Comparing The Arguments Of Pain, Suffering And Death

Decent Essays
● Premise 1: We have a (presumptive) duty to desist from bringing into existence new members of species that cause (and will likely continue to cause) vast amounts of pain, suffering, and death.
● Premise 2: Humans cause vast amounts of pain, suffering, and death.
________________________________________
● Conclusion: Therefore, we have a (presumptive) duty to desist from bringing new humans into existence. (p.79 Debating Procreation: Is It Wrong to Reproduce? David Benatar)

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Second Argument Evaluation, Singer: Morality’s Ambivalent Behavior in the Face of Affluence In the piece “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer puts forth his argument that “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything else morally significant, we ought, morally, to do it,” (Cahn, 505). In his argument Singer claims that men have the moral responsibility to prevent suffering when it does not negatively impact “himself or his dependents” (Cahn, 508), and that the refusal of this prescribed human duty makes him morally incompetent. The extended example that Singer uses as the basis of his argument is the mass famine that struck East Bengal in the 1970s, an issue that received much media coverage, yet—despite its fame—received little help from affluent countries and their constituents. In using this example, Singer exemplifies the ignorance of the prosperous bodies as they chose to allow tragedy to strike…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Herzog Human Morality

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Humans, today, conflict with the problem of how humane it is to test and murder animals such as mice and worms. Despite having a viewpoint in “the troubled middle”, Harold Herzog discusses the moral line drawn from the killing of different species in his article, “Human Morality and Animal Research.” He looks over the moral obligations and historical context resulted from the murder of worms to mice to kittens to humans. Herzog discusses patterns between the human morality and situational error when faced with a problem of animal cruelty and research.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Worldwide population growth is an issue that grows more and more urgent with each passing day. Our earth is nearing its capacity, and its important that we address this issue to avoid a worldwide state of emergency. Garrett Hardin and Clark Wolf both discuss this issue in detail, and offer their own solutions on how we should solve this problem. However, while Hardin presents a valid view of our world population problems, Wolf provides a more well rounded argument, and goes further to provide reasonable, effective solutions that target the true source of the issue. Garrett Hardin, in his essay “Lifeboat Ethics,” describes the problem of current world population growth, and how we are making this already very serious issue even worse by living…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There six functions of the family,that Shirley Zimmerman has summarized that if fulfilled will fulfill the necessary roles in society.however if society no longer motivates individuals to carry out these responsibilities,neither the society or the institution of family will survive. Functions of the family Addition of new members through procreation or adoption:Although in the moving the reasoning behind the infertility is unknown,this need for procreation is not being met. Which is detrimental to the progression of society Physical maintenance and care of group members:Only certain individuals are receiving proper physical care,for example, Nigel,Theo cousin who is a government minister who lives in a mansion protected from the chaos. In the…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer has argued that non-persons (both human and non-human) are replaceable, that is, we can kill them if we bring another similar being into existence to compensate for the net loss of utility in the universe. This, known as the replaceability argument, is Singer's most controversial argument, and has been used to justify the practice of animal husbandry when the animals live lives worth living. Singer's position rests on three primary assumptions, two axiological and one metaphysical. First, the axiological presumptions are that death, at least in the case of non-persons, does not have negative value; and that coming into existence has, if the life is worth living, positive value. Additionally, Singer accepts the Total View.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The whole notion of pain, and how every individual experiences pain, is up for debate. We don 't know how another person experiences pain - physical pain or psychic pain. Some of these clinics where assisted suicide or euthanasia is practiced, they call it 'weariness of life. '” (Toews). For many years, those dubbed with the burden of cancer and other terminal illnesses have to suffer through a slow and painful death in the end.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The readings, “Death’s Patriot” in Death, Dismemberment, and Memory by Christon Archer speaks on the Mexican Revolution and the article by Franklin Knight on Haiti speaks on the Haitian Revolution. Throughout History, we have seen many revolutions all over the world. But, specifically, the Mexican Revolution and the Haitian Revolution were both similar because they had similar social and political issues and goals when going against the Europeans. In the Aztec Empire what is now Mexico, Cuauhtemoc tried his best to defend the Aztec capital from the Spaniards, but was then captured and executed, and since then the Spanish have had control of Mexico which they called, New Spain (Johnson: 207).…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    We are being inhumane to force people to continue suffering in this way (Newman, 1996). Choosing for a more painless death comes a lot easier for patients along with family who witness the pain of their loved is enduring with all the medications and treatments (which tend to cause severe side effects). I believe that is justified. Especially knowing that the chances of survival are very slim for the patient. Supports of the mercy killing ask whether it is rational or not to keep a terminally ill patient who’s hopes of survival are slim and alive on a support system when our medical infrastructure is under immense pressure (Naik, 2011).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Argument On Clon-To-Bear

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The aptness to perception exultation, sorrow, indignation, and detestation are an definite integral part of our "earthborn beingness," and we do not teach to lay open such falsify emotions until we dislocate sociably engage with others. In the article that follow, we will explain more distinctly why Members of the Council are not assure by the arguments for cloning-to-furnish-offspring, even in the most tenable plight. To see why this is so, we emergency to observe clon-to-bear-spawn from the broadest likely maxim perspective, inception with ethical topic regarding try on man subjects. It made the presentations as part of a prosperous exertion to raise $132 million in fresh chief during January. Anti-choicers also use the describe "humankind…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal rights activists have gained considerable attention in the past few decades through education of the public. The exposure of animal cruelty has led more people to support the need for animal rights. The question now is not whether or not animals deserve rights. Instead, the question is what should those rights be and how far should they extend. A key factor that determines what rights an individual deserves is dignity.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Epicurus, Lucretius, and Nagel are philosophers with very different views on death, and whether death is bad for the person who dies. Their understanding of life and what happens when it ceases, is the distinguishing factor. Epicurus was a philosopher who understood the universe and life as being composed of matter in the form of small particles. He stated that when one dies, the particles which make up our existence dissolve and our consciousness comes to an end. He considers what he understands to be mental and physical pain and pleasures to determine the various aspects of life.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic I chose to do research on for the brochure and the position paper was the controversial issue of lethal injections; if it goes against the Constitution or not. The most interesting thing I have learned throughout my research is that one of the drugs used in the lethal injection, sodium thiopental, is commonly used for general surgery. It puts the prisoner into a medically induced coma. The two other drugs used are pancuronium bromide and potassium bromide. Pancuronium bromide stops neuromuscular activity to skeletal muscles which enables movement.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Right to Die” is this a choice or is this a choice that society should be allowed to make? The controversy over someone choosing to end their life when dealing with a terminal illness with a physician’s help is the rights of the patient and not the right of society to choose. People who are dealing with terminal illness should have a choice to die or not with their doctor’s help. In a physician-assistant suicide the doctor prescribes the medication that will end a patient’s life, but the patient has to be able to take the medication which will result in death.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays