The Doctrine Of Force Majeure Definition

Improved Essays
B. The Doctrine of Force Majeure

This doctrine means that there is an avoidable occurrence that is normally cannot be avoided ("Force Majeure"). This simply means that nobody is exempted, therefore it is applicable most especially to all health care providers. The unforeseen or unpredicted situations can be brought by natural calamities such as fire, floods and earthquake and some situations that are defined and included to the doctrine of Force Majeure ("What Is Force Majeure? | Law Teacher"). In the event that these calamities happened in a health care set up, the staff are not and will not be hold liable and accountable to its result. Force Majeure clause, it is part and usually included in a certain work contract that explains about setting
…show more content…
There is a high probability rate of committing negligence most especially in a health care set up so it is an advantage and needed that all of the health care providers will be well educated and knowledgeable about this. There are three scenarios and circumstances wherein a health care providers negligence can be proven even without a specific conduct or processes. First, is that patient does not normally got injured most especially within the health institution vicinity, unless there is really a negligent in the part of the health provider. Second, the injury that the patient got is because of an agency which the defendant is in control of. Third, scenarios wherein the complainant personally did not perform anything that can cause the injury. If all of the evidences that will be presented into the court will consists of all the mentioned factors, then, the defendant will be proven guilty of the act of negligence. Additionally, this doctrine eliminates the need of an expert testimony but does not absolve the complainant from anything. Let's take as an example the patient that went under surgery, like any other surgeries patient must be under anesthetic beforehand. So say for instance, the patient's nerve on his/her arm become damaged, though it is actually not part of the procedure and because of many medical practitioners that are present in the room, he/she do not know who caused the damaged. In this situation, a res ipsa loquitur can be applied to the claim or

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis Paper Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002) No 2001-CA-00117-SCT Jonathan R. Heshler California University of Pennsylvania NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the case of Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002). This civil case involved a female patient (Gwendolyn Wilkes) presenting to the emergency room at Boliver County Hospital, being misdiagnosed and discharged by Dr. Dorrough, dying the next day at another hospital after emergency surgery and the patients husband and son bringing a wrongful death medical malpractice action suit forth.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rule of Law To prove causation, the Barneses had to establish that but for the negligence of the defendant, the injury would not have occurred. Jacobs v. Flynn, 131 Md. App. 342, 354 (2000). Because of the complex nature of medical malpractice cases, expert testimony is normally required to establish breach of the standard of care and causation. Id.(Barnes v. GBMC) Dr. Marion Lamonte…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But the hospital argued that Dr. Graybeal wasn’t their employee. And they weren’t in control of what done by Dr.Graybeal. To be an employee or servant of the hospital, the hospital must be in charge of the work their employee has done. Therefore, the doctor’s negligent wasn’t their responsibility. Whereas, plaintiff argued, when they were in the ER room, and the attending physician took care of them, no matter who was in charge of the authorities, the hospital should be liable since it was underdetermined and mistreated by one of its…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Vs Brock Case Study

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A civil suit is commonly derived from a private party or individual, who alleges damages from duty of care. Once a civil case begins, it is the duty of the plaintiff to prove, with evidence, duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Conversely, the defendant must prove their affirmative defense against documented allegations. The Oliver versus Brock case proves the importance of supporting evidence as opposed to hearsay statements, to prove the truth of the matter. In the Oliver versus Brock case, Cathy (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Bryan Whitfield Memorial Hospital of Demopolis and the treating physicians Dr. F.S. Whitfield, Dr. Paul Ketcham and Dr. E.C. Brock (Defendant) for negligence of care.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perin V Hayne Case Study

