Universal Law Case Study

Good Essays
1. Explanation of Kant’s 4 Cases
FIRST CASE: A person with many problems is tired of life. However, his reason is still intact that he can inquire himself about the possibility to commit suicide. Next, he asks himself if his action could become a universal law of nature, meaning other people in the same situation will follow the same rule. His rule of conduct states that because staying alive will bring more harm than contentment, and because he loves himself, he decided to take his own life. The question is that the love for himself can be considered a universal law of nature? No, because the decision is made based on his own feelings, on his own particular perception of his own life. This situation cannot be considered as a universal law
…show more content…
A person in need does not have any excuse to lie and promise something that will never comply in order to get assistance. There are two issues here. First, not telling the true to receive favors is against good will. Also, cheating to get benefits is another way to commit fraud. Second, giving your word is considered more than a signed written contract. It is worst when the person knows that is unable to keep the promise. When applying the categorical imperative rule, asking if this could be a universal law of nature, the answer is no, because the person is using lies and false promises to receive a benefit and is taking advantage of the other …show more content…
A person that lives in abundance, or has a privileged life is morally obligated to help others, assisting in every aspect that is able to. It is true that every person is free. But we all know that there are circumstances out of our control that make us more vulnerable. The people that are in the position to help others should be held accountable for their welfare. If we ask the question about helping others is a universal law of nature, the answer is yes. People can not violate the human rights or deprive themselves because people consider helping others is not their business.
My conclusion is that Kant has a clear idea of how to question ourselves about this simple actions. To be responsible for our own body, life, welfare, happiness and also to be honest, to be a man of honor, and to help others to succeed in life. At the end of the day, we all are human beings striving to survive and pursuing happiness. If we all take the time to inquire ourselves this simple question, every time we have to make a decision, wether it is or is it not this action a universal law of nature. Eventually, we will become better human beings. We all should remember that takes a village to raise a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Promisees cannot contain the end of the actions of deceitful promisors because the promisors’s transparency prevents promisees from being reasoners (4:430). There is one end that promisors have that promisees absolutely cannot have themselves—namely, the end of being treated merely as a means (4:430). Hence, promisees cannot contain that promisors are subordinating the value of their humanity to their own self-interest. Promisors are subordinating promisees’s humanity because they are using it merely as a tool of conditional value from self-interest. Deception is not the problem, rather, it is the failure of having mutual consent of deception.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Separateness Of Persons

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rawls and Nozick argue that utilitarianism does not consider that beings are individuals in their own right and “does not take seriously the distinction between persons”. Utilitarianism focuses solely on achieving maximal total utility. In order to do this, it sacrifices an even distribution of utility and ‘sanctions injustice’. It directs us to act unjustly to a few in order to achieve happiness on a larger scale- failing to respect individuals needs and rights. According to Nozick this notion is flawed as “to use a person [for another’s benefit] does not sufficiently respect and take account of the fact that he is a separate person, that his is the only life he has.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When rational beings pursue their objectives, they must always view themselves not only as means to some purpose but also ends in themselves. In addition, rational beings must also treat their peers as ends in themselves. Hence, the second formulation of categorical imperative is as follows: “Act so that you use humanity as much in your own person as in the person of every other, always at the same time as end and never merely as means.” . Kant’s example of helping others in need is consistent with the second formulation of the law. A view of humanity as end in itself requires people to strive towards maximum happiness for humanity, thus people must take care of other people for the welfare of the humanity.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Divine Command Theory

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Squirrel stop! This nihilistic view that you have adopted can be even more dangerous than Divine Command Theory. To live one’s life with the belief that there are no moral truths can be dangerous. The metaethical view that I agree with is known as Cultural Relativism. This view states that “moral standards are relative to cultures or societies.” (Shafer-Landau, 293) I like this view because I believe that people should be able to live their lives according to their own moral standards.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This right is an opportunity to be happy in what you do without holding back and without caring about what others do. With all three different freedoms together holds great responsibility and trust. People should be able to say what they want to say, do what they want to do, and believe in what they want to believe in, as long as it causes no harm. This sort of freedom becomes a moral responsibility as it holds great power. For the span of mankind, humans have still yet to solve this unanswered puzzle of how to please everyone while maintaining control in the community.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant believes it should be a requirement for us to obey the moral law because it is a noble thing to do. Kant does not believe in lying or doing evil, but he does believe in good will. Even if lying will help save a person’s life, Kant still insists that you should not lie because he believes that both a good lie and a bad lie should be prohibited. Kant deals with deontological ethics which is based on ethics out of a sense of duty or obligation. When it comes to good will we are to recognize what our duty is in life, we are to complete that duty, and we must be willing to do what is right no matter the situation.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He suggested that people should act according to good will without considering consequences and other things in life. In other words, human should always be good. Not agreeing with his ideas, Aristotle believes that happiness is the most important thing that one should strive for in one’s life. As he said “happiness is apparently something complete and self-sufficient, since it is the end of the things achievable in action.” (Aristotle, p.8). He believes that happiness is the best good of life and we all ultimately seek for it.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The beginning of state of nature meaning war. Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14).…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Introduction on Ethical Egoism: A rear assumption is that the needs and happiness of other people will always effects on our moral ethics. If we accept this assumption, we think that our moral ethics are balancing our self-interest against that of others. It is true, that “What is morally right or wrong depends not only on how it makes us feel, but also how it affects others”. The idea of each person ought to pursue his or her own self -interest exclusively to do in his life time for others is known as Ethical Egoism.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Half-truths are lies– In connection with the second application is the use of half-truths. Half-truths are distorted truths, making them a lie. It doesn’t matter what your end goal is, never use shortcuts when telling the truth. 4. Be truthful to yourself – People, when consumed by their desire to feel happiness, resort to rationalization, denial or repression when in stressful situations.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays