In the first study, she made 4 different age groups: 1, 3, 4, and 5 year olds, and then showed them picture books that had realistic pictures of an animal they had never seen before. Then they were split into two groups. The first group heard realistic, factual language; the other group heard anthropomorphized language. In the second study, everything was kept the same, except this time the children saw anthropomorphized pictures of the animals. Results demonstrated that depending on the language used in the books, children had differing tendencies to characterize animals in a human-like way. More specifically, the younger children, who read the anthropomorphic storybooks, were affected in their learning about the animals because of the illustrations. This implicates that anthropomorphizing animals skews learning in children and also influences their knowledge of animals, which is not as positive of an impact as
In the first study, she made 4 different age groups: 1, 3, 4, and 5 year olds, and then showed them picture books that had realistic pictures of an animal they had never seen before. Then they were split into two groups. The first group heard realistic, factual language; the other group heard anthropomorphized language. In the second study, everything was kept the same, except this time the children saw anthropomorphized pictures of the animals. Results demonstrated that depending on the language used in the books, children had differing tendencies to characterize animals in a human-like way. More specifically, the younger children, who read the anthropomorphic storybooks, were affected in their learning about the animals because of the illustrations. This implicates that anthropomorphizing animals skews learning in children and also influences their knowledge of animals, which is not as positive of an impact as