Terri Shiavo had a fatal cardiac arrest that left her in a “vegetated state,” in other words the brain tissue had died due to lack of oxygen. Since the patient was married and in this state for 15 years, the patient’s husband had petitioned the courts to stop nutritional feedings and allow the patient to die. Firmly against this decision, the parents of the patient, fought the husband in court for the right to continue tube feedings, citing that it is unethical to withhold food and water. The husband claimed that Terri Shaivo made a statement about not living on life support should the worst happened.…
If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…
Recent trends indicate that more people are wanting to spend their last moments in life at home and not at hospital. End of life care is moving towards nursing homes, homes, and hospice care. End-of-life care is an issue that most are going to have to face as they become old. First thing to member is to support the client’s decision and provide them with the information needed to make an informed decision regarding their care. I would inform them of their options regarding benefits and hindrance of their choices.…
Introduction Today’s societies are developing at a faster rate than thought humanly possible with new technological and medical advancements unearthed each day. Despite such progress, however, the world today is advancing, many regions of the world still struggle with an archaic controversy that has plagued mankind for centuries. Physician assisted suicide is the doctoral practice of intentionally providing someone with the means to commit suicide. This is includes, but is not limited to, the administration of lethal drugs or the allocation of knowledge to commit suicide.…
The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…
In this essay, Steinbock tries to refute the claims about euthanasia presented by James Rachels, and tries to show how Rachel’s misinterpreted the American Medical Association 's doctrine regarding euthanasia. Steinbock states that contrary to Rachel’s interpretation, the AMA does not endorse any type of euthanasia, and that the termination of life is never the goal in a professional medical practice. Steinbock argues that Rachel 's error in his essay was the linkage of ending “extraordinary care” and passive euthanasia. Steinbock says that stoppage of extraordinary care or treatment that would prolong one 's life and creates burden for that patient is not always linked to the intention of death. Steinbock says “there can be a point (to the cessation of life-prolonging treatment) other than an endeavor to bring about the patient’s death,” Steinbock continues to provide examples where withholding treatment does not necessarily mean that this decision was made for the cession of life.…
Place yourself in the shoes of Joseph and Joyce Cruzan, your daughter (Nancy Cruzan) has been in an accident was declared dead only to be relieved that she would be in a “vegetable” state on life support for seven years. How could the parents of Nancy Cruzan come to grips with the choice of ending her life, after all Nancy had said that if she was to be found in that state that should would prefer the right to die. Not only being anguished with making the decision of going to end their daughter’s life, but being denied by the hospital prompted the Cruzan’s to debate in court. Several emotional cases such as the “Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health” have prompted the Right to die clause stating that an individual should be able…
Throughout the years, our ethical values have changed dependent on the state of patients receiving artificial life aid. Many factors, including health status, influence physician choices, statistics of survival and the surrogates consent of termination. If doctors and surrogates disagree over the probability of survival, patients may stay in a persistent vegetative state. This conflict happens very frequently in the medical field and is often taken to court, even to the federal level: supreme court. Surrogates and physicians are often divided between the right to live and the right to die.…