The United States of America justice system operates under the assurance of innocent until proven guilty, granting everyone the right to a fair trial and due process of law. The right to a fair trial is one of the many rights under the power of the constitution that protect and secure justice, freedom, and equality. All American citizens are guaranteed these rights under the constitution, whether they are consciously aware of it or not, as was supported under the supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona, which resulted in the creation of Miranda rights. Miranda rights are imperative in order for due process of law to be upheld, thus ensuring and accentuating liberty. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) was the supreme court case that redefined interactions
…show more content…
It does not allow for criminals to roam free, but holds them accountable by just and fair means, and in the most basic form of justice it allows the concept of innocent until proven guilty. “Given the presumption of innocence that is implicit in our constitutional scheme, the rights of criminal suspects and defendants flow from and give effect to that presumption and the rule of law itself.” Both due process of law and rule of law are procedural guarantees that protect against tyranny to allow for liberty. With due process, there are set procedures and expectations, that leave little room for deviation from the law, much like the Miranda warning and the transparency it …show more content…
It is well within the rights of a police officer to use coercion to elicit answers from the accused, but allowing for that small shift in power only ensures greater shifts in power until it's borderline abuse. In past cases such as, Gideon V. Wainwright (1963), criminal defendant, Clarence Gideon, was convicted without ever have spoken to a lawyer despite his demands for one, this oversight in justice and slight against him further prove the importance of miranda rights. The Miranda warning ensures every citizen knows their constitutional rights, reaffirming the powers of the people and their right to know what they legally have to endure and the means by which it happens. This levels the powers of the police with the powers of the accused, keeping a neutral ground on which both have room to exercise their respective liberties. The Miranda warning ensures the liberty of the accused and the police by allowing for the entire police force to operate under a standard, keeping their integrity and liberty intact. “ Requiring adherence to the Miranda warning and the exclusionary rule actually makes the police more careful and thus more likely to sustain a case and secure a
It does not allow for criminals to roam free, but holds them accountable by just and fair means, and in the most basic form of justice it allows the concept of innocent until proven guilty. “Given the presumption of innocence that is implicit in our constitutional scheme, the rights of criminal suspects and defendants flow from and give effect to that presumption and the rule of law itself.” Both due process of law and rule of law are procedural guarantees that protect against tyranny to allow for liberty. With due process, there are set procedures and expectations, that leave little room for deviation from the law, much like the Miranda warning and the transparency it …show more content…
It is well within the rights of a police officer to use coercion to elicit answers from the accused, but allowing for that small shift in power only ensures greater shifts in power until it's borderline abuse. In past cases such as, Gideon V. Wainwright (1963), criminal defendant, Clarence Gideon, was convicted without ever have spoken to a lawyer despite his demands for one, this oversight in justice and slight against him further prove the importance of miranda rights. The Miranda warning ensures every citizen knows their constitutional rights, reaffirming the powers of the people and their right to know what they legally have to endure and the means by which it happens. This levels the powers of the police with the powers of the accused, keeping a neutral ground on which both have room to exercise their respective liberties. The Miranda warning ensures the liberty of the accused and the police by allowing for the entire police force to operate under a standard, keeping their integrity and liberty intact. “ Requiring adherence to the Miranda warning and the exclusionary rule actually makes the police more careful and thus more likely to sustain a case and secure a