Criminologists employ cross-sectional and longitude studies as observational studies during research. The two studies help criminology research to establish a comprehensive research methodology for comparisons of variables. Additionally, they create a coherent epistemology for deducing cause and effects. Mark Stafford observes that most criminology theories and research are causal. They attempt to establish the correlation between cause and effect. The criminology research is therefore designed to examine influences on a given variables. The use of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies in criminology increase the veracity of the findings. Consequently, intervention policy can be identified to reduce crime.
Cross-sectional studies are applied …show more content…
(2017) Opine logic is one of the foundations of the criteria of inferring causation. He further emphasizes idiographic causation and nomothetic mode as the indicators that satisfy criteria. These assertions help the research to build reliable probabilistic points inference. The three criteria include empirical correlative variables, the cause must precede the effect, and other factors should not influence the correlation between cause and effect (Maxfield,& Babbie,2017).The first criteria can be observed from cross-sectional studies as the research examine variable at the one point. This demonstrates how the cause leads to effect simultaneously. Inferring the causation in using the second criteria requires longitudinal studies to observe the impact of the cause. This involves identification of the influence of variables to classify their consequences (Maxfield, & Babbie, 2017).The final criteria of inferring causation require logical conclusion on the effect of different occurrence. It needs longitudinal studies to identify the change and effect of a particular cause. The aim of eliminating other factors that may influence the cause. This criterion is significant when criminology wants to infer sufficient causes. Conclusively, longitudinal and cross-sectional provide methodology framework for inferring
Cross-sectional studies are applied …show more content…
(2017) Opine logic is one of the foundations of the criteria of inferring causation. He further emphasizes idiographic causation and nomothetic mode as the indicators that satisfy criteria. These assertions help the research to build reliable probabilistic points inference. The three criteria include empirical correlative variables, the cause must precede the effect, and other factors should not influence the correlation between cause and effect (Maxfield,& Babbie,2017).The first criteria can be observed from cross-sectional studies as the research examine variable at the one point. This demonstrates how the cause leads to effect simultaneously. Inferring the causation in using the second criteria requires longitudinal studies to observe the impact of the cause. This involves identification of the influence of variables to classify their consequences (Maxfield, & Babbie, 2017).The final criteria of inferring causation require logical conclusion on the effect of different occurrence. It needs longitudinal studies to identify the change and effect of a particular cause. The aim of eliminating other factors that may influence the cause. This criterion is significant when criminology wants to infer sufficient causes. Conclusively, longitudinal and cross-sectional provide methodology framework for inferring