Article Analysis: Creating Shared Value

Improved Essays
Introduction
The article, “Creating Shared Value” argues that a company’s success and social growth are interdependent, and seeks to directly address the effort of regaining trust in corporations and business in the modern age. The article postulates that there are three ways to create shared value: redefining commodities and markets, reconceiving productivity in the value system, and empowering local cluster growth. The authors also argue that the creation of shared value is fundamental to business strategy and that it is neither philanthropy nor corporate social responsibility. In my opinion, it is an important study that places social goals to strategic levels, and seeks to regain trust for businesses of the current age. This essay will
…show more content…
The article and the concept it discusses have been met with significant success and substantial practitioner audience. The authors make an eloquent case for the notion that the social effects of are now obvious and cannot be ignored. The idea of creating shared value has been accepted by cooperate giants such as Coca Cola and Nestle and has been included in the European Union. In addition, the article achieves its goals with tremendous success because it places social gaols to strategic levels; the authors explicitly give social goals a strategic relevance. It seeks to regain trust for businesses of the current age. However, the article has its fair share of weaknesses and criticisms. For instance, the authors do not hint at or acknowledge that the concept of shared value is not new as a lot has been written on the subject over the course of the years. In addition, the way the authors put the concept across gives the impression that the concept of shared value is supposed to redefine capitalism but in essence the article seems to revolve around the same things that give capitalism a bad name the first place, such as individual and corporate …show more content…
The authors directly address the effort of regaining trust in corporations and business in the current age of crisis. The article postulates that there are three ways to create shared value: relooking at commodities and markets, reconceiving productivity in the value system, and empowering local cluster growth. The study matters because it places social goals to strategic levels, and seeks to regain trust for businesses of the current age of crisis. Although the concept of CSV is put across eloquently and convincingly by the authors, the article has been criticized by those who favour the purely economic purpose of the firm and shareholder interest maximization. In this regard, future research in this areas should take an encompassing approach that take into consideration the social reality that affect the general perspectives of the purpose of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    a) The stakeholder theory is a strategy that takes stakeholders into consideration when making decisions to achieve higher business performance. Stakeholders are people who affect and are affected by a business’ performance. Other than shareholders or owners, customers, government, employees, and suppliers are some examples of stakeholders. The theory provides an alternative to the shareholder theory, which states that companies must focus only on maximizing the market value of the equity of its existing shareholders. Edward Freeman, who was the first to completely express the theory in 1984, developed the theory to address that era’s business issues, most of which are related to external pressures (e.g.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stockholder Model

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In this essay I will argue that the stakeholder theory in determining the social responsibilities of corporations is morally superior in contrast to the stockholder theory. Managers should have moral obligations toward stakeholders’ interests in the decision-making process, and not merely focus on maximizing profits for shareholders. By referencing Milton Friedman, Edward Freeman and Joseph Heath’s papers on corporate social responsibilities, I will first criticize Friedman’s stockholder approach is morally intolerable because his approach treats some stakeholders as means, which is not common-sense morality. Instead, my view is consistent with Heath’s view about the stockholder model that the fiduciary obligation for managers toward shareholders…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carroll and Shabana (2010) retort that Friedman (1970) may believe in a business’ priority to make as much profit as possible but Friedman (1970) does say that this should be done within legal and ethical constraints and thus indicates that the only component of the pyramid that Friedman disapproves of is philanthropic responsibilities. In today’s business market engaging in philanthropic responsibilities is seen as the norm and comes under the stakeholder theory, where the business must take into account the interests of groups that have any sort of dealings with the business where they may be impacted; including customers, suppliers, communities and employers (Gibson 2000). Benefits that come about from employing CSR initiatives are that of reducing costs and risks not so much in the short time but the viability of the business in the long term, whereby volunteer initiatives of the company in social and environmental problems will allow positive impacts from society in effect flexibility from future governmental regulations, and any sort of tax disadvantages (Carroll and Shabana 2010). This benefit works like clockwork where reducing negative social impacts now will result in future positive effects, and in turn the viability of the…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stakeholder Theory

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This describes how the stakes of each are coordinated with one another, affecting the other in terms of harms, benefits, rights and/or duties. The main idea behind the stakeholder theory is for a company or corporation to be successful I mean isn’t that what everyone would want a corporation that is helping them stay financially afloat. Owners and leader then must decide what opportunities to take and what factors work into bringing all the primary stakeholders together. It is then their responsibility to develop relationships with other stakeholders in order for their corporation to travel to new heights of success. In traditional ways the shareholder view was viewed as only the owners or stockholders of a company or corporation and that no matter what that company put the needs of those people…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Similarly, Global Corporate Social Responsibility Policies Project, (2003) in their publication stated that CSR is business ethical values indicating respect for workers, communities, and environment. McWilliams and Siegel (2001) submitted that CSR is corporate actions and practices that go beyond the benefit of the firm and legal obligation in furtherance of some Social good. In contrast to many others Marsdenn, (2001) says CSR is not a philanthropic act, neither is it an optional add-on rather it is the behaviour of a corporation whereby cognizance is taken of the impact of its activities on the society/environment, taking account of both positive and negative impact and yet running a profitable business Hopkins, (2003) admits that corporate stakeholders exist both within and outside firm. His concern is that CSR is the treating of these stakeholders in an ethical or responsible manner. Jones (1980) opines that CRS is an obligation that goes beyond the owner of business (stakeholders), prescribed law or union contract.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Normative Ethical Theories

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Different business schools and researchers have been strongly arguing in favor of this theory. They express that the solely purposes of a business is to maximize profit and keep the interest and benefits of shareholders. (Admin, 2013) Managers are liable for profit maximization and keeping benefits of the shareholders. Hence, managers have fiduciary relationship with the shareholders. This implies that, managers’ objective is to run the business and to make profit by adhering to the basic rule of the society and law.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This article highlights the concept of strategy and other crucial factors for a sustainable competitive advantage of a business without losing its (uniqueness) position in the market. Porter (1996) emphasizes that management tools such as benchmarking, outsourcing, partnering, and engineering have drastically taken the place of strategy. Due to the fact that management fails to distinguish between operational effectiveness and strategy, these management tools improve the operational effectiveness of a business without preserving its sustainable profitability. He states that operational effectiveness and strategy function in different ways, but they are both critical for high and superior performance that represent the ultimate goal for any…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of “social responsibility of a business” has always been a debatable topic. Many argue that a business has much more responsibility than just focusing on the increase of profits. For example, the environment, the consumers, the employees etc. They think these factors should be some of the primary focuses of a corporation. In this research paper I am analyzing that businesses and corporation’s social responsibility is to be socially responsible while increasing profits because that is what they are developed to do.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the article, if the framework that is used for core business is used for social responsibility, then CSR is a source of opportunity, innovation and competitive advantage. A new approach is proposed to develop a relationship between business and society that does not treat corporate success and social welfare as a zero-sum game. The framework which can be used by the companies to identify possible social consequences of action, to discover the opportunities to benefit the society and themselves, to discover CSR initiative to address, and to find the most effective way to do so. Successful corporations need a healthy society and vice versa. The effective integration of CSR can increase the opportunities, efficiency, innovation, heathy environment free from…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Welch Way Analysis

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Can consumers rely on ethics and the process of self-regulation as a useful way of controlling managerial and corporate conduct? Ideally consumers should be able to rely on the free market to guide business conduct effectively, making government intervention unneeded. However, the capabilities of a self-regulated system is highly revolved around individual business culture. Upon evaluation of America’s moral climate, ethical theories and business ethics in practice, the reliability of ethical conduct as a self-regulating force for managers and corporate leaders in the United States will be evaluated. Corporate misconduct has been an ongoing issue for business in the United States and worldwide.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays