Immanuel Kant And Duty Essay

Superior Essays
How is it that people are to follow through with something without considering the consequences? Immanuel Kant argues that we as people should not act for reasons because if we do, we will be self-contradicting ourselves. He believes that we are being morally irrelevant if we base are wrong doings or right doings with consequences before we choose to do the action. He believes we should be willing to accomplish our duties and tasks without worrying about the aftermath of an action. Kant believes it should be a requirement for us to obey the moral law because it is a noble thing to do. Kant does not believe in lying or doing evil, but he does believe in good will. Even if lying will help save a person’s life, Kant still insists that you should not lie because he believes that both a good lie and a bad lie should be prohibited. Kant deals with deontological ethics which is based on ethics out of a sense of duty or obligation. When it comes to good will we are to recognize what our duty is in life, we are to complete that duty, and we must be willing to do what is right no matter the situation.
“The source of this upgrading process is the human
…show more content…
Kant requests for people to pursue their duty because it is their duty. “Act of that maxim which can at the same time have for its object itself as a universal law of nature” (Perry 533). Kant is stating that if you are the only person that can complete the task or duty then you should not do it. He does not want us doing things like committing suicide because that is not consider a good duty and he does not want people doing things that cannot be consist of as a universal duty. Kant wants us to realize that we should only complete a task or duty if we approve that other people can do it as well. Kant is hinting to us that we are not the only individuals in this world so we should think and act more universally than

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    You are not allowed to make exceptions for yourself. For example, if you expect other people to keep their promises, then you are obligated to keep your own promises. If we apply Kant’s theory in social terms, it emphasizes on the respect for the person because each person has moral dignity. Therefore, no person could exclusively treat another as a means to his/her own end. One must make the right decisions for the right reasons.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Universal Law Case Study

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages

    People can not violate the human rights or deprive themselves because people consider helping others is not their business. My conclusion is that Kant has a clear idea of how to question ourselves about this simple actions. To be responsible for our own body, life, welfare, happiness and also to be honest, to be a man of honor, and to help others to succeed in life. At the end of the day, we all are human beings striving to survive and pursuing happiness.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, if a person is doing something for the consequence that such an acting may brought they he/she is doing it for the wrong reasons. According to Kant the only thing “good without limitation is a good will that performs actions solely for sake of duty”(compare to utilitarians). Therefore, acting for sake of duty tells you are being…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An Exploration of Othello: Delving into the Mind Frame of Desdemona and Iago Immanuel Kant’s view on ethics and morality is that in order to determine if we are acting in a fashion that can be deemed moral, we have not only a duty to ourselves but others. It is duty that determines our actions. Kant establishes certain limitations and restrictions upon the notion of duty, narrowing down a definition which would allow us to therefore be able to readily distinguish “whether the action which agrees with duty is done from duty, or from a selfish view” (Kant 2). In order to figure out whether our actions correspond to this concept of duty, Kant has established what is known as the categorical imperative which states that you should reflect upon your actions and be comfortable with them becoming a universal law. Insofar as duty is concerned, if we follow this principle it allows for a broader understanding of what is meant by moral and ethical behaviour.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By failing to adhere to one’s wishes, we are in fact, violating the basis of Kant’s…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    never lie) in certain circumstances may not be seen as ‘morally wrong’ for example if we take the case scenario of lying to a kidnapper, is this seen as morally wrong? Thus are our actions justified as right or wrong based on the condition and the person we are lying to? This contradicts Kant’s principle as one is not being treated an end within themselves but rather as a mean. As lying to a kidnapper is not wrong since the kidnapper is portrayed as the ‘negative’ character, thus they do not have dignity, kidnappers are not rational beings so they don’t deserve to be treated as an end in the kingdom of ends. Kant would argue that we are ‘morally responsible for the consequences of lying but we are not responsible for telling the truth’, thus lying on the basis of consequences is irrational as consequences are out of our control, when one choses to lie we are responsible for lying no matter the circumstances or the character of the person we are lying to.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Duty

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Immanuel Kant’s Classic Work Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals “outlines a rationalist ethical system centered in the notion of the categorical imperative as the fundamental principle of action” (Pojman and Tramel 218). The excerpt we read The Foundation of Ethics focuses on what gives an action moral worth, Kant argues that only if we act out of a sense of duty do we find a true sense of moral worth. I find this claim to be a very interesting one because I have never thought about how duty not in the sense that everyone thinks of duty but in the way that Kant defines it, gives us our sense of moral worth or moral credit for an action that is performed. I always look at it as we preformed based on the values that were instilled on us…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant On Direct Duty

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant asks his readers to live through the terms of direct and indirect duties. A direct duty is an obligation from being to another based on what that being is. An indirect duty is an obligation to something as a result of a direct duty. A real life example that portrays this system would go as follows: a man has a direct duty to another human, Sally, but because she is a self-conscious human. This same man, Erik, does not have a direct duty to sally’s cat, Bons.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Kant

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    And, to act out of respect for the Moral Law is to do the right thing because it is the right. Again, what Kant thinks is important from the moral point of view is the motive of the agent. To see how motive is important to Kant (and to see what it means to say that one is acting from duty), it is useful to look at the various ways one can act in accordance with duty (and thus perform the right action).…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals, and Mill’s Utilitarianism, each offer different arguments about what is morality. They both give us fundamental and universal theories about morality. Before we compare the two, let’s first start with a summary of the main arguments of each philosopher. Mill begins chapter one by setting the stage for what he is going to discuss. Philosophers have discussed the foundation of morality for more than two thousand years.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant imposes the idea of the “purity of the will” which expands on the principle that one should act…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays