Deductive Method Essay

The inductive method is statistics collected concerning the behaviors and mannerisms of how criminals conduct themselves while in the act of doing a crime. Not all criminals are the same but within this method it is suggested that although everyone is different they still commit comparable wrongdoings and therefore have a connection. An example of this is unreliable, such as if all child molesters were found to have committed drug related offenses at an earlier age then it is concluded in an inductive way that most child molesters all have had drug related offenses at an early age. It is said that most people that have been sexually assaulted end up committing the same crime later in life. I was molested as a child and brutally raped as a young adult. Grouping together people because of a similar occurrence is not only inaccurate but incredibly offensive.
Unlike the deductive method, the inductive method does not require specialized forensic, psychological, or intuitive (Holmes, 2002). There is the likelihood of these predisposition outcomes in the constricting of the investigation. In this case the results can be very inaccurate and may cause an overlook of suspects or notion of innocent people. Classifying people into categories can lead to a huge failure. What is missing are the very skilled or lucky individuals that have eluded capture …show more content…
Taking time to not only look at the evidentiary material but to also look at victimology, and how the culprit carried out the crime. This requires to remain objective, detached and susceptible to anything new. The deductive method takes more time compared to the inductive method since the investigator is gaining a more accurate profile of the situation, a modes operandi, and the perp. This method also holds the investigators accountable and helps to develop a motive and an approach when it comes to