Similarities Between Aristotle And John Stuart Mill

Improved Essays
Aristotle’s ethics and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism differ greatly when explaining where an individual’s happiness is. Mill states that pleasure and relief/freedom from pain are what compose an individual’s happiness. On the contrary, Aristotle believes that happiness comes from virtue. Happiness is a widely discussed topic and both John Stuart Mill and Aristotle spent a lot of time contemplating it. They both agreed on one aspect of happiness. They both came to the final conclusion that in order to attain genuine happiness, men should be engaging in activities that are specific to humans.
Aristotle argues that and individual practicing their virtues is what ultimately leads to their happiness. Aristotle states that “virtue is a trained faculty or habit.” (Aristotle) This implies that the habit of choosing the thing that makes a person good leads to happiness.
…show more content…
Aristotle believes that contemplation is the highest action a human can perform and helps an individual reach their maximum potential. To Aristotle, contemplation is defined as refining and discovering virtues. According to Aristotle, reaching this “maximum potential” helps humans reach happiness. In today’s modern world, many think that happiness is something plain like money, success, or fame. Many people deeply believe that these materialistic things are the root of all happiness; however I side with Aristotle on his point. Aristotle says it’s what we do in our life, not we gain from life like money or success, which helps us find happiness. He says that “the good is the final end, and happiness is this.” (Aristotle) He argues that everything we do is “for the sake of the end”. When Aristotle says this, he means that we all do everything for our final end, which is our happiness. Aristotle also believes that happiness cannot happen instantly. In modern times, we want to feel full happiness immediately, so we do things like

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    They both agree on happiness being the highest good. These two philosophers see eye to eye on one aspect of happiness. For them, to attain true happiness, men should engage in activities that are distinct to humans.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his book, Mill speaks of many clarifications and objections to his own principle as a way to disregard critics of utilitarianism. Because he is utilitarian, one of the most important clarifications of his idea of happiness that he offers is that it does not matter if one person is unhappy. What matters the most to Mill is that a greater number of are collectively happy. Therefore, the unhappy person would have to sacrifice their own happiness so everyone else can achieve it. Mill also believes that there is no such thing as true happiness because happiness cannot be achieved without a little pain.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed in two different states that each person has; the Good and the End (“Moral Philosophy”). When describing the Good, Socrates explains that people unconsciously do things that make them happy and that physical objects make one feel satisfied at the same time (“Moral Philosophy”). The whole idea of the Good is that humans act in a positive way and that they just want to live a happy and meaningful life (Moral Philosophy”). Happiness is the one thing all humans want to have in their lives and the Good is that explanation. The End is the other idea Socrates had and goes along with the Good.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is thought to be something that gratifies the person’s ability. In other words, if an individual participates in something that is satisfying then that individual is happy. Achieving happiness must compare to balance of pleasure and self-reliance. When a person achieves happiness then they have designed and followed their own virtues and lived out those virtues to the ultimate possibility. Happiness cannot be described by the amount of pleasure.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Herodotus 550) Aristotle notices this and says those who work for the betterment of the whole nation is great. (Aristotle, 38) Through people not being equal, a race to be the best has occurred which leads civilizations to fall and new ones to rise to new heights. Both Herodotus and Aristotle hint at how in order for humans to flourishing, they must be happy. Aristotle explains how everyone is born with moral virtue which means through work we can become virtuous. (41) The effort to use this potential is up to that person if they want to become virtuous and ultimately happy.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill argues that the sole basis of morality in a society in happiness and that everyone desires to be happy. He explains that every other object is a means to happiness or an item of happiness. He explains that justice and human rights exist in a society because they are necessary for people’s happiness. This theory has however being criticized in for many reasons.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle called this form of happiness virtue. When he introduced this in his essay he said “It goes without saying that the virtue we are to study is human virtue, just as the good that we have been inquiring about is human good, and the happiness a human happiness.” (para 30, Aristotle, pg 388). Naturally, these examples as a whole show that it is difficult to be a person with this trait as honor and virtue go hand in hand but in…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Chuang Tzu states in Basic Writings that those who live their lives according to The Way is how a person can live to their fullest potential. While there are similarities between the philosopher’s views, they each have main factors in their ideas that set them apart from each other. “Eudaimonia” is the term that Aristotle uses to describe happiness, living life as fully as possible and fulfilled. He also says happiness is the highest good, and the means to reaching this state are to be virtuous (Pol. 7.8).…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although all of our souls are not the same, Aristotle states that personal happiness is the goal of ethics that all human beings strive towards. He claims this due to the way we behave being directly related to virtue and vice. Happiness lies in the middle grounds of excess of virtue and excess of vice. By pinpointing this middle ground, the best action can be determined. Happiness is then a common ground for how to live a good life.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They both believed that the purpose of human actions was to be happy, which would lead to a good life. For Aristotle, he believed that we strive towards goals in order to find happiness (telos). He also believed that nobody pursues happiness for the sake of something else. Therefore, Aristotle concluded that happiness makes life worthwhile. For Epicurus, he believed that human pleasure was the ultimate happiness.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays