• Home Page
  • Characteristics Of Police Brutality

Characteristics Of Police Brutality

Superior Essays
Show More
The abuse of power happens when citizens aren’t given their rights. As we have all seen recently and since the 90s, police act on their own agenda. According to Bandes, “First of all, police brutality is unlikely to be inflicted on non-minority members of the middle class. One of the salient characteristics of police brutality is that it is largely practiced on poor and minority groups - in part as a way of devaluing them and demarcating them from us” (47). Yes, police have done unlawful things to Caucasian Americans, but a majority of their targets are Hispanic Americans and African Americans, “A growing body of evidence shows that minorities are disproportionately the targets of police brutality, but important theoretical questions about …show more content…
A. (1999, July). Patterns of Injustice: Police Brutality in the Courts. Buffalo Law Review. Retrieved December 7, 2016, from www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic
Clymer,S. (2002, December). Are Police Free To Disgard Miranda. Yale Law Journal. Retrieved December 7, 2016, from www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic
Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona. (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2016, from http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-miranda-v-arizona
Gottsfield, H. L. (2006, December). Is Miranda still with us? Are the police duty-bound to comply? State Bar of Arizona Attorney. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, B., & Hohl, K. (2012). Just Authority? [electronic resource] Trust in the Police in England and Wales.Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Johnson, A. (May 3,2006) "Court affirms importance of rights." The Indiana Lawyer. LexisNexis Academic. Web. Date Accessed: 2016/12/08.
Leo, R. (March, 2001) “Panel three: Miranda’s Irrelevance: Questioning the Relevance of Miranda in the Twenty-First Century.” Michigan Law Review. Retrieved December 11, 2016, from …show more content…
Arizona, (1966) 384 U.S. 436; 86 S. Ct. 1602; 16 L. Ed. 2d 694; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2817; 10 Ohio Misc. 9; 36 Ohio Op. 2d 237; 10 A.L.R.3d 974.
Samuel, E. (October 18, 2016 Tuesday ). Kap’s Voice Heard Police chief apology important first step. Daily News (New York), Retrieved from

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Robinson V. California Case Study
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robinson V. California Case Study

    Question 1 A. 370 U.S. 660: Robinson v. California (No. 554) Argued: April 17, 1962- Decided: June 25, 1962 The case involved Robinson and the state of California. He had violated Californian statute that prohibited addiction to narcotics (Uscourtsgov, 2018). The statute termed it a misdemeanor punishable by any person arrested with addiction to drugs, and, sustained the petitioner’s imprisonment thereunder the Californian courts. The constitutional amendments that were under scrutiny, in this case, were Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Pp.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Rights Dbq Analysis
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Rights Dbq Analysis

    The Miranda warning that arose from the U.S. Supreme Court's Miranda v. Arizona decision assures that officers assure that those arrested are aware of their rights that protect against self-incrimination prior to any questioning. The ruling in Miranda does fulfill the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination and protects against the pressures of authority. The Miranda rights fulfills the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination because they protect against wrongful punishment and torture employed by authorities. Authorities can abuse their power in order to gain info or prove their suspicions correct.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

    Imagine being arrested based on zero evidence to accuse you of a crime and at the very same time being forced to answer intimidating questions that could be used against you. Miranda v. Arizona is an iconic court case that created a large impact on racial discrimination and even how arrests would be made. It started in 1963 when Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona. He was in custody for rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Ernesto Miranda appealed with the Arizona Supreme Court claiming that the police had unconstitutionally received his confessions.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Dbq Analysis
    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supreme Court Dbq Analysis

    The Supreme Court has always made decisions that have had lasting impacts on society. ¬A time period during which this was particularly true was the period between the years 1953 and 1969, when the Chief Justice of the court was Earl Warren. Under his influence, the court made a number of legal decisions that continue to hold significance in American society today. Such court cases include Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966).…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    My Favorite Court Case: Miranda Vs. Arizona Case
    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    My Favorite Court Case: Miranda Vs. Arizona Case

    I choose to do my research paper on one of my favorite court cases in American history Miranda vs. Arizona case. I’m choosing this court case because it brings up two amendments that tend to be overlooked by law enforcement comes around and one of the most well-known sayings. First I will be giving a quick background about those two amendments and then I will start talking about the case. The issues about this case involved the fifth and sixth amendment. Let me explain both of these amendments.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay
    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    Miranda vs. Arizona is one of the most crucial U.S. Supreme Court cases ever held in the United States. The case causes the Supreme Court to redefine law enforcement procedures before interrogations. The decision that was reached by the Supreme Court addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. All of these cases are similar in the fact that there was a custodial interrogation where the suspect was not properly informed of his constitutional rights to remain silent and have a presence of an attorney. Additionally, in all of the cases besides Stewart v. California, the conviction was affirmed without any belief that there was a violation of constitutional rights ("Facts and Case").…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Miranda Rights: The Fifth Amendment To The United States
    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Rights: The Fifth Amendment To The United States

    What do you think about the miranda rights.these miranda rights can also be called the miranda warning. Weah do you think it is important that cops read you your miranda rights. Another good question is what would happen if i did not read you your miranda rights, well if a cop doesn’t read your miranda rights then some people think they can escape punishment. the reason cops read you your miranda rights is if you're in trouble you might want to know what you can do to help your case. However A Cop still has to infer these to you.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona Supreme Court Cases
    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona Supreme Court Cases

    In the early 1960’s four men were arrested on different crimes.. In the police department those men confessed to their crimes without ever being told their rights, mainly that the Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment. The confessions were used in court, and it became a question of whether those men’s constitutional rights had been violated. The question was answered in the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona 1963
    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona 1963

    Miranda vs Arizona 1963 Miranda vs Arizona is one of the most significant Supreme Court decisions in United States history. On March 13, 1963 a man kidnapped a young girl from her job at a movie theater; he then took her to the Arizona desert where he raped her, robbed her and then proceeded to drop her off a few blocks from her home in Phoenix, Arizona. Ernesto Miranda, the convicted criminal, had a long previous record that included crimes such as armed robbery, as well as a juvenile record that included attempted rape, assault, and burglary. Miranda was found shortly after the crimes and was brought in for questioning.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona
    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona

    Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Title Date of Submission Miranda vs. Arizona The Miranda warning has become one of the most common statements used by police officers across all states in America. The court case of Miranda vs. Arizona set precedence in protecting the rights of alleged criminals when taken into custody by law enforcement officers. The ruling rendered has withstood the test of time in restructuring American criminal jurisprudence.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case: Lisenba Vs. New York
    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Case: Lisenba Vs. New York

    Lisenba v, California (1941), Stein v. New York (1953), Gallegos v. Nebraska, 1951), Crooker v. California (1958), and Cicenia v. LaGay (1958) (Hemmens, 2014, p. 22). In another case, Gallegos v. Colorado (1952) the United States Supreme Court ruled that the confection a violation of due process after Gallegos who was 14 years of age at the time was denied his right to have contact with his mother (p. 22). The concerns that the cases cause among the liberal United States Supreme Court Justices consisted of cases displaying tactics by policemen in using psychological methods in getting suspects to confess (Hemmens, 2014).…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona
    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona

    The United States of America justice system operates under the assurance of innocent until proven guilty, granting everyone the right to a fair trial and due process of law. The right to a fair trial is one of the many rights under the power of the constitution that protect and secure justice, freedom, and equality. All American citizens are guaranteed these rights under the constitution, whether they are consciously aware of it or not, as was supported under the supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona, which resulted in the creation of Miranda rights. Miranda rights are imperative in order for due process of law to be upheld, thus ensuring and accentuating liberty. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) was the supreme court case that redefined interactions…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

    Miranda vs Arizona By Bryan Lundgren In this project, I will find out some of the background, information, and the decision behind the Miranda vs. Arizona Supreme Court Case in 1966. I think before I go into the Supreme Court case and decision, I think it is important to know the reason why the case made it to the Supreme Court in the first place.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The People Vs. Larry Flynt Analysis
    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The People Vs. Larry Flynt Analysis

    The People vs. Larry Flynt Americans value their freedom, most especially their freedom of speech and how their Constitution protects such freedom. Speeches like hate speech, speech plus, symbolic speech, seditious speech and the like are part of their freedom of speech. For the purposes of this paper, the film to be discussed is The People vs. Larry Flynt. This paper will also discuss the interrelationship between media, identities, and politics depicted in the said movie. Brief Summary of the Film…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings