Immanuel Kant And Duty Essay

Better Essays
How is it that people are to follow through with something without considering the consequences? Immanuel Kant argues that we as people should not act for reasons because if we do, we will be self-contradicting ourselves. He believes that we are being morally irrelevant if we base are wrong doings or right doings with consequences before we choose to do the action. He believes we should be willing to accomplish our duties and tasks without worrying about the aftermath of an action. Kant believes it should be a requirement for us to obey the moral law because it is a noble thing to do. Kant does not believe in lying or doing evil, but he does believe in good will. Even if lying will help save a person’s life, Kant still insists that you should not lie because he believes that both a good lie and a bad lie should be prohibited. Kant deals with deontological ethics which is based on ethics out of a sense of duty or obligation. When it comes to good will we are to recognize what our duty is in life, we are to complete that duty, and we must be willing to do what is right no matter the situation.
“The source of this upgrading process is the human
…show more content…
Kant requests for people to pursue their duty because it is their duty. “Act of that maxim which can at the same time have for its object itself as a universal law of nature” (Perry 533). Kant is stating that if you are the only person that can complete the task or duty then you should not do it. He does not want us doing things like committing suicide because that is not consider a good duty and he does not want people doing things that cannot be consist of as a universal duty. Kant wants us to realize that we should only complete a task or duty if we approve that other people can do it as well. Kant is hinting to us that we are not the only individuals in this world so we should think and act more universally than

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This is why Kant thinks you cannot measure the morality of an action by its outcome. He believed that the good intentions we have to execute an action is what really matters. In his theory he stated that we should treat…

    • 3463 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kantian ethics is a form of deontological ethics, meaning evaluating actions to see whether they are morally just or not. Kantian ethics is a type of deontological ethics because it is the view that we have absolute moral duties that are determined by reason and not affected by the consequences. Valjean, if shown from this view, would turn himself in. He would know that it would be morally wrong to lie and that lying is never justified, even if the townspeople have prospered so much under his ruling. He would know that morality must be grounded in reason and that an innocent man must not be put away for an action Valjean himself has committed.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Whether we feel against or not we know the morally right thing and it’s our duty to care out our action. Apart from what is in the sense of good will nothing else is considered to be good. He says that when guided to do what’s good in by morality there is no seeking for the reward. The simple reward is doing the right thing. When based off of feelings as for a reward for doing the right thing then it is not morality.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Everything should be taken on a case-by-case basis and by using the model of the moral man one is able to do this. Consequentially, Aristotle’s ethics would say not to get into the experience machine. The experience machine allows one to choose specific experiences they want to have but the person is plugged into a machine to experience it virtually. This would go against Aristotle’s ethics because one must do the right thing for the same reasons as the ethical man. Even…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to Kant in order for an action to have moral worth, there must be an act of right motivation, along with doing the right thing; if the act has moral worth it must be done in a sense of obligation to do the right thing. There can be good actions done with wrong motives, making them not have moral worth. “I ought never to act except in such a way that…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1 Kant would reject the charge, “bottom line, humans are nothing more than insignificant creatures with an animal nature.” This is because Kant believes that human beings are rational and act in accordance with moral principles. The categorical imperative, which is the moral law dictated by reason, is binding on all rational beings. He argues that rational beings cannot be treated as means to an end because they are ends in themselves. This requires respecting their reasoned motives. This is derived from his claim that reason motivates morality and demands respect for reason as a motive for all human beings.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I do not see humans capable of alienating all the natural inclinations they experience in order to perform an act out of pure duty. It is a part of human nature to assign affection, love, anger, etc., to the people and things they encounter during their life. Kant regards emotions as irrelevant and the fact that the only appropriate motive for moral action is a sense of duty creates a conflict with our instincts of emotion that accompany our daily actions. We also may doubt whether it is even possible for us to set aside our self-interest and the concerns and desires that make us individuals, and to think of ourselves, as Kant wants us to, as purely rational autonomous beings that subdue our desires and inclinations in order to act only out of duty. I believe that by removing these natural emotions we experience from performing a moral act it takes away from the value.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Act so that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an ends and never as a means only” According to Kant, we should obey this categorical imperative because this itself proposes an end.In here he does not refer to the “end” as something you want to achieve or get, but as something why we act. To treat human being as ends rather than merely means means to to love my neighbor as myself has to be an end in itself and not a means to achieve what suits me better. Our ultimate goal should be the concern for humanity and not for personal interest or benefit. Thus, taken to humanity and our actions in favor of it as an end and not a means to achieve our goals. Kant thinks that human beings are ends in themselves because respect is based on our ability to reason; we have unconditional…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, in Kant’s theory, we can see the argument among duty and self-interest. The philosopher Immanuel Kant believes that people should be treated as ends in themselves and not treated as means. The reason is that people have value in life and should be respected. He believes that human will always be valued depend on the fact that they are human not because of any other reason.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Being A Moral Saint

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If we follow reason, we have the perfect duty or a clear way of fulfilling to be a moral saint. Cultivating your talents would be your imperfect duty or an unclear way of fulfilling. Wolf disagrees with this point. It should be up to us if we want to cultivate our talents or not; these non-moral excellences could lead to happiness. However, Kant believes that happiness is not a rational purpose in life.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays