David Hume's Morals Is The Basis Of Morality

Improved Essays
David Hume’s belief that morality is based on sentiment can be defined by the feelings of approval and disapproval one will have when they act. Hume argues that reason cannot discover moral truths but that sentiment is the basis of morality. I agree with Hume in the sense that one needs a feeling of approval or disapproval in order to motivate an action. Hume presents the argument that one's feelings is the basis of morality and that reasons, not reason alone, which is defined to be a cause or justification on why one may act, can not be the basis of morality solely because reason is already proved and can not be changed by influence. Reason also deals with matter of fact. Matter of fact can be seen as doing something just to do it because one is told too or may have been taught to do something a specific way. If one was to act with reason, which is paired with matter of fact, it would mean that one is acting …show more content…
But how could that be true? To have emotion is to have an intuitive feeling about something. Hume's belief and the definition of emotion go hand and hand by saying that one must feel a specific way about something in order to act but, acting with reason and matter of fact just acting to do so, with no emotion is not possible in Hume’s opinion. But, Hume's belief and also my opinion, that morality is based on sentiments which is having feelings and can also be defined as a view toward something or an opinion. How can one can have an opinion without feeling? I believe that in order to have an opinion you have to feel some way toward said subject which supports Hume's belief and excludes the idea of reason being a way to discover moral truths. Hume does not dismiss the idea of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality as used in the context is defined as the principles revolving around the differentiation between wrong and right behavior of the human. As the last thinker of the enlightenment, Kant was a philosopher that believed that reason was the only thing that morality can come from. In contrast Mill was a philosopher who believed that morality is utility, meaning that something is moral only if it brings happiness or pleasure. In looking at both Kant ’s…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume was one of the most influential philosophers of his time and continues to be mentioned and studies to this day. Almost equally as impressive was the response that philosopher Immanuel Kant had to his Inquiry of Human Understanding. Kant attempted to respond to Hume’s ideas and in this essay, I will identify the Hume’s beliefs behind the concepts such as cause, and effect and I will later defend Kant’s response to Hume. He raises points that leave his reader with a deeper understanding of his concept and explicitly outlines his beliefs on the concepts that Hume covers in his Human Inquiry.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As mentioned previously, Hume believes that all ideas and concepts come from previous experience. Every idea from the simplest to the most complex that us humans have had, or are going to have in our lifetime, can all be traced back to and fuelled down to our impressions, or experiences with our inner and outer senses. On the contrary, if we cannot trace an idea back to its origins, then the idea should be discarded and rejected as meaningless. Hume’s Copy Principle requires one to understand the difference between simple and complex ideas as well as the difference between ideas and impressions. David Hume defines simple ideas as those made up of simple or one identity and cannot be further broken down into more basic concepts.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Morality cannot be legislated, but behavior can be regulated. Judicial decrees may not change the heart, but they can restrain the heartless” (Martin Luther King Jr.). This quote by King describes how morality cannot ultimately be dictated by laws, but behavior can be. True morality comes from the heart and laws won’t cause someone have a morality change. Moral behavior is very often influenced by both religion and laws in the way that religion can make people think they may be punished in the afterlife for certain actions, laws, and both religion and laws have things that are prohibited that really aren’t “wrong”.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Concepts of freedom and morality gained a lot of momentum during the Enlightenment period. The Enlightenment period saw a shift from the main line of thinking from religion to reason. Because of this shift of the dominant ideologies, philosophers attempted to explain morality through empirical means rather than attributing morality to God. Two of the most influential philosophers of this period were Immanuel Kant and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. This essay will show how Kant’s perspective of freedom and morality was inspired by Rousseau and how the way in which Kant’s view of freedom relates to his idea of the moral law is due to his view of autonomy.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume and Immanuel Kant are both known for their great contributions to moral philosophy. Hume who is mainly known for his empiricism, skepticism and naturalism and Kant who is best recognized for his great work in metaphysics, ethics and also for his contributions in others disciplines in the area of philosophy. Although they were both exceptional philosophers and gave stupendous apports, Hume and Kant agreed nor differed in various aspect and ideas. Hume believed and is mostly based on his empiricism which involves the theory of the mind. Hume’s empiricism consist in to affirm that the moral foundation is not in the reason but in the senses.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Of course, Humes only feel religious beliefs can be rational if they have concrete evidence to support. Humes doesn’t question whether God exists or not, but if we as people can come up with a conclusion on Gods nature and being. In respondence to what Aquinas states and his five reason, I believe Humes wouldn’t completely agree with Aquinas. I say this because Humes is all about being rational. If there isn’t enough evidence in the world, he believes that there may not be a way to find out if God a powerful, wise and perfect.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hume believed that justice promoted human happiness. Hume was a moral sentimentalist so he believed morality was grounded in something other than reason. He was similar to Hutcheson in this aspect but he also believed individual justice can sometime conflict with what benevolence would motivate us to do. A sentimentalist believes that judgments about what is right depends on our passions rather than reason or a moral sense but, he also thinks the sentimentalist owes us an account of how a sense of justice that is opposed to sympathy or self-interest that can also develop out of such motives. The virtue of justice in not natural and is actually artificial according to Hume.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Question 1: Where do our morals come from? Morals are not as instinctive as heartbeats. A sense of right or wrong is teachable, but not as permanent as bones and blood. People are not born with morals instilled in them.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What David Hume is stating, is that those that think they have control of their feelings, are just tricking themselves, on the grounds that they are "balanced" just to the degree that their feelings permit them to be. A case of this is affection. On the off chance that you are enamored, reason "goes out the window." So does sight, sensibility, thought, and rationale. The scientific method gives a decent case of this procedure.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This suggests that moral development doesn’t begin until we are able to control our bodily driven appetites and desire. As well as feel the effects of pleasure and pain for appropriate objects; the key aspect being able to recognize the feeling of pleasure and pain outside of our bodily sensations, which is crucial in moral development and a moral life. A philosophers deeper look into Hume’s ethics on moral sentiments state: “Pleasure and pain must be involved in moral evaluation because they are always present in the indirect passions as well as for why the moral sentiments cannot be produced either by inanimate objects or by anything but the character of a person” (Boatright, 84).…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays