Consequentialism: The Elemental Idea Of Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
The elemental idea of Utilitarianism is that actions are morally right only if and because they produce the greatest good. The greatest good in this case pertains to taking in all the effects of the action, be they long or immediate, and taking in to account everyone that will be affected. The net effect of the action is then formulated by subtracting the sum of bad effects from the good. Furthermore, Utilitarianism is a doctrine that all actions should be judged in terms of their utility in promoting the greatest good for the greatest number.
The general principle of Utilitarianism is elemental is composition. One of most importance is consequentialism. Consequentialism is the theory that the rightness of an action is always a function solely of its consequences. Utilitarian consequentialists in turn define right acts as whatever will produce the outcome with the greatest net balance of value over disvalue. Utilitarians, in short, want people to act on the principle that increases net benefits. The default stance for Utilitarianism is of course that we are just as responsible and culpable for what we let happen as for what we do ourselves. More specifically, allowing someone to die because you failed to save them is just as bad as killing them, and not saving two or more persons is worse. Therefore, it follows that not killing somebody if that is
…show more content…
But this must be done at the risk of destroying his values. If Jim walks away he maintains and upholds his morals, and he has not committed any moral breach. However, if he kills one of the prisoners, he has acted immorally. Ultimately, Jim’s refusal to kill one person to save the others is a result of his obligation to categorical imperatives. Jim’s maxim in this situation is that it is not okay to kill. Thus, Jim the deontologist would be morally obligated to walk away from the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    It is a form of consequentialism (i.e. the morality of an action should be judged by its consequences) which states that “an act is right if and only if when compared with all options, it maximizes the existence of pleasure in the whole world” (Bentham). In simpler terms, utilitarianism advocates for the “greatest good for the greatest number.” For example, say you were trapped in a falling elevator with five individuals. You have two options: 1) Kill one of the occupants so the elevator can stop its rapid descent and the remaining five people can get to safety; or 2) refuse to harm anyone but have everyone (including yourself) die from the impact of the elevator striking the ground. What should you do?…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. How might utilitarianism be used to resolve dilemma 4 (pg. 132 of Jones)? Do you agree with this resolution? Why or why not?…

    • 1308 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Utilitarianism principles support the idea that decisions must be based on what will benefit the largest number of people. Each person’s actions are added to the overall utility of the community impacted by those actions. Utilitarianism is focus on the net result of their actions instead of the means or motives that generated the reason for their actions. It is doing by intrinsic rewards which the personal satisfaction from benefiting others.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are three principles that make up classical act utilitarianism. They are principle of hedonism, principle of consequentialism, and principle of equality. The principle of hedonism is pleasure or enjoyment is the only thing that is valuable…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Regarding Moral Reasoning and Privacy Rights Utilitarianism is essentially a doctrine within the study of ethics that focuses on the pleasures and pains of an individual in regard to their actions being beneficial to a majority. The principle question the doctrine seeks to answer is, “What ought a man to do?”, with the outcome being his actions provide the best results possible. As a branch of consequentialism (which, on a wider scale, focuses on an action’s outcome being determined by its consequences), utilitarianism is focused on a measure of pains and pleasures which maximize net utility for all people conclusively affected. While there are some cases in which the best available option doesn’t maximize pleasure or pain,…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to this distinction, act and rule utilitarians have different responses to the two problems posed by Carritt. In response to the arctic explorers, act utilitarians would have a couple ways to defend utilitarianism. First, they could deny that the alleged consequences, the weakening of promises and justice, are genuine consequences. In order to do this, the act utilitarian would have to claim that an error was made in assessing the consequences. It is possible that not all the relevant consequences were considered, and that a true consideration of all consequences would result in different consequences where Carritt’s criticism would be irrelevant.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In society, when an individual faces a situation where a moral dilemma arises they must make an ethical decision. One approach is the utilitarian theory where one considers the consequences that arise from their decision. Another approach is deontological ethics where one considers the morality of their actions. Using Andrew Bailey’s First Philosophy: Second Edition I will further explain my points on both utilitarianism and deontology, and explain why I believe Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology is flawed using the trolley problem. I will argue that John Stuart Mill’s theory of utilitarianism is a more appropriate approach to moral dilemmas, as making calculated decisions in consequentialism results in better outcomes for society.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Utilitarianism

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Finally, Ethical Universalism [utilitarianism] is a theory expounded by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) that the ethically right thing to do is the action that produces most utility/ benefits than other acts. Under Utilitarianism, individuals do not merely look to their own pleasure, but are concerned with maximizing pleasure for all [“greatest happiness for the greatest number” principle] including future generations. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), Bentham’s disciple, modified the theory by recognizing different human characteristics rather than placing equal values on ‘pleasures’ as goals. The basic idea of Utilitarianism is “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness”…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this essay I will be talking about the Utilitarian and Libertarian on the taxation issue I will do that by giving both definitions of Utilitarian and Libertarian, and give their views on taxation then argue against the one I believe that it not just then argue in support of the one I believe it’s just. Utilitarianism is a belief that the right course of action is the one that will produce the greatest happiness of the greatest number of people, it could be said that it’s to maximise the happiness of many people. Libertarianism suggest that people should be free, think the way they like and to do whatever thing they wish to do as long as it doesn’t violate other right to do the same. On the taxation issue utilitarian says that taxation…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical and unethical conduct and decision often result from the emergence of a situation that advances either an ethical deliberation or concern. According to Ferrell and Fraedrich (2016), an ethical issue represents a challenge, opening or situation necessitating an individual or organization to choose from a range of options and that must be appraised as morally right or wrong. Notable, It is important to understand that ethical issues can be interpreted in various ways and are uncertain in the future. Also, ethical issues can be problematic because they induce or incorporate some form of dilemma.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is the idea that "moral action should be about producing happiness in the world, the more happiness it produces, the better it is" (Garcia, Slide 6). The idea of Utilitarianism can be broken down into two forms; One being Act Utilitarianism and the second being Rule Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism is when "an act is morally right just because it maximizes overall well-being, or at least is expected to" (Garcia, Slide 6), while Rule Utilitarianism is when "actions are morally right just because they would be required by social rules that are created to promote overall well-being" (Garcia, Slide 6). In addition to Utilitarianism's break down it has a moral standard that is true to both forms, known as the Principle of Utility.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics has a great impact on people whenever they are facing a difficult or biased situation. It depends on what ethical philosophies that people believe in, which would justify their actions towards a specific problem. The goal of this paper is to reflect the different responses of bystanders under two different ethical approaches, which are the utilitarianism or the deontology approach. According to the textbook (Introducing Philosophy through Pop Culture: From Socrates to South Park, Hume to House, 1st Edition), the author has used the moral dilemma of the trolley problem to examine ethical responses. (Irwin & Johnson, 2010)…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays