Takem's Appliances & Electronics Case Study

Great Essays
The case of Tommy Takem, the owner of Takem’s Appliances & Electronics, LLC against Sally Walker is one of a mistreated sales contract. When Sally Walker purchased the laptop from Takem’s Applicances & Electronics, she entered into a sales contract in which she promised to pay for the laptop. The specific terms of the contract are unknown, as to the price Sally agreed to pay Takem for the laptop, the time period over which the payments would be made, if the contract was written or oral, and so on. It is even unknown whether the contract is even valid at this point. Assuming that at the time Sally purchased the laptop, both she and Takem came to an agreement on all terms, thus entering into a sales contract. The issue is that Sally was unaware …show more content…
Almost all companies sell their products at a markup, that helps to cover the costs of making the product plus a little added to help the company make a profit off the product as well. So the fact that Takem has added a small markup to his products isn’t unethical, but the reasoning behind it is. He marked up the products because he is one of, if not, the only appliance store in that rural area, so he knows that if the people that live there need any appliance of any kind, they will have to come to his store. Also, the fact that most of the people that tend to live in that area are considered uneducated, he could be taking advantage of them by marking up the price of the product because he knows they most likely wouldn’t be comparing prices. This doesn’t apply in the case of Sally Walker, since she seemed to be more educated by the writing of her letter. Based on all the information presented in this paper, Sally does not have any legal grounds to sue Tommy Takem for the contract on the laptop she purchased from him. Takem should reconsider his markup plans and make sure that he is being ethical and fair to all his

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The court decided the contract was a sale of services and was enforceable because the agreement consisted of a…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Price gouging refers to instances when sellers set commodities’ prices at rates that are considered unfair, exploitative and even unethical. However, despite facilitating for unprecedented profits for businessmen, price gouging has numerous benefits. Besides striving to make additional profits in the event of a disaster, businesses have a social responsibility to ensure that victims gain access to essential commodities. Whereas charging extremely high prices to victims of disasters can be viewed as being morally unethical, businesses ought to be applauded for taking the initiative to serve consumers. One of the most significant contributions of price gouging is the fact that it symbolizes a drastic reduction in supplies.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plaintiff Audrey Vokes, a widow of 51 years and without family, had a yen to be an accomplished dancer with the hopes of finding a new interest in life, J. P Davenport d/b/a Davenport’s school of dancing a franchise of Arthur Murray, Inc.) agreed to help make her dreams come true. Vokes over the course of several years signed several contracts with the Defendant and paid out the amount of $31, 090.45 for lessons and dance related trips. At some point the Plaintiff decided her goals have not been accomplished in dancing. Plaintiff sought a rescission of the contracts and a return of her money, based on allegations of fraud.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Clean Machines Company is correct that no contract exists. The governing law in this case is the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) due to the items in question being goods that if there was a contract would be severable by the seller (pg. 359). Clean Machines Company offered to sell Dealers Appliance Outlet washing machines for a price over the phone, keeping the offer open for ninety days. Clean Machines Company did not incur any legal detriment in the offer and thus, no consideration was valid. Both common law and the UCC state that “an offer can be revoked at any time prior to acceptance”, unless there is valid consideration included in the offer (pg. 367).…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Psy 230 Week 4

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This case has multiple issues that need to be discussed and clarified. First of all, Cory advances an advertisement regarding selling his computer. He then affirms that the binding will start according to the date of the acceptance. His first offer comes by email, but encounters some faults that delay its arrival. The email is followed by a fax that counter-offers the initial proposed price.…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem was resolved by Poelitz, but left the defendant upset and made him believe any decisions he makes in the future will be overwritten. The defendant had then terminated his contract with Intel's SSD and stated that he “hadn't left SSD on the best of terms.” His passwords on all SSD computers, save for one, were disabled so that he would no longer be able to access the systems. The one computer, Brillig, that did not disable his password was left unintentionally. The defendant had continued working as an independent contractor for a different division in Intel.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car? A legal contract should clearly state the terms of reference. For the case of the buyer and the seller, the contract must state the price of the commodity and other details such as the condition of the commodity. For the case of purchasing a car, the sales agreement is a legal contract signed by both the seller and the buyer. For Jim and Laura, they did not sign any legal written document binding them to buy the said car.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jerry Useem has written “How Online Shopping Makes Suckers of Us All” to show the online shoppers and readers of “The Atlantic” how price discrimination occurs. He has decided to speak about the problem with online prices since there has been a rise in the number of online shoppers. In the article, “How Online Shopping Makes Suckers of Us All,” Jerry Useem starts off by explaining how the prices of certain products vary depending on when the customer looks at the product. To add on, he goes on to inform us that in the past, buyers and sellers would have to go through haggling in order to get the best deal possible, he then compares the haggling to how people get the best deals now. Furthermore, he presents to us information about price discrimination and the different ways in which it…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    GE International, Inc.(GEII) and CSC (Computer System Consultant) are two computer based companies. I represent CSC who received a contract opportunity from GEII to reprogram their computers with new software and update to the latest version. Various requirements from both the sides were discussed and iterated. However, after conferring with the senior manager of GEII, CSC finds that there are budget conflicts. This case study will show how the negotiation between GEII and CSC brings up new ways of accomplishing an agreement for the budget conflict.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case 13.3 Kohel v. Bergen Auto Enterprises, LLC Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2013. 2013 WL 439970. Issue: This case involved allegations of breach of contract involving which parties and for what actions?…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that the auditors in this case, Ernst & Whinney, should have great blame in not having the sufficient information and knowledge to fall into the pressure of the bribes committed by Minkow and analyze the fraud that was occurring. The upper management in ZZZZ Best made the financial information seem perfectly fine, therefore the auditors were unable to identify any miscalculations that would then lead to fraud. Minkow and his company for years kept on staling the fact that his insurance business had an actual positive cash flows system occurring. This would keep the auditors from seeing the main problem concerning the fraud that was started from the very beginning by Minkow and his carpet/insurance business. As this wasn’t enough fake information conducted by…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contracts are an integral part of society, having strong legal contractual principles gives confidence to consumers, investors and anyone who wishes to enter into a contract. Entering in a contract shows that in a primitive way that two parties are on the same page, however it is noted that a high proportion of litigation does actually stem from misunderstood contract (Duxbury (2011)).In this scenario Gary believes he has a valid contract with Mike and is disappointed to learn that Mike has sold on the Bike to Liz (third party). Using previous cases as precedent and analysing the conditions in which a contract is made, advice will be given to Gary on his legal position in regards to the contract and whether there is any suitable remedy that…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From an economics perspective, the market for airport parking in the city of Melbourne would be a monopoly (assuming that this is limited to the parking that is a part of Tullamarine airport). A monopoly is defined to be a market type where is only one firm operating with absolute market power, with no close substitutes and a large barrier to entry. Firms operating in this market are required to have proximity to the airport, with a large area available for cars to park, and the resources to monitor and ensure the security of these vehicle. These factors require both significant capital and government approval beforehand – ensuring that entry into the market is near impossible. As other firms are unable to enter the market, the sole firm operating…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. Personally speaking, coming from a consumer’s point of view, I think that selling Coca Cola through interactive vending machines is a bad idea. Nonetheless, it is a good idea coming from the company’s standpoint. Even though conventional economic theory would say that it is wise for Coca Cola to execute price discrimination to increase market efficiency, dual entitlement theory says otherwise. Since consumers already have a reference price and firms have a reference profit they should stick with, consumers would be upset because they think that the firms are trying to receive extra benefits.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics