Analysis Of David Hume's Ethical Theory

Improved Essays
The search for the truth could be endless and an extremely tedious journey. This so called truth is the answer to the worlds, more so the peoples, questions about the reality to which almost all people live in. Among these questions is, what is morally right or wrong and who decides this. Is there a code that we could or should live by to set an example or are these codes wrong in themselves or for everybody else? A person of interest whose name is David Hume has set an interesting theory for ethics that he believes people should live by or at least follow to the best of their abilities.
To begin Hume’s moral theory is comprised of four theses which are “(1) Reason alone cannot be a motive to the will, but rather is the “slave of the passions” (2) Moral distinctions are not derived from reason. (3) Moral distinctions are derived from the moral sentiments: feelings of approval (esteem, praise) and disapproval (blame) felt by spectators who contemplate a character trait or action. (4) While some virtues and vices are natural,
…show more content…
Natural virtues and vices are things that can cause positive and negative emotions, but are natural. Hume would say too much pride, lust, and anger are examples of a natural vice, due to it, causing dissatisfaction to others. This is similar to religious views where sins would be something that causes a discomfort to others. Moving forward, a natural virtue could be something, such as, self-esteem. This is something that’s good for the person and society, natural virtue benefits the majority of people, therefore self-esteem would be considered a natural virtue. An artificial virtue or vice is something that is made by man in order to better society, whether or not it does is another question. An example used would be justice, for the reason, it was created by man to punish those who committed crimes that hurts

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume's Argument

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Hume begins his argument by asserting that animals, just like humans, learn from experience and come to infer causal connections between events. Hume describes this principle by saying: “[animals] become acquainted with the more obvious properties of eternal objects, and gradually, from their birth, treasure up a knowledge of the nature of fire, water, earth, stones, heights, depths, &c. and of the effect, which result from their operation” (Hume, 70). In order to illustrate his point, Hume cites several examples: horses learn what heights they can safely leap, and dogs learn to fear the sight of a whip (Hume, 70). Furthermore, Hume claims that non-human animals certainly do not learn to make these inferences by means of reason or argument.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In David Hume’s an Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, Hume explains the connection and distinction between impressions and ideas. Impressions are our perceptions of our senses; “hear, or see, or feel, or love, or hate, or desire, or will” (539). Ideas are our perceptions that reflect on those sensations. One big difference between ideas and impressions is that ideas can be things that do not exist, like unicorn or space aliens (539). He states in his Principle of Empiricism that for every idea there is a corresponding impressions and simpler ideas.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Last semester I took an Applied Ethics class and one of the philosophers we discussed was Peter Singer who is a utilitarian who believes in maximizing good and minimize harm and suffering. While Singer holds no firm religious belief in his adult life, he understands not all evil can be prevented but as humans we can do our part by at least minimizing it. His theory is, if you see a child drowning in a pond you should save the child. Like Singer, David Hume struggled with the idea of God existing since there is pain and suffering.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    31). According to the philosopher, virtue is a ‘characteristic’ rather than as opposed to a ‘passion’ or ‘capacity’. This characteristic is determined by an individual’s choice. These choices must be determined in mean of wisdom and rationale, which is the implication in which it is labeled a virtue. In justification, an individual is permitted to act in accordance to a particular virtue that is most appropriate for the circumstances.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume was one of the most influential philosophers of his time and continues to be mentioned and studies to this day. Almost equally as impressive was the response that philosopher Immanuel Kant had to his Inquiry of Human Understanding. Kant attempted to respond to Hume’s ideas and in this essay, I will identify the Hume’s beliefs behind the concepts such as cause, and effect and I will later defend Kant’s response to Hume. He raises points that leave his reader with a deeper understanding of his concept and explicitly outlines his beliefs on the concepts that Hume covers in his Human Inquiry.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, justice cannot be a natural virtue. In conclusion, Hume believes that justice is based on convention and tries to aim that social virtues are most important for mutual agreements to be in order. As citizens, it is our duty and obligation to obey the laws that we have agreed to follow and because they are in our best interest as a society. Hume’s discussion of justice is important and its’ purpose of discussion was t find the origin and nature of the virtue.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume once said, “ Reason is and ought only to be the slave of the passions.” He wrote this in his book Treatise on Human Nature. Hume was obsessed with learning about how people obtain knowledge. The answer is quite simple, through experience. We all entered this world as an infant; we had to learn what behavior was expected of us and what we were expected to give in return all through experience.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We are predisposed by nature to our moral virtues, but they can only be fully experienced by repeated expression and practice of them. Our moral virtues concentrate on our actions and feelings, and our actions and feelings always have an underlying presence of pleasure or pain (Aristotle 4-284). Being virtuous and understanding and recognizing the practical amount of pleasure and the minimal amount of pain one can take in help individuals to morally develop and in fact be virtuous. In turn how virtuous one is contributes to their capability to achieve happiness (Aristotle…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Causality is the structure of cause and effect, the relationship completely. For A must come before B, A being the cause and B the effect. This is one of the necessary conditions that need to be met, for causation to be applicable. At least three, need to be met altogether, such as temporal priority over cause and effect, and continuity. These conditions also have to happen at the same time, or it is not credible.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethics is said to be the source of morals; a treatise on this, moral principles, recognized rules of conduct. The Character of a man is expressed in terms of his Conduct. Ethics thus can be considered as the source of character of a person expressed as right or wrong conduct or action. Business Ethics is not a special set of ethical rules different from ethics in general and appropriate only to business.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics