Today, local community taxes are responsible for a majority of costs regarding school facilities--42% of operating costs including staffing and 82% of capital costs including buildings, facilities, and equipment (Filardo, 2016). However, this funding mechanism proves to be problematic as we consider that decades of state sanctioned discriminatory housing policies from racial segregation to redlining and predatory lending have had an intergenerational sorting effect on neighborhoods. Such policies pushed lower income and populations of color/ethnic minorities to become concentrated in disinvested low resourced neighborhoods while predominantly white, higher income populations select in to higher resourced neighborhoods. As a result, resources dedicated per student can vary vastly depending on where the student …show more content…
In response to nation-wide recessions, poorer districts have had to face budget cuts and continue to further spread their resources thin among their schools’ staff, programs and infrastructure that play a critical role in being able to uphold quality standards of school wellness and enrich their students educational experience. A concerning observation is that while affluent school districts invest highly in enhancements including performing arts centers, kitchen infrastructure, labs, recreational facilities, and school gardens, low income districts require the funding for overdue basic infrastructure repairs such as asbestos removal or new roofs instead of maintaining the necessary staffing, programs and amenities needed to meet basic school wellness policies regarding nutrition and physical education (Smith,