Into the Wild Questions
In the first chapter of the book, the tone is very straightforward and unbiased. He says that he tried “to minimize his authorial presence.” As Krakauer begins the Into the Wild, he includes both positive and negative facts and comments about Chris McCandless by people who have met him during his journey. I don’t think that the author is very sympathetic towards Chris because he is so straightforward and doesn’t really show any emotion. Jon Krakauer sees some of Chris McCandless in himself when he was younger, so he knows how Chris felt. I do not think that Krakauer has sympathy for Chris though, because it was his decisions that led him to his death.
Chris McCandless and people similar to him most likely want to hitchhike and live in the wilderness because they want excitement, danger, and maybe to just escape their own lives. Chris was very intelligent and was offered membership in the Phi Beta Kappa, but he decided to decline it because he thought that honors and titles were irrelevant. McCandless donated the remainder of his college fund to OXFAM America, which is a charity for fighting hunger, shortly after he graduated. I think that he did that because he had already learned what he wanted to in college, so why waste the rest of his fund on …show more content…
He was a poet and in Chris’s journal he had many poems, so I assume he liked poems. Henry was also a philosopher and historian and Chris took an interest in philosophy and history during college. He was an abolitionist, which suggests that he had the same determination as Chris. Lastly, Henry David Thoreau was a naturalist and Chris McCandless literally abandoned his whole entire life to live in nature. The reason Chris admired him so much was most likely because he was an inspiration to him and they had the same likes and
In the first chapter of the book, the tone is very straightforward and unbiased. He says that he tried “to minimize his authorial presence.” As Krakauer begins the Into the Wild, he includes both positive and negative facts and comments about Chris McCandless by people who have met him during his journey. I don’t think that the author is very sympathetic towards Chris because he is so straightforward and doesn’t really show any emotion. Jon Krakauer sees some of Chris McCandless in himself when he was younger, so he knows how Chris felt. I do not think that Krakauer has sympathy for Chris though, because it was his decisions that led him to his death.
Chris McCandless and people similar to him most likely want to hitchhike and live in the wilderness because they want excitement, danger, and maybe to just escape their own lives. Chris was very intelligent and was offered membership in the Phi Beta Kappa, but he decided to decline it because he thought that honors and titles were irrelevant. McCandless donated the remainder of his college fund to OXFAM America, which is a charity for fighting hunger, shortly after he graduated. I think that he did that because he had already learned what he wanted to in college, so why waste the rest of his fund on …show more content…
He was a poet and in Chris’s journal he had many poems, so I assume he liked poems. Henry was also a philosopher and historian and Chris took an interest in philosophy and history during college. He was an abolitionist, which suggests that he had the same determination as Chris. Lastly, Henry David Thoreau was a naturalist and Chris McCandless literally abandoned his whole entire life to live in nature. The reason Chris admired him so much was most likely because he was an inspiration to him and they had the same likes and