Code Of Ethical Violations

Amazing Essays
Mr. Salesperson committed two ethics violations. According to Article 1 of the Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice of the National Association of Realtors, realtors owe a duty to their clients to honestly protect and promote the clients’ interests (Realtor.com, 2015). Upon receiving the termination of contract notice, research proved that Mr. Salesperson accepted a higher offer and sold the contracted property to another purchaser. This is in direct violation of Article 1 as interpreted by Standard of Practice 1-8: while acting as the agent for the purchaser, a realtor is obligated to submit offers and counter-offers until the acceptance of an offer (Realtor.com, 2015).
Additionally, Mr. Salesperson verbally agreed, on two different
…show more content…
Michel v. Polos Verdes Network Group, Inc., 67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797, 802 (Ct. App. 2007). Additionally, “a mortgage broker acts in a fiduciary capacity that not only imposes upon him the duty of acting in the highest good faith toward his principal but also precludes the agent from obtaining any advantage over the principal in any transaction had by virtue of his agency.” Brewer v. Indymac Bank, 609 F. Supp. 2d 1104, 1119 (E.D. Cal 2009). From the above statements, it is clear that Mr. Salesperson breached his fiduciary duties when he violated the professional code of …show more content…
Existence of a valid contract can be proven through written documentation. Furthermore, through the breach of fiduciary duties we can show an excuse for non-performance and subsequent failure to perform. Presenting crucial evidence, such as receiving a termination notice regarding the contract to purchase real estate before the earnest money deadline passed, will substantiate the claim. Damages were incurred in the preparation for purchase of the property.
The breach of fiduciary duties can also bring about a suit based on fraudulent conduct. Including a fraud claim to the instant case would be beneficial because both causes of action (breach of duty and fraud) are so intertwined that one may be dependent upon the other. Under California law, Sam Salesperson committed fraud when he promised an extension, but never filed or intended to file said extension, and when he failed to disclose pertinent information regarding the property. Cal. Civ. Code § 1710. Fraud falls under tort law, meaning a civil wrong. To prove a tort was committed, duty, breach of said duty, causation, and damages must be proven. One owes a duty not to cause harm or interfere upon another’s rights. Cal. Civ. Code § 1708. Mr. Salesperson’s fraudulent conduct is the foreseeable proximate cause which breached said duty of care and produced the harm

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Since James Hardie is listed on ASX, the company is obligated to disclose relevant information as per the listing rules of ASX. In addition, any information that a reasonable person would expect to be market sensitive and can potentially impact on the price or value of a company’s security, must be immediately disclosed to ASX, as mentioned under Chaper 3 of the ASX Listing Rules. With the reference to our case, the above rules imply that the directors of James Hardie have also failed the obligations of continuous disclosure in relation to the misleading and deceptive misstatement about the legal indemnity for asbestos claims, as they were aware of the statement and did not provide any supplementary document to correct the deficiency. Conclusion James Hardie and its directors have clearly contravened their obligations of continuous disclosure and breached directors’ duties under both general and statutory law, given the fact that they have made and approved misleading statements about the company’s underfunded asbestos compensation foundation. Therefore, the High Court ruled against the directors and the overturned decision made by the New South Wales Court of Appeal, and hence ordered the case to be returned to the Appeal Court to decide the outstanding matter including penalties which are set out in sections 1317E and 1317G of the…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the reasons for why the courts enforce secret trusts can be explained by the fraud theory. Fraud theory is based on the maxim that “equity will not permit a statute to be used as an instrument of fraud”. [8] Equity will not permit the secret trustee to keep the property fraudulently to themselves relying on failing to comply with Wills Act’s requirements such as the terms not in signed writing, but instead will ensure them to hold the property on trust. [8] In this context, “fraud” should be understood as failing to give effect to the final intention of the testator by the secret trustee who has promised to carry out the trust obligation but then frustrate testator’s wishes and sacrifice the interest of the secret beneficiaries. In this…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In arbitration, the parties are required to conform to the rules governing the process and include accepting the imposed decision by the arbitrator. This process is disadvantageous as compared to a litigation process because it conforms to the same procedure but with dire consequences. A binding arbitration is without an appeal and its ruling is final despite the objections of either party. Under the law, fraud entails any deliberate deception for self gain (Alghamdi, 2011). Using the evidence provided for in this court relating to the records in the odometer disclosure form by the Mason’s, this court rules that they committed fraud and should therefore be entitled to pay any consequential costs arising from the fraud.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rule 10b-5 bars any person from making a misstatement or omission of material fact in relation to the purchase or sale of any security. The wrongful act was in association with the national securities exchange, which is one of the requirements of Rule 10b-5. A purchaser of a security is able to sue an auditor who has misstated or omitted a material fact without requiring privity. The defendant must have acted with scienter, intent to deceive, which isn’t the case in this situation therefore I wouldn’t be found liable under Rule 10b-5. (Mallor, 2010, p. 1202) IV.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jack Singer Case Study

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “In theft the owner of the thing stolen has no intention to part with his property therein to the person taking it, while in the case of deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means the owner does intend to part wit his property in the money or chattel, but is is obtained from him by an act of deliberate deception, practised with the object of gaining something of recognized value from the owner to his prejudice.” (R. v. Lake, [1953] O.R. 1009 C.A. ) Having regards to the distinction between theft and fraud that has just been mentioned, the trial judge did in fact err in convicting the appellant of theft in addition to fraud. The complainant did intend to part with her money, yet she was induced to do so by “other fraudulent means.” The fact that the complainant had the intent of parting with her money means that this was not theft, only…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    II. Constructive Eviction To constitute constructive eviction, "there must be some act of permanent character done by the landlord with the intent and effect of depriving the tenant of enjoyment of the premises or some part thereof, to which the tenant yields, abandoning the premises within a reasonable time." Tracy v. Long, 3 N.E.2d 789, 791 (1936). Smith can reasonably expect to prove in trial the above elements, which are not directly negated by contradictory evidence. Hence she can raise issues of material facts with respect to each element, the first three of which will be discussed below.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The manufacturer should be liable for the negligence if their product to cause harm to the users. In such a type of case, it is not necessary for the customers to give notice within a reasonable time to the sellers. While the purpose of the 1769 section of the Civil Code is to protect the seller, and product liability protects the customers’ rights regarding defective products. Another issue arose from this case was whether to emphasize on the Civil Code (section 1769) or product liability when viewing this case. While both parties had their own reasons to defense themselves, it is hard to make a…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Internal control violations There was a total internal auditing division violation of the regulation in the K-Marts case. When the disproportional asset inflation was seen in the company revenues, it should have been immediately reported to the SEC and other concern authorities, but it was not done. In fact, the amount inflated was almost 10% of the total revenues are the inflated revenues. Therefore, internal control mechanisms of Kmart should play the role of the whistleblower policies. The critical and unbiased internal audit should have been worked on to forbid persons making false allegations; they should have informed the concerned people and the agents about the false consequences that would happen in case of false allegations.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is not true since there are defenses to a contract, such as capacity to contract whereby for a contract to be valid, the parties involved must have the capacity to contract. A party gains the capacity to contract once they reach the age of majority and should be of sound mind. In Smith v. King (1892), whereby a firm of brokers sued for damages and it was held that the debt was contracted during minority thereby making it voidable. A contract should be signed without undue influence or misrepresentation or the terms of the contract are grossly unfair or there is a serious inequality of bargaining power. Business owners can avoid these misconceptions by hiring credible internal lawyers to help in drafting of contracts and any other legal requirements in the organization.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge Steagall states “after carefully considering the evidence, we conclude that repayment of the following cost is necessary to more equitably restore the buyers to the position they once occupied before the sale”(Beatty & Samuelson,2015, p. 414). This also includes the non-refundable fees the buyers paid to Northwestern for a loan. Not only that, the judge also states--as was mentioned earlier—that, “we remand this case for the trial court to enter a judgement ordering repayment of these cost”(Beatty & Samuelson,2015, p. 414). Conclusion: Buyer’s remedy is where the seller breaches the contract and the buyer is entitled to certain remedies. In this case, rescission and restitution are at request.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays