Chief Justice Role

Improved Essays
The position of the Chief Justice, currently held by John Roberts, is the most important position in the Judicial Branch of the United States because it serves as the head of the United States federal court system and the chief judge of the Supreme Court. As a result of the importance of the position, the Chief Justice has many responsibilities around the government in addition to his duties in the Supreme Court. In order to fully understand the importance of this position, a study of its roles in the federal government, and the advantages and disadvantages that the Chief Justice has needs to be accounted for. For this reason, only the most qualified and competent judges have the ability to hold such a prestigious position. The Chief Justice of the United States, in addition to all the …show more content…
This power is advantageous to the position of Chief Justice because it accounts for the balance of power by allowing the Judicial Branch to participate in the trial regarding the possible removal of the important office of the President. In addition to presiding over impeachment trials, the Chief Justice is also considered the most senior member of the Supreme Court and is thus responsible for initiating conversation when deciding cases. This allows the Chief Justice have a lot of influence over the other justices. The Chief Justice is also responsible for setting agendas for the court allowing him to heavily influence the direction of the court. Despite the added responsibilities of the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court, his vote is still equal to that of his peers and has no power to overrule the verdicts of the other justices. However, despite this slight disadvantage of the Chief Justice, if he is in the majority opinion, he has the ability to build on his legacy by choosing who writes the majority opinion that serves as a guide for the decision making of the lower courts. This is a major

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the delegates shared a commitment to an independent judiciary. People thought it would be good to have a co equal branch to serve alongside the legislative and executive branches.but delegates did not show up to philadelphia with a fully developed plan for the judicial branch. It has the ability to create courts, interpret the law,determining whether a specific law conforms to the Constitution,and applying the law to specific cases, typically ones that are disputed. john marshall became the fourth chief justice of the united states in 1801. A major influence in his life during the revolutionary war was george washington which was a close friend of marshalls.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power in the Court John Marshall was one of the most prominent members of the U.S. Supreme Court. Marshall is known for producing one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history after his ruling in the well-known case of Marbury v. Madison. During the time he served as Chief Justice, Marshall managed to bring more power to the judicial branch. He did so by working his way up to the highest position in the court, strengthening the unity of the justices, and establishing judicial review.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the nonfiction book by Jeffrey Toobin, he talks about the justice system and the Supreme Court in the United States and how it functions and also how it has changed over the years in history. The book shows a great look at how individuals such as George W. Bush in how they hold their power and how the justice system affects that. Also giving a great understanding with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's alienation. It also touches on the topic of a “fight” of conservatives that were taking control or trying to take control of the supreme court. Despite that there were many more republican appointees on the court it fails in the 80s and 90s.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Robert Jackson Influences

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Robert Jackson was a small town New Yorker who rose to the status of a distinguished lawyer, and later became one of the greatest Solicitor Generals. Narrowly missing the appointment of Chief Justice, Jackson was the final associate justice appointed by President Roosevelt. Jackson welcomed the role of a Supreme Court Justice, and developed a practical view of the constitution. Jackson’s main influence to the court came from the Nuremburg trials, in which he was the chief United States prosecutor. After his time abroad came to an end, Jackson used his knowledge from Nuremburg and “Europe to shape American constitutional law” (332).…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America stands for justice, nevertheless, equality but the Judicial Branch possess an amount power over Congress that overshadows this statement. The Judicial Branch consists of three levels; the District Courts, Court of Appeals and uppermost power, the Supreme Court. Despite the fact that the Senate and Executive branch have the choice of who maintains the position of Supreme Court Justices, the Supreme Court still has the ability to subdue the other branches. Revealed in the United States Constitution, Chief Justice John Marshall’s majority decision, in addition to a 2005 Political cartoon, it is evident that the Supreme Court subjugates the Executive and Legislative Branch.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It established the Supreme Court’s power and legitimacy as a co-equal branch of government (McBride) and shed light on the importance of judicial…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard of the phrase “supreme court”? Well, in the judicial branch of the United States government, the phrase is an everyday thing for them. This is because they work in law and, more specifically, the supreme justices of court. Basically, it’s their job to serve up justice. This type of thing, was what Thurgood Marshall ended up doing for a living.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In most cases, the Supreme Court should have the final voice. Moreover, Supreme Court judges might not always come from privileged backgrounds, but they are almost always over-qualified for the position, and most have served as federal judges. Hudson points to a controversial case in the book, such as the one involving abortion and Texas. The was a case for the state of Texas’ Supreme Court, rather the Supreme Court of the United States. Hudson’s proposal would only overburden the Congress, which already has a lot on its plate.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief Justice Earl Warren Many Supreme Court Justices have left behind some type of legacy. John Marshall for instance, through the Marbury v. Madison case he was able to confirm the establishment of judicial review- the ability of the Supreme Court to limit congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional. In his paper, I will be focusing on former Supreme Court Justice, Earl Warren. This paper explains his early life, law practices, and the legacy he left behind.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president may not unilaterally appoint justices; he may only nominate them, and abide by the Senate’s verdict on them, whether confirmation or rejection. As the constitutional scholar John McGinnis writes, “the very…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There exist differences between a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and a dissenting opinion. Majority opinions are issued when the majority of Supreme Court justices, agree with one another on the conclusion and reason that led them to that conclusion. Concurring opinions are filed by members of the majority who believe something was not mentioned in opinion and must express such thoughts. Dissenting interpretations are commonly transcribed by any one of the justices that disagrees with the conclusion reached by the majority explain the majority were wrong to come up with that conclusion. Both opinions have a differing effect on the state of the law in America.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays