Cancian And Gibson: A Comparative Analysis

Improved Essays
Cancian & Gibson provide a 21st century snapshot on wars
1980s Iran-Irak (US Navy Patrol in Persian Gulf), Israeli invasion of Lebanon and prolonged conflict with Palestinians, Russian invasion of Afganistan, US invasion of Grenada, Guerrillas and counterinsurgencies campaigns in Nicaragua, El Salvador, Angola, South Africa and Third World countries.
Can War be considered as a natural everyday phenomenon?From comparative research in human society “War is not natural” “We created the war system so we can abolish it” (Cancian & Gibson, pdf)
While for centuries war was characterized by small warrior groups (lords/peasants) with revolution of French peasants, urban workers and part of the merchant class against feudal order the first big masses
…show more content…
Cancian & Gibson distinguish between Negative Peace (absence of war) and positive Peace (inclusive of socio-economic wellbeing and justice, and equal opportunities for development and improvements)
In our Capitalistic system the top of hierarchy, corporative ruling class, supports the concept of negative peace, because they want to maintain the status quo, although peace cannot be separated from social justice (Cancian & Gibson, pdf)
Barash and Webel also distinguish between positive and negative peace extending the positive concept to mental and spiritual states of “inner peace” and well-being, supporting this thesis through eastern concepts derived from Taoism and Confucianism.
I do not agree with their interpretation of the Judeo-Christian world in which they state that Jewish, Christian and Islamic tradition, have war elements embedded at their core. They even recall the bellicose god of the Old Testament. Other interpretations of the Old Testament define God as merciful.Although also the Christian tradition attributes an intrinsic innate sinful and therefore bellicose attitude to human
…show more content…
Is this the real definition of war? I do not agree! I believe his experience went beyond the psychological tolerance of violence, hence as a defense, he is trying to make sense of so much horror.
I do agree with Hedges that war eviscerates the worse and the best of human beings from cowardly to heroism.
Hedges defines the wars and ethnic conflicts of our times as “manufactured” (The Myth of War, pdf. 20-21), accusing the press of propagandistically creating the enemy figure, a situation in which the other is demonized and therefore we are justified to fight it. Is he trying to eviscerate that in human conflicts we tend to enhance our qualities and to dehumanize the enemy? This could be a psychological defense

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “What strategic theory or theorist do you believe best explains the nature and character of warfare in the Twenty-First Century?” War involves the destruction of physical and material strength of the parties involved. Destruction of life, institution, law, morality, culture, property, etc. This exhibits the nature of war and hence inherently in human history there has been wars, there has been fighting, and there has been killing. It is happening today and possibly will continue in the future, because nations need to be secure from threatening by other nations and/or fight for the protection of their interest. War has been used as an instrument by human beings to protect their interests.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cause Of War Analysis

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Causes of War “On the individual level of analysis, theories about war center on rationality. One theory, consistent with realism, holds that the use of war and other violent means of leverage in international conflicts is normal and reflects rational decisions of national leaders” (Goldstein & Pevenhouse). World War II wreaked havoc on the world due to the devastation caused by Adolf Hitler national leader of Germany whose intent was bent on destroying a race population whom he thought insignificant and inferior. Sparked by Adolf Hitler’s decision to invade Poland World war II began due to Hitler aggressive intent on ignoring the fact that Poland had the support of British and French military support. Hitler as an individual allowed his thoughts…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Khalid Sheikh Mohammed the logic of war Basically war is a conflict between two sovereign countries or a fight for independent. War has negative impact over the society. If there is war between two countries, people get killed, hungry, and there is no development. Selfishness is the most reason of war, on the other hand some people involve on war to get their independent. Mohammed claims there is language behind any war.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This poster is a clear example of how governments strived to make their opposition look worse and display them in a way that makes the audience hate them (Hopps). This idea of negatively depicting the enemy implies the moral duty of one country’s citizens--to only support their country, not the enemy. By twisting the truth about World War I and the opposing countries, propagandists were able to give audiences the perspective that this war was morally justified and worth fighting…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spectators may not see the beneficial side of war for they are too distracted by the blood, violence, and loss involved in warfare. Regrettably, this could be the catalyst that causes society to question the foundation of war leaving a sense of distrust. Ultimately in combat, virtuous ideals need to be victorious over the schemes that are embedded in the wicked depths of man which will then aid in restoring the people’s confidence when their country takes part in war. Achievement such as this can be seen through America’s involvement in the American Revolution in books, the Civil War in speeches, WW II in interviews, the Cold War in lecture notes, and the Korean War in textbooks. One war that has proved this theme true is the American Revolution.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    War Culture In The Iliad

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Iliad by Homer depicts a destructive war between the Achaeans and the Trojans as a criticism to the collective social norms and tradition that war promotes. Throughout the epic, the idea of war is championed by the both the Achaeans and the Trojan as the most formidable form of solving their dispute. However, this form of problem solving involves a social-Darwinian scenario where the strongest survive, while those who survive the war receive honor and praise from their people. Nevertheless, Homer utilizes the Greek’s romantic obsession with war as an instrument to criticize the violent practice through their actions. A culture formed around war tradition celebrates death and barbarities attitudes that emerge from war.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To have masses of bodies collide for a selfish purpose they are not clear about and to leave families empty handed causes trivial questioning whether justification of war is morally supported. Language is a strategy who emotionally connects us and can also breaks us apart from existence itself. There are many discussions regarding war, but with the power of his words, he’s able to plant the seed in their reader’s mind to start questioning the existence of such a bloody…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘ He shot randomly, almost casually, quick little spurts in the belly and the butt, “ (O’Brien 75). The use of the term “automatic,” shows how Rat’s first impulse was violent. His unconscious decision to use violence demonstrates the cruelty that occurs when war is portrayed as a problem solver similar to Wilhelm’s rape in the above example. Additionally, the insanity these soldiers develop alters their definition of beauty, making them find beauty in war since they cope to their new environment. Clarke supports Wilhelm by arguing The Village represents the very nature of American imperialism as it shows the notion of bringing change through the use violence.…

    • 2186 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The purpose of On War by James Boswell was to tell his personal thought on the irrationality of war. Within Boswell’s essay he describes how ineffective people are in the way they think, or do…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles may have been written in an effort to stop World War I and bring peace between the opposing countries, but it 's outcome was much more harmful. Most facts show and support that the Treaty of Versailles failed in many ways, which therefore lead to World War I. Some facts that help me prove my point include, the treaty highly offended Germany causing them to want revenge, the treaty diminished Germany 's economy, and the treaty affected Germany 's military. All of these points show how the Treaty was responsible for World War II, and how it failed in many different ways. Also, these atrocities made Germany very vulnerable, and lead to the rise in power of Adolf Hitler.…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics