Difference Between Socrates And Crito

Prior to Socrates’ execution, his companion, Crito spent quality time with him, having a conversation of whether or not Socrates should escape from prison. Socrates was trying to distinguish between what was considered moral and what was immoral, while Crito was constantly pressing him into fleeing. As he was comparing the different choices, Socrates used his abilities of critical thinking and wisdom to determine the right course of action. After much examination, Socrates eventually decided to stay back and await his execution. As he anticipates his death, Socrates narrates that, “the most important thing in life is not life. But the good life…” (Crito, 48b) He strongly believes that there is no purpose in living if his life is not consisted if moral and justice. According to Socrates and his beliefs, breaking out of the confinement would be deliberated as an unjust and immoral action. No matter what the situation the individual was currently in, living the just life was correspondent to the Athenian laws. Socrates didn’t want to disobey the laws of Athens due to his immense respect for the city and its laws. Living by such laws allowed him to lead “the good …show more content…
For Socrates, the “good life” is seen as using his times to strive for perfection and educating to any person who is willing to listen to what he learned from his pursuit. As Crito made his dispute that it is not right for his friend to abandon a lifetime that can definitely be protected, Socrates responded that life itself is not valuable. One must strive to attain the good life. At all costs, it is not moral to be desirous for life. Certain things are worth dying for, with accordance to his views. Remaining authentic and faithful to your beliefs is considerably better than living a life in which you have to give up your ideals. Hence, Socrates articulates that it is probable to live a quality life in