From fancy soccer stadiums to grandiose buildings – including the $200 million AU headquarters in Ethiopia - many exert that China’s infrastructure projects are not always productive and realistic focus for African citizens. Yet even when infrastructure, like roads and railways are built, others argue that China often leaves their projects in the hands of African officials who either don’t have the capacity or interest in maintaining expensive projects. This trend, however, may be changing, as proponents of Chinese involvement in Africa argue that the Chinese government has positively responded to African governments “harder and better informed bargains” including Angola’s requirement to subcontract 30% of infrastructure projects to local firms
From fancy soccer stadiums to grandiose buildings – including the $200 million AU headquarters in Ethiopia - many exert that China’s infrastructure projects are not always productive and realistic focus for African citizens. Yet even when infrastructure, like roads and railways are built, others argue that China often leaves their projects in the hands of African officials who either don’t have the capacity or interest in maintaining expensive projects. This trend, however, may be changing, as proponents of Chinese involvement in Africa argue that the Chinese government has positively responded to African governments “harder and better informed bargains” including Angola’s requirement to subcontract 30% of infrastructure projects to local firms