Ethics In The Emperor's Club

One of the more boggling notions in ethics is the verdict between what is bad and good. One of the viewpoints posits that good and bad is correlative and it depends on the perception. What might be normal for the spider is a chaos for the fly. It is a notion between harm and help. Doing harm to a side just for the other to benefit is tolerable as the outcome is considered as dynamic to all. The product will always give reason for the development. A temptation to help those in need will always lead to lashing out those who performed well. Sacrificing, in the end, will constantly contribute to both sides and it is inclusive to all aspects of reality. The ends will always justify the mean. As seen in the movie The Emperor’s Club, it illustrates the spar of the two concepts. Mr. Hundert gave up Blythe for Bell to reach the peak. He changed the mark of Bell’s paperwork. Mr. Hundert’s commiseration towards Bell led to his actions. Mr. Hundert was inevitably misrepresented for Bell committed an unethical act. Bell cheated during the competition in his prep year and adulthood. Generally, it avows that everybody must be subjected to adequate treatment. The deed on Blythe by Mr. Hundert’s decision is considered depraved based on merits because Mr. Hundert sacrificed him just to save the “lost sheep”. Blythe was …show more content…
The absolute law must set us all free from all circumstances and contexts. Everything that might interrogate ethics can be solved using the absolute law such as the general problem, “Is it permissible to consciously and intentionally harm an individual or a larger number of people especially in cases that offer no alternatives in achieving the goal.” It is affirmative as long as the end is dynamic, for the greater good, justifies itself, and uses the absolute law. To reiterate, love is categorically good and whatever loving thing to do is the right thing to