Emmeline Pankhurst On Women's Suffrage

Emmeline Pankhurst enforced an argument, where women suffrage has reached a substantial point where she will speak out for women to have rights. She covers herself how women have very little to no freedom. Secondary she uses outside sources to show that revolution will be possible with historical events from the past, this should blow a very powerful message because the use of historical events can satisfy one side’s defense. She included the differences between freedom men have compared to women, question why women are human beings yet being mistreated for their gender. These are the base of the argument how Emmeline Pankhurst builds her argument about women's suffrage. Emmeline Pankhurst shows a piece of her life as where she decided to speak her voice out, but was denied due to her gender. Her experience involves her adjudged as a dangerous person due to the fact she is a female in society trying to gain rights that men have. In fair sense, this is a violation to the law where people have the freedom they deserve for being a human being, however her discussion about how women have been treated clearly …show more content…
She points out the types of revolution that can take place, where either peaceful or violently, but in full regards that the situation finalizes that the revolution were a success. She points out big leaders who can add this law, and points out how overthrowing a nation is not easy, but very possible with supporters who agree to revise the legislator seat for leaders who deserve high power. To summarise this part of the argument, she claims that the revolution will succeed no matter the cost, due to historical events where revolutions took place, she shows how women will get their rights the way historical revolutions took