Deductively Against The Existence Of God Analysis

Improved Essays
The argument argues deductively against the existence of God based on a theist’s explanation of the existence of evil and the characteristics of God. Personally, I think this argument is weak. First, God, the creator of the universe, is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, which is all-PKG based on the common western culture point of view. Based on the characters of god, the existence of evil is contradict to the existence of god since the god is defined as all-PKG.

Evil is being separated into two parts. First, evil that is created upon human actions. Second,natural events that has negative effects. For the first kind of evil, it can be examined by an example of murderer. Killing someone is the decision made by the murderer and this kind of behavior is being considered as evil. For the second kind of evil, it can be explained by natural disaster like earthquakes. Since the behavior of nature is out of human being’s control, the occurrence of earthquake is being consider as evil. Furthermore, evil is argued to exist for the reasons of soul-building and as the consequence of freedom. Soul-building means learning from evil. For example if someone lied to you, and you made a wrong decision because of it than you will learn from it, which means the victim will never easily believe anyone anymore. Hence, after the experience with evil, the non-evil people will learn from it and armor himself.
…show more content…
If an all-PKG being existed, then there would be no more evil than the minimum required for soul-building and as a consequence of human

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Evil in both Augustine’s works, in the Confessions and The City of God, as well as in Anglo-Saxon poem of Beowulf. Even though Augustine’s was more realistic, where God is the source of being good. If you tend to astray away from him them you are corrupt and will become evil. It will lead you to death and agony. While in Beowulf even though the monsters and the superhuman abilities aren’t real, the poem does teach you a great amount of Good vs. Evil.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An Imperfect God Analysis

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Taylor Smith 10/15/14 History 4090 The Conflicted Mind of George Washington An Imperfect God: George Washington, His Slaves, and the Creation of America. By Henry Wiencek. (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003. Pp. 404.)…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An ontological argument is a deductive argument with a priori premises. It was first offered by St. Anslem in the 11th century. St. Anslem was a Benedictine monk, priest and scholar. He was the Archbishop of Canterbury from 1093 to his death in 1109. (Lecture)…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica: Proofs for the Existence of God, is a thirteenth century collection of five deductive arguments that, as the name suggests, supposedly prove the existence of God. In these arguments, or proofs, as Aquinas calls them, there is the assumption that there are some things that only God is capable of making happen – such as motion and cause - and ergo, God has to exist for these things to exist. Aquinas' first argument for the existence of God is that of the 'Unmoved Mover', which draws from Aristotle's ideas of acutality and potentiality to summarise that some things are in motion, but they cannot move themselves, a mover is required. Similarly, Aquinas' second argument, the argument of the first cause, states that some things are caused, and for this to happen they must be caused by something else, a 'causer' so to speak. This essay will assert the argument that whilst neither of these arguments are necessarily invalid, both of them are unsound, as although the logic itself has validity, the…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cosmological argument, in it’s simplest terms, can be broken up into a few understood points that make it what some to believe the answer to God’s existence. The same form of argument that the cosmological argument possesses can actually be applied to discrediting the existence of God. The origin of time and the relationship between an infinite set of causes and effects and if it has a creator both work together in forming good points against the credibility of the cosmological argument made for the existence of God. There are two main assertions made by the argument in favor of God’s existence. The first, when laid out in simpler terms, is as follows; everything that exists must have a first cause so that means that if the universe began to exist, it must have a first cause.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God: The Existence Of God

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His argument looks at the broad sense of what God is and disregards your individual opinion on what God is if you have one. Someone can argue with the argument by saying something not completely relevant to the argument such as saying we have not actually proved the existence of God because we still do not know if he is the creator of the universe is. However, that has nothing to do with our argument. We have proved the definition and therefore existence of God; not whether or not he is the creator. Through the use of deductive argument, the strong premises have persuaded me that God does in fact…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes makes some very intriguing arguments for the existence of God. I am going to outline the three arguments and provide my opinion over them in form of criticism, like requested. In his first argument, Descartes has an idea that everything has a cause, and that his idea of God being an infinitely perfect being has a cause because Descartes, himself, does not believe he is infinitely perfect. He believes that he could not have an idea of their being an infinitely perfect person unless there actually is. Therefore, an infinitely perfect person exists outside of him, who he believes to be God.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With this argument there is no need for finding physical evidence for the existence of God. It attempts to prove the existence of God by the word and meaning of God (existence, n.d.). This argument is also a prioi argument which means it’s based of logic. It uses logic to prove the existence of god is true.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another flaw is that the argument treats existence like it is a property of god, like omnipotence, but it is not. God would have to exist to have any properties as if something does not exist it cannot have properties. You must know something exists before you can know any properties it may…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second part of this argument focuses on the definition of God but is perceived so clearly and distinctly. The idea of God is of a supremely perfect being. A supremely perfect being has all perfections. Existence is a predicate of a perfect being, therefore, God must exist to avoid being self-contradictory. Therefore, God exists.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This argument is jarring because the atheistic conclusion that "Therefore, God almost certainly does not exist" seems to come suddenly out of left field. You don't need to be a philosopher to realize that that conclusion doesn't follow from the six previous statements. Indeed, if we take these six statements as premises of an argument implying the conclusion "Therefore, God almost certainly does not exist," then the argument is patently invalid. No logical rules of inference would permit you to draw this conclusion from the six premises.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has been an age old debate on whether God exists. Throughout the world there are different beliefs and viewpoints on the topic of the existence of a being that is all-powerful, all knowing, and all-loving. There are the “Theists” those who believe in God and there are “atheists” those who do not believe in God. Along with those there is people who are known as “Agnostic” who have the belief that the existence of God is unknown and unknowable. As there is no physical evidence of the existence of God references that I will make will be based off of “The Design Argument” by Neil Manson, as well as a common objection to said argument and a way to refute that said counter to the subject, because I strongly believe that God does in fact exist…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil is the notion that is used to signify unhealthy qualities rather that specific substance. In combination, these qualities may lead to injury or mischief. The effect that is being brought by the combination of such qualities is often referred to as “evil.” The same notion can also apply to a substance that is having nature or properties which finally may negatively affect a person. In general, evil is not something that is simply bad – the practice actually shows that evil is more than that.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you agree with the ontological argument for god’s existence? Why or why not? 1. Introduction For the vast majority of human history our intellectual power has been directed at trying to prove the existence of gods, I will be looking at an argument for god/s existence called the Ontological argument.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For centuries atheists and theists have debated one of the most important questions to date; does God exist? Are there hard evidences to prove His existence if he truly is real? Most importantly, why is there so much evil in this world? These questions cannot be easily answered, nor will there ever be a definite answer for them from either point of view; however, they are still thought provoking and great questions to explore and discuss to find a better understanding of why we believe what we believe, and why others may have a different view. In his article “On being an Atheist”, H. J. McCloskey attempts to inform other atheists that the reasoning theists have for believing in God is not feasible by presenting them in the view of an atheist.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays