Criminal Justice Trends Evaluation Essay

1527 Words Jul 9th, 2013 7 Pages
Criminal Justice Trends Evaluation
University of Phoenix
Contemporary Issues and Future in Criminal Justice

People in society continuously change therefore people continue to evolve as our perceptions change. In this paper the student will assess the past, present, and future trends in the interface between elements of the criminal justice system. In the assessment the student will evaluate the criminal justice connections with surrounding society. The student will identify the recent and future trends affecting the criminal justice system. Last, the contemporary issues and the value of the criminal justice system in a changing society.
Interface between Components The American Justice in the 1800s was quite
…show more content…
The death penalties still exist in the United States but many states have abolished such a punishment with life in prison. In 1999 the United States had 271 prisoners on death row whereas 15,000 murders were reported to the police (Capital Punishment, 2012). States today that abolished the death penalty are Michigan, Maine, and Iowa including 13 other states and Dist. of Columbia. States that still enforce the death penalty are Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Texas including 30 other states the U.S. Gov’t and the U.S. Military (Death Penalty Information Center, 2012). The student believes the death penalty should be enforced for the most heinous crimes committed. Circumstance in a case should be an open book as this will determine if the death penalty applies. As a citizen chooses to commit and act of violence toward another person the punishment is up to the court system to enforce the punishment that fits the crime.
Connections with Surrounding Society Connections with surrounding society leave many to believe that the criminal justice system concerning the death penalty is an international movement against capital punishment. Most European and Latin Amercian nations have outlawed capital punishment. The United Nations resolution was more countries sponsored an international reduction in executions (Muraskin, 2009, p. 373-374). Executions worldwide account for 94 % internationally including the United States, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and

Related Documents