The essential comparability between Kant's morals and utilitarianism is that there is a target Good which can be looked for. Kant contended that one should act in a way that can be willed for every other individual. For instance, you shouldn't lie since you wouldn't need every other person to lie, as well. Utilitarianism contends that one should act in a way that creates the best useful for the best number of individuals. Utilizing a similar case, one shouldn't lie if forgoing the lie would deliver all the more useful for a more prominent number of individuals. There is likewise the qualification between act-utilitarianism and administer utilitarianism, yet I won't sloppy the waters with the contrasts between those two. Regardless, Kant's view