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Res ipsa loquitar according to the legal dictionary is “a rebuttal presumption or inference that the defendant was negligent, which arises…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is supported by the reading, “…to conduct oneself as a reasonably prudent person would in similar circumstances. A breach of duty imposes liability if it results in injury to property or another person” (Showalter, 2017, pg. 141). The case involving Norton vs. Argonaut Insurance Co. has me inclined to believe that an emphasis must be placed on hospital patient safety, in order to force the courts to recognize and implement a stricter regime designed to make nurses and staff evaluate and question medication protocols and orders and if warranted, have the right to refuse to administer a drug. In retrospect, nurses and hospital staff could find themselves frequently named in civil litigation suits involving medication errors, a hospital safety issue plaguing a great number of nurses and other medical staff in every patient care setting. With regards to these and other changes that need to take place, nursing boards will need to protect patients as well as nurses by guaranteeing that regulations governing nursing responsibilities are consistent with any expanded definition of a nurse’s role as implemented by the courts currently or in the future.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Expert witnesses are a crucial and frequently required factor in most civil cases. An expert can be an important part of many aspect in either the prosecution or defense’s case. An expert can be utilized to introduce the evidence through their own testimonials but their role does not end there. As Douglas Heist stated expert witnesses are useful “in the development, evaluation and preparation of the defense or prosecution of a case (2010).” In most malpractice cases expert witnesses are necessary, doctors and health care professionals are needed to establish standard of care.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pbins 401 Assignment

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The term negligence would apply in a situation where someone did not use the level of care or skills that another would ordinarily have used in a similar situation (Phillips, 2013). Alternatively, malpractice is considered the “careless performance of duty” and requires that the expected delivery of a level of care equal to educational capability, a deviation from that training occurred and someone was directly harmed by the action or inaction which was incongruent with training received to perform the duty (Phillips, 2013, p. 39). Moral Principles in Decision Making A way to guide our ethical practice is essential.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negligence is consider tort and is a civil wrong committed against the person that the court remedies in the form of action for damages occurred such compensation. Negligence is the unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do. It is a form of conduct which is caused by the carelessness of the standard of care on reasonable members of the society; In the medical field it is consider malpractice. The person who shows negligence does not use their best judgment against possible risk. For example, in the case Dr. Haskins did not examine Kelly nor review his chart.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nysha Moore Negligent Drug Overdose 1. Describe the elements that the plaintiff’s attorney had to establish under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Res ipsa loquitur is a legal doctrine that shifts the burden of proof in a negligence case from the plaintiff to the defendant (Pozgar & Santucci, 2015, p. 156, para. 12). The American translation is “the thing speaks for itself” (Pozgar & Santucci, 2015, p. 156, para. 12). Under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, the plaintiff must be able to prove all 3 elements in order to shift the blame to the defendant.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Summary

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A person can be held liable for failure “to act affirmatively” to remove potential risk. The overall duty of care placed on an individual includes not putting others at risk by allowing them to be exposed to a potentially dangerous situation.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How Can the Best Personal Injury Attorney Help You on Your Medical Malpractice Suit? The best personal injury lawyers will tell you that the most common criminal issues that occurs in a hospital and any healthcare facility is medical negligence. This is a situation where the medical staff have made a mistake and it does not necessarily mean that a case can be made when it has resulted in death only. It could be a situation where the medical history of the patient was not done diligently and the medication that was subscribed has resulted in a deadly injury of the victim and could result in death.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the unfortunate case of Canterbury versus Spence, had the patient believed he was properly informed about the procedure, there likely would not have been a suit. Not only do patients suffer when they are ill informed of the procedure they will undergo, but doctors face many consequences when the information provided is lacking or misunderstood. Doctors are constantly made to fear that the patient will seek legal retribution when outcomes are unexpected; the threat of a malpractice or negligence suit is constantly looming about. “Failure by a doctor to properly provide the…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical Malpractice Case

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Medical Malpractice Why it went to court. Mary Carnahan HA 210 Medical Law and Ethics October 31, 2014 Introduction We are going to take a medical malpractice case that went to court. Research the case to see why it went to court. I chose a medical malpractice case from Phoenixville, PA.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the U.S., the third leading cause of death is not a topic the general public knows and talks about: medical mistakes. According to the Journal of Patient Safety, between 210,000 and 440,000 patients suffer some type of harm. The medical system should change so there are more people double-checking every detail, the hours of doctors shifts are reduced and the topic of medical malpractice is openly discussed. In life or death situations, every small detail needs to be checked and double checked to reduce the likelihood of error. There are far too many examples where negligence by any of the medical staff has led to a patient suffering the consequences.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays