Consequentialism Vs Deontology

Improved Essays
Show More
This writing piece will define and discuss the statement, “More so than deontology, consequentialism appeals to modern intuitions about morality.” I shall explain why I believe this statement is not true basing my argument in two main postulates.
To properly explain the meaning of this statement, there are four main concepts we need to clearly understand, namely, deontology, consequentialism, modern institutions, and morality. Deontology is defined by Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as the moral theory that establishes what we should do and evaluate our choices whether they are allowed, required or forbidden (2007). In other words, it bases morality on the adherence to the rules. On the other hand, according to the Stanford Encyclopedia …show more content…
So, if it is not to modern institutions, what does consequentialism appeal to? The answer is quite complex. I would say that consequentialism appeals to best consequences, to the good. The good of people, ways in which life and quality of life are maximized. To do analyze consequences that are the best, it is necessary to analyze the context where people develop. Good consequences are always going to be the ones that maximize life and quality of life, but the ways to reach them are going to be influenced by the society, its norms and institutions which differ greatly from one another. But, once again, consequentialism is not going to appeal to modern institutions but to the …show more content…
In fact, I believe that consequentialism does not appeal to modern institutions at all and if so, there should be to a small extent. The reason for this is that institutions vary, best consequences do not and consequentialism rely on best consequences. On the other hand, deontology does rely on modern institutions. With this in mind, I have explained why I disagree with the statement, “More so than deontology, consequentialism appeals to modern intuitions about morality.” Since its reasoning is incorrect and words deontology and consequentialism should switch places in the sentence to be read it, “More so than consequentialism, deontology appeals to modern intuitions.” To me, it would make more sense this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Kant's Critique Of Consequentialism
    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Kant's Critique Of Consequentialism

    Kant’s critique of consequentialism comes from his principle of morality, more specifically the categorical imperative, and how it is immoral to use an individual as merely as a means to an ends and not be treated as ends in themselves. This theory is in distinct contrast with the principles of consequentialism because the theory is based on the fact that the consequences of a conduct determines whether the conduct is right or wrong. The individual would thus be a slave of utility maximization because their actions would solely be based off of reaping the best possible results. Therefore, meaning that consequentialism does not take into account the morally relevant difference between acts and omissions because consequentialism ignores moral…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarian Approach To Punishment
    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Utilitarian Approach To Punishment

    In this essay I will discuss two approaches to punishment which are retributivism, also known as non-consequentialism, and utilitarianism, also known as consequentialism. I will then analyse three justifications of punishment within the utilitarian approach which are reform and rehabilitation, individual and general deterrence and incapacitation. Retributivism is a sociological perspective of crime which looks at the different forms and changes in punishment. It is a backward thinking approach as it does not look at future consequences of punishment and is mostly concerned with offences already committed and getting ‘justice’. This approach is considered similar to ‘an eye for an eye’ as it is based on the idea that if we inflict harm on another…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Critique Of Seecebeesia's Deontological System
    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Critique Of Seecebeesia's Deontological System

    A Critique of Seecebeesia’s Deontological System In the nation of Seecebeesia, a unique approach to the transgression of the moral law of the land is practiced: instead of punitive measures as a response to crime, Seecebeesia employs “rehabilitation centers”, where the offender is educated as to why the act he or she has committed is ethically and morally wrong, alongside being provided with training and additional education, which are to contribute to improving overall quality of life once one has left the rehabilitation center. Clearly, then, in Seecebeesia, the understanding of the transgression of the law presupposes that a logical and rational moral and ethical foundation for the law exists. This is because the entire punitive system of Seecebeesia is based on the notion that their laws are ethically sound because they are also rational: the reason why these laws should…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Rutland Model: The Consequentialist And Deontological Approach
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Rutland Model: The Consequentialist And Deontological Approach

    The Rutland model studies a dilemma from three different points of view: the consequentialist approach, which considers results; the deontological approach, which focuses on personal rights; and the aspirational approach, which considers the person whom is making the decision and who they want to be. Consequentialist Approach. The consequentialist approach, also known as Utilitarianism, studies the consequences of an outcome and considers “the greatest good for the greatest number of people without causing harm” (Ethical Toolkit, n.d.). By evaluating the overall happiness level created in response to each option will help determine which course of action to take.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Prima Facie Immigrates
    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Prima Facie Immigrates

    The second term that I will bring up while discussing this topic is consequentialism. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines this term as, “the theory that the value and especially the moral value of an act should be judged by the value of its consequences.” I feel that the rest of the terms or phrases that I will use in this paper are going to be simple enough that they do not need any…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Act Consequentialism: The Most Plausible Moral Theory
    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Act Consequentialism: The Most Plausible Moral Theory

    I will argue that act consequentialism is the most plausible moral theory because it better summarizes my thought process when making a decision. Act consequentialism is interchangeably used with classical act utilitarianism. This theory states that you ought to do whatever will produce the best (or least bad) overall consequences. Some phrases an act consequentialist would use is “The greatest good for the greatest number” or “The ends justify the means”. These phrases just emphasize that as long as the end results maximize the best consequences, then you should do what requires you to get those results.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism And Utilitarianism In Garrett Hardin's Lifeboat Ethics
    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Consequentialism And Utilitarianism In Garrett Hardin's Lifeboat Ethics

    Essentially, consequentialist moral theories are concerned with the consequences of actions. That is, what makes an action right is the consequences it will bring about for everyone. On the other hand, Nonconsequentialist theories are not concerned with the consequences of actions but with the nature of the actions, this is what nonconsequentialists look at when judging whether an action is right or wrong. The theories in discussion can then be categorized as such. Both Utilitarianism ans Ethical Egoism fall under Consequentialist theories because their main focus are consequences.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Consequence Ethics
    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Consequence Ethics

    Consequence ethics is focusing on what gives the best overall good for the greatest amount of people. If so, does that mean it is okay for a smaller amount of people to suffer for the greater good? A consequentialist ought to act according to what produces the largest amount of pleasure, and therefor he has to defy that some people will have to suffer for it, if the outcome produces more well-being. There is a case considered a problem with distributing resources in a community from Julia Driver’s book Ethics the Fundamentals. There is a town with a population consisting of 100 people.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Ethical Theory Of Abortion: The Consequences Of Morality
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ethical Theory Of Abortion: The Consequences Of Morality

    According to the theory, the only thing that matters is whether or not the abortion will produce more or less general value. However, it is not clear whether the consequentialists would support or deny abortion. It is evident that, whenever the carrying out of abortion provides the greatest good, they will support the idea. On the other hand, if abortion does not bring the greatest goodness,…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Theory Strengths And Weaknesses
    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kant's Theory Strengths And Weaknesses

    Moral philosophy tries to explain the difference between right and wrong so that people can make good decisions. However, finding out what makes an action right is not so easy. For this reason, several different theories have evolved while trying to explain this issue. One of those theories is deontology, or duty-defined morality. Probably the most famous and influential spokesman of this theory is Immanuel Kant.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Egoism: Faqs On Utilitarianism
    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ethical Egoism: Faqs On Utilitarianism

    A: Consequentialist theories basically is a morally right action that produces a good outcome or result, and the consequences of an action or rule generally outweigh all other considerations another word the ends justify the means. There are 7 types of Consequentialism Theories. Q: What are key features of utilitarianism? A: Utilitarianism is based on the concept of utility, a theory of usefulness.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Hart-Fuller Debate Analysis
    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hart-Fuller Debate Analysis

    This will be done by considering Prof. Lon Fuller’s claim that there is an intrinsic connection between law and morality and Prof. H.L.A Hart’s rejection thereof. First, Hart’s support of the separation thesis will be considered. This thesis is…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Ethics In Criminal Justice
    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Importance Of Ethics In Criminal Justice

    Decision making in the criminal justice system are met with competing values and interests. These conflicts relate to the determination of what is right or wrong and can be interrupted differently in some situations based upon the culture, changes over time, and on an individual’s upbringing. With this in mind, some decision such as those found in police discretion can be guided by social norms, justice, and personal values, but the police often encounter situations resulting in gray areas. Therefore, laws, training, and agency guidelines and code of conduct are put in place to assist officers in the decisions making process to set specific standards and processes (Gaines & Kappeler, 2011). With this in mind, the ethical and moral principles…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism Vs Deontology Essay
    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Consequentialism Vs Deontology Essay

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant And Deontological Ethics Essay
    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Immanuel Kant And Deontological Ethics Essay

    The defining feature of deontological ethics is that it decides whether an action is moral or immoral without considering anything else. For example, Kant argues that lying is never under any circumstances acceptable, no matter what the situation, as we cannot will for lying to be a universal maxim. Whereas the consequentialist view is of the opposite opinion that it is our consequences that hold moral value, not our actions. Concequentialists believe in the theory of “the greater good” and therefore aim to make the most people the most happy they can in society, Because of this, they take the view that telling a lie in some instances is acceptable if it goes on to produce good consequences later on. This seems like an ideal theory if we could actually pre determine the outcome of our actions, but we have little or no control in the real world over how our actions turn out.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings