Determinism Vs Free Will Analysis

Decent Essays
When we hear the word “will”, first thing which arises in our mind is my choice. In our society, humans are involved by freedom but all the laws and rules have limited are freedom to a level. Tough not much freedom in many things but we do have freewill. Many philosophers have claimed that we should do what we actually want to do, which means that we should obey our freewill. In contrast, Sam Harris objected about the real concept of freewill. Harris is a neuroscientist and he believes that there is no such thing as freedom. According to him our brain acts upon our sub-conscious activities and human are just a puppet to their brain. As much as it sounds disturbing, it is a fact to some degree. In the book “free will” he explained that our …show more content…
In many cases freewill is very vital part of our society, without freewill it would be hard to hold anyone in charge of their activities. Few philosophers argued in contradiction of freewill with the concept of determinism. Determinism considers that there is a cause behind all “event” and the “event” is referred as our movements. So basically, every event happens can neither be stopped nor can be caused randomly. Determinism is an opposed of freewill, in which every action is prearranged by past. The problem with this policy is that no one could be blame for their action whether it’s good or bad-since everything is prearranged. Determinism falls into two further categories: hard determinism and soft determinism. It also means that freewill is predetermine too. Unlike determinism freewill is a very important factor for taking concern, which can create a dilemma in society to punish or praise anyone for his or her actions. Sam Harris also proved this with his mri test which showed that our action is a result of our subconscious and every human’s acts in a different way due to their personal life understandings. We can’t think like offenders because we have never lived their life because no one becomes criminal in just one …show more content…
I do agree because freewill is define as a freedom of making any decision but our choices are narrow because of the laws and rules of society. Any decision we make is reflection of past. It’s hard to say that our choice exclusively comes from our mind. We are programmed to think in a certain way. For instance, humans cannot control their feelings over many things. I have seen many people trying to drop weight but they end up eating unhealthy food, which gives me a pure idea that our mind is not under our control. I still think that we are responsible for our every action, which means we can control our desire for certain things but that, would not be our choice then. Many of us think that we have a control above our body but can we stop developing? The answer is no. In reality we don’t even have control over our body or mind. The only thing we can do is selecting to take correct action by bearing in mind the penalties. Though one can debate that we are not force to make any decisions but this is not true. Every day of lives we are force to make decisions on daily basis. Such as, going to school, eating, sleeping and many more. We don’t even have a right to deprive our body for

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Freedom Vs Determinism

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If you wanted to argue about indeterminism which is that everything we do is random but still lacks freedom of will. These types of arguments go back to ancient times and are still being argued to this day. Psychologists who agree with free will view believe that determinism removes freedom and devalues our lives.Deterministic psychology doesn’t understand the amazing qualities of human beings and our freedom to choose our own…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Holbach states that it is not free will that causes you to perform an action, but it is his desire or motive which decides to perform an action. Meaning, the reason you decided to perform an action was to convince your opponent. The desire to convince your opponent was what made you perform your action instead of free will where your desires were created from temperament which is out of your control. All motives and ideas originate from your temperament which was created by laws nature created that you must obey without your consent, therefore you cannot do not have any free will on your motives, ideas, and desires. People believe that they are a free agent because they fail to understand the true motive that causes one to perform an action.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essay On Indeterminism

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Schlick agreed with the mainstream compatibilists that freedom means the opposite of compulsion. He theorized that there are internal constraints that act on our ability to act of our own free will. These internal constraints such as mental illness and neuroses prevent us from making rational decisions of our own free will and this leads us back to the theory of determinism. If an action is the result of deeply disturbed irrational desires, then it is not accurate to say that the action is free. Therefore we cannot hold the individual responsible for his or her…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some people may go ahead and steal to stay alive while others may choose to act differently and do the complete opposite. Your actions solely depend on you and what type of person you are. Stace also claims that it is delusion to think that determinism is incompatible with free will meanwhile it is merely impossible for them to be compatible as determinism claims that freedom is just an illusion while free will is the complete opposite and is the notion that people are free to act and behave as they please. How can free will and determinism be compatible when people have no control of the causes that occur around them which according to Stace is the reason that they act in a certain manner? If people are not able to genuinely control their actions due to predetermined causes that make them act a certain way, then do they really have free will?…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions. Both free will and determinism are faulty, they have problems within each one that the other tries to make up for, making them interdependent. Compatibilism is a combination of both Free Will and Determinism. I believe Compatibilism because when looked at individually, free will and…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Paul’s premise, he argues that if we have determinism, then there isn’t any free will and determinism is outright true and free will does not exist. Holbach believes that free will is controlled by nature itself. If outside sources contribute to our behaviors, how can we be responsible for our own actions. Holbach believes that if something isn’t in our control, then there is something, whether internal or external that is forcing us to do the things we do. Morally speaking, we don’t dictate any decisions, we don’t make up what comes to our minds nor are we free due to these things.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In d’Holbach’s concept of free will, all is condensed to the physical brain and subject only to external influences rather than a soul, and consciousness. Therefore, it is unacceptable for a Dualist perspective to accept his stance on free will. Since d’Holbach views that there is no such thing as free will, a major concern of his argument is brought up being that if a persons’ actions are pre-determined and in order to fit with his proposition, it would not be morally correct to punish that individual for their actions. It would still be practical to isolate a harmful individual from society from d’Holbach’s view, except it would only be done for logical reasons and not for disciplinary…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is different with libertarianism as determinism believes that we were already determined by certain causes outside of the power of will, while libertarianism believes in the theory that we are truly free in our choices. They also disagree on the idea of responsibility; determinist does not believe we can be responsible when we have no free will, while libertarians think differently. Although determinism and libertarianism have little to none in common, compatibilism can bring them together. The way that free will is compatible with determinism is called compatibilism. Although compatibilism and libertarianism are similar, they can also be quite different.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sartre accepts that “Far from being able to modify our situation at our whim, we seem to be unable to change ourselves. I am not "free" either to escape the lot of my class, of my nation, of my family” (Sartre, 2003, p. 503). Sartre argues that one is free due to one's constant ability to choose our projects in life and we are free to place the meaning we wish to these situations. Sartre's idea of freedom differs from the traditional understanding, and this is especially clear when we consider the Prisoner (Sartre, 2003, p.505). The traditional understanding of freedom revolves around the idea of one's ability to act, to reach one's aims.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Control is out of this world. “Compatibilism is the thesis that we are both determined and yet at the same time have the sort of freedom necessary to be morally responsible for our actions” (McKenna). Everybody has their own viewpoints on free will and hard determinism. It is often said that it can only be one or the other. The economy, the laws, and the people are only doing what is set in stone for them to be doing, or making their own choices in life.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays