Criticism Of Human Intelligence

1477 Words 6 Pages
Human intelligence is one of the most widely discussed topics within the discipline of psychology, nevertheless, psychologists have not come to an agreement on the definition of intelligence. While many agree that intelligence refers to one’s ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think logically and abstractly, the question of whether there is one general intelligence or many ‘intelligences’ still persists (Gottfredson, 1997). As Deary (2001) has noted, sometimes we refer to someone’s general mental ability by calling an individual ‘bright’, while other times we recognise some special mental capacities by saying that someone is ‘good with figures’ but ‘bad at remembering’. This essay will consider the concept of human intelligence from …show more content…
For instance, Gardner’s (2011) multiple intelligence theory claims that the nine intelligences are separate and unrelated, however, many of his intelligences, such as verbal, mathematical and musical intelligences are found to be positively correlated and linked to the ‘g’ factor (Visser, Ashton & Vernon, 2006). Moreover, as Deary (2001) has noted, many of Gardner’s ‘invented’ intelligences are not normally regarded as mental abilities. For example, bodily kinaesthetic intelligence is more of a set of motor skills and interpersonal intelligence is related to personality characteristics, rather than to cognitive capacities. Sternberg’s (1984) triarchic model of intelligence was also strongly criticised for its lack of empirical evidence. Gottfredson (2003) argued that his theory is based on the selective data analysis and presentation of only favourable results. She also emphasised ‘g’ real-world correlates, particularly in work settings, and its predictive power of work performance, which, according to Gottfredson, the triarchic model of intelligence failed to do. Furthermore, Brody (2003) re-analysed data collected from the intelligence tests that are based on Sternberg’s triarchic model and found a strong support for the presence of ‘g’, which was not indicated by Sternberg. Furthermore, similarly as with Gardner’s theory, Sternberg’s supposedly independent intelligences were found to be positively correlated as well as linked to the ‘g’ factor (Brody, 2003). As Deary (2001) has noted, despite the attempt of modern theorists to deny the existence of the general intelligence, ‘g’ factor is almost always discovered in their data. Moreover, most of the recent collections of mental tests consistently indicated the hierarchical structure of mental abilities, similar to the Carroll’s three-stratum model of intelligence. That is, data indicated the ‘g’ factor that accounted

Related Documents