Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King And Gandhi

Improved Essays
Eassy 2 Its pretty much next to impossible when talking about human rights and not being able to mention Martin Luther King and Mohanda Gandhi. Both men are consider iconic figurers in the fight for human rights, and both have shared the same ideas and philosophies. Both firmly believed that non-violence methods was the best way to bring change to the world and to stop chaos from taking place. Though they both shared the same beliefs, both men had some differences in approaching the matter at hand. While Martin Luther King strived in using tactics of non-violence protest and marches to influence the media to gain equal right for all, Gandhi used fasting and composed general ideas and rules of how one can be a non-violence individual (passive resister) that all could follow to brake away from a nation. But did both mens belief stay …show more content…
Gandhi offers guidance to being a passive resister by writing, “only those who can realize that is something in man which is superior to the brute nature in him, and that latter always yields to it, can effectively be passive resisters”(446). So in a sense to resistance to fight even when the person does deserve it. But this Is were ones circumstance comes into play while gandhi was writing to an audience who deeply respects him and agree with his ideas, Martin Luther in the Letter from Birmingham Jail is writing to an audience who have seemed to back stab him a are starting to fall off as his followers. My statement is supported when King himself writes “While confined here in the Birmingham city jail, I came across your recent statement calling my present activities “unwise and un timely”(213). He goes on further saying he feels that that the men who are calling him out are “genuine good will” and they their “criticisms are sincerely set forth”(214). You probably must imaging that king was being fairly sarcastic when he wrote that

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi are constantly hailed as the world’s examples of peaceful protest, the two achieving opposite goals with equal success without unnecessary violence. The two shared similarities of being strongly rooted in religion but in opposite manners. Gandhi’s methods exclusively catered to the religious with many of his ideas crossing a “point at which the humanistic and the religious attitudes cease to be reconcilable” (Orwell, 4). His philosophies rely heavily on the followers aligning with the same religious beliefs that he lived all aspects of his life by. Both men lived religious lives with Dr. King “being the son, the grandson and the great-grandson of preachers” (King) and Gandhi living an ascetic life completely governed by his religious beliefs.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were both very prominent religious figures. Malcolm X was a Muslim and King was a Christian. King was a son of a Baptist preacher, and he wanted to do the same thing as his father. That is when he decided he wanted to get involved in civil rights.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many today consider Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. to be revolutionary men. Though these two men had similar goals for changes in the African American communities, they are perceived differently. Though Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were well-known Civil Rights Activists, they were significantly different men with the common goal of aiding their fellow members of the African-American community. Malcolm X and MLK had similar religious upbringing because their fathers taught in Baptist churches.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a citizen in a country you must obey the laws of the land and not be a troublemaker in society. For Martin Luther King Jr, Crito and Socrates, they have different views on how to do things as a citizen; King wants to disobey laws in order to end racism in the south, Crito wants to get Socrates out of jail, and Socrates wants to serve his death sentence because that’s what he believes is the right thing to do. In Birmingham, Alabama, in 1963 Martin Luther King was locked up in a jail cell for protesting peacefully against discrimination. While sitting in his cell, King wrote an open letter to tell people that it is morally right to disobey laws that seem unfair and take direct action rather than waiting for the courts to do something about…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Racism is one of the larger social issues of the modern world. It has affected millions of people worldwide and is one of the biggest social problems in history. While many great leaders and outstanding speakers have stood up and tried to fight this issues, two who stand out to me are, Martin Luther king Jr, a revolutionary speaker everyone learns to know as a child, and Stokely Carmicheal, a less known speaker with a very different method of sharing his ideas. Although King and Carmicheal both agree racism and slavery are inhuman acts that needed to be stopped, each had different ways to relay their messages. "I Have A Dream...", The speech given by Martin Luther King Jr that inspired thousands of all races to fight for equality, and work…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that complete freedom will bring chaos to individuals because humans need some sort of leadership, and some believe that freedom brings only opportunities to show how great some people truly are. These two contrasting views on freedom are explained through the philosophical texts and views of Martin Luther King Jr and Thomas Hobbes. Martin Luther King Jr enlightened the entire world with his views in Love, Law and Civil Disobedience and Thomas Hobbes showed the world a new side of political philosophy with his work in Leviathan. In both of these works one can see the contrasting views on freedom and can judge what influenced these views based on the time period that these philosophers lived.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X shared the idea that everyone should be treated equal regardless of color. Their passion for civil rights and what they achieved makes them world figures. While they both fought for what they believed, the approach they used was completely different. Martin Luther King came from a long family line of pastors. He grew up in Atlanta with a good family and he was very well educated.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The innovative ways of King and Gandhi led to success through nonviolence. In contrast to past centuries’ extreme violence, the 20th century revolutionaries found a way to succeed without using “the sword.” From Gandhi’s disciples, to King’s civil rights advocates, these men (and their followers) applied their deep religious conviction to their causes. Ultimately, this led to a revolutionization of revolutions because nonviolence had never been deployed…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Linh H. Paper #3 Racial segregation has been one of the issues that have been fighting for so many decades, and that has never come to an end. The wave of discrimination between blacks and whites has become acuter after WWII that led to two people full of standing up for a fight for justice are Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Even though they had the same goal that fighting for the freedom of African-American people, each of them has different view and strategies, and that has caused fierce debate among the two groups. When Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. choose the way to fight nonviolence, while Malcolm X is the opposite. Yet, before going into why the choice of fighting non-violence not only bring good results but the consequence also…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You have to be a courageous person to be able to resist violence on evil. Also you must fight, not in a violent way, for justice and what is right. I remember I had a decision be calm and nonviolent or go attack I decided to be calm and try to resolve in a reasonable manner. Martin Luther King Junior was like many other activists but he left a legacy that many people know as he helped shape the world and freed people of that time of the thought of African-American people being slaves or them being segregated from the…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In similar time periods in the Eastern Hemisphere, two men were leading movements with the same goal - to expel Western civilization from their countries. Although these two men had the same goal in mind, the methods through which they hoped to achieve these goals were drastically different. In Africa, Franz Fanon was calling for a violent removal of the French from Algeria through his book The Wretched of the Earth. In Asia, M.K. Gandhi was writing his pleas to the Indian people to push the British out of India through far less violent means. If these two men are fighting for the same cause, how is it that their methods were so different?…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cesar Chavez and Gandhi are different person but they are the same in a way. They had fought for the same thing and that is for there rights both of they fought right thing. Like Cesar Chavez he had fought for farmers rights and the most famous thing he had said was “Si, se puede”. Also Gandhi had fought for being free from the British that had ruled India and South Africa at the time. But I think that Cesar Chavez is a better hero they Gandhi because Cesar help farmer by get they better pay and better conditions for working.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi, leader of the Indian independence movement, saw nonviolence as an “end in itself” where one is able to see the true nature of things. Similarly, Albert Schweitzer, a Christian missionary, saw the nonhuman world as sacred and held a deep respect for all life. My paper will take a comparative look at both men and their practice of non-violence in ways that promote oneness between humans and nonhumans. I will also take a comparative look at the two men and their differing rationale and language between humans and nonhumans in distinct situations. In the next paragraphs, I will take a look at Gandhi and Schweitzer’s early life and influences behind their philosophies of non-violence in regards to nonhumans.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever read the stories about the hard workers Gandhi or Nelson Mandela? If not you are going to learn a little more about how they both fought hard for human rights. Mahatma Gandhi were both great fighters for human rights. Both men were fighting for their people in their country that were being oppressed. In The Eulogy for Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela’s autobiography, we see the differences these two leaders made, not only in their lives, but the lives of everyone who has been oppressed.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays