Death Means Nothing To Us Analysis

Improved Essays
Is it irrational to fear death? Lucretius believes that death is not bad for the one who has died. Imagine that a young John Doe was run over by a trolley and died. If at death, the person ceases to exist, is being dead bad for Doe? It isn’t bad for him because he is no longer here. There is no more to his story. Lucretius presents two arguments to support the view that ‘death means nothing to us’; the first argument is the standard Epicurean notion of the soul, based on their physics; the second is his symmetry argument.
The first argument, the standard Epicurean notion of the soul, states that death means nothing to us, because at death, the soul is detached, and thus we are no longer physically here. This argument relies upon their perception of the soul, and it’s physics. Death is the end of life, nothing more. It is purely the point where the body begins to degenerate and it’s the end of its run, the spirit and mind is gone. “Mind and spirit are interconnected and compose between them a single substance…the spirit, diffused throughout the body obeys the mind and moves under its direction and impulse” (Lucretius 82). The mind by itself experiences thought and joy of its own at a time when nothing moves either the body or the spirit. The mind
…show more content…
The status of being dead refers to the eternal time period after one’s death. And the symmetry argument basically depends on the analogy between this period and the period before one’s birth. In both of these two periods, we do not exist and can feel nothing. Therefore, both of these two time periods are not harmful to us. In the eternal period before our birth, we were not present and our sensation was not present. At the same time, in the everlasting time after our death, we will not exist and our sensation or consciousness will disappear. We did not matter before and we will not matter

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In the two texts that we read in class, Plato, Phaedo, and Lucretius, Nature of Things, both Socrates and Lucretius try to reassure us that we should not be afraid of death. In Plato, Phaedo, Phaedo is telling the story of Socrates’s final hours from being their first hand. In Lucretius, Nature of Things, Lucretius’s telling his view on religious issues and how he got to his view, poetic skills, and study on scientific phenomena. Both Socrates and Lucretius have different arguments on why we should not be afraid of death. Socrates and Lucretius would have their own responses to each other 's argument if they were to reply to each other.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The question of whether or not a fear of death is rational is the crux of Jeffrie Murphy’s article Rationality and the Fear of Death in which he sets out to argue that it is irrational to fear death and concludes that a fear of death is on the one hand rational if it helps the person live a meaningful life and on the other hand irrational when it has no real purpose in helping one live the way he wishes to. Murphy’s conclusion however leaves much to be desired about where one draws the line between a fear of death aiding in the quality of one’s life versus an irrational fear of death that in a sense drives one away from living. I plan on trying to define where this line can be drawn in reference to Murphy’s conclusion, as well as arguing further…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    YES I will argue that being dead will not be bad for the person who dies. I will do so by first constructing the Epicurean approach to the badness of the state of death with several minor clarifications, before highlighting the inadequacies of standard anti-Epicurean arguments operating with counterfactual theories of harm in refuting Epicurus when his argument is interpreted within the parameter of death as a state. Additionally, as Epicureanism’s break with commonsense values is often what motivates the search for a metaphysics compatible with the morality of killing, I aim to reduce the inclination of those who desire to countenance Epicurus in a revisionist manner by reconciling commonsense values- most notably, the morality of killing-…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This argument is not realistic in today’s society, as even the most astute believers of any religion have fears and anxieties regarding what comes after death. On the opposite end of the spectrum, there are plenty of atheists who embrace death despite the undeniable ambiguity of the…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As I Lay Dying Analysis

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A woman’s role presented in “As I Lay Dying,” and Raise the Red Lantern is associated with having children. In these two stories, women are used to have babies, and once they complete that task they are forgotten about. A woman’s personality, and wellbeing is unimportant to the men, therefore leaving it up to the women on whether or not they want to please the man, or choose to do what makes them happy. In “As I Lay Dying,” Dewey Dell, a seventeen-year-old girl, was faced with the challenge of keeping her pregnancy a secret. Dewey Dell was forced to keep her secret quiet, so that she was not looked at as a disgrace.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “cyclical argument” of the Phaedo imparts the ideology Socrates had in regard to the immortality of the soul and his views about death, which he was about to face himself. Among a gathering of his most faithful followers, his friends are astonished that Socrates is not desolate about his ill fate, but rather, he is delighted with it. Socrates proclaims that the life of a philosopher is merely a preparation for death since the mind is most pure when the pressures of the body is felt least. He even informs them that he believes in the soul and the afterlife. After his friends vocalized their skepticism of his beliefs, he begins a discourse in which he attempts to prove the immortality of the soul.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus’s thinking of the soul was that since the soul is made of material and that if the soul dies, then the body dies and therefore there is no reason to fear death. This is because he believes if the soul leaves the body we will not exist to experience the death of the body. This is known as the Argument from Experience, there are two counter arguments to this argument. Firstly, the Argument from Deprivation, which states that death is harmful due to the deprivation of pleasurable experiences one is missing out on by being dead. This argument takes a comparative view on why death is harmful.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Deathless Soul in Plato’s Phaedo In his dialogue, the Phaedo, Plato offers justification for the immortality of the soul. Plato does this through an argument many have referred to as the “final argument.” I will explicitly make sure that the arguments are clearly expressed and explained. First, I will discuss some of the key features of the previous three arguments in the Phaedo.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Can you imagine a thirteen-year-old girl, who was healthy but had to take her tonsils out go from getting her tonsils removed to a near-death experience. In Rachel Aviv’s article “What Does It Mean To Die?” goes into a deeper meaning of false result on being brain dead. Aviv’s article uses Jahi’s story to prove that there is a lot of confusion between being brain dead and having the brain injury. Aviv uses rhetorical devices, like ethos, pathos, imagery and repetition to persuade her audience that showing a patient with no brain activity seen does not mean they are not dead.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dead Enough Analysis

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I have always maintained the idea that if my health is to degrade into a persistent vegetative state (PVS) that I would prefer my family and friends to let me pass and harvest my organs for a potential recipient who could use my organs to live a longer life. This way, I would not only be less of a burden on my family and friends but I could actually benefit another individual in a final act of altruism. Of course, the harvesting of my organs would only take place in the event of my death or imminent death and would benefit others in a utilitarian sense. Most of this sounds simple enough and reasonable until we discuss how to define death. Am I accepting of my organ harvesting once I experience “brain death” or rather the cessation of cardiac…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Phaedo. The question of this dialogue: Man before death. Should man love death? If so, why then, condemn suicide? Or should man hate death?…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates’s Argument on Death The topic of death frightens human beings for several reasons because of the speculation and the anxiety that surround death. Even though most people fear death, philosophers such as Socrates argue that there is no valid reason to fear death (Ahrensdorf 1995). According to 5Socrates, death is a blessing in the context of the relocation of the soul. Socrates avers that death is something that people should not fear and provide several arguments to validate his argument.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Weakness of Death “On Death, Without Exaggeration” by Wislawa Szymborska is an observation of Death by a third party. The speaker is discussing how little power Death has in a life. Many people feel that death is omnipotent and they have no power over this. The speaker is using evidence seen over many years to show the reader that Death is not an all powerful entity. Death is the same awkward truth in life just like it was when the world first began.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But based on what I believe today, I find that death secretly excites me. It is no longer some unknown void that keeps me awake at night, half curious and half afraid – but something to look forward to at the end of a life well-lived. This does not mean that I want to end my own life, because I feel very blessed to be alive with the opportunity to learn and to help others. It also doesn’t mean that I won’t grieve when others die, or that I won’t be afraid as a patient facing imminent death.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays