Miranda vs Arizona
By Bryan Lundgren In this project, I will find out some of the background, information, and the decision behind the Miranda vs. Arizona Supreme Court Case in 1966. I think before I go into the Supreme Court case and decision, I think it is important to know the reason why the case made it to the Supreme Court in the first place. In March 13th, 1963 the court case began with the arrest of a Phoenix resident named Ernesto Miranda. During this arrest, Miranda was not informed of his rights during the arrest. At the police station, he was identified by the witness. The police then took him to interrogation and was then questioned by two police officers. Two hours later, the officers obtained a written confession signed by Miranda. The statement was a typed paragraph stating that he had made confession voluntarily, without threats or promises of immunity from the police. The document also contained that he had full knowledge of his legal rights and that he understood that any statement he made could be used against him. He was allegedly charge with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Miranda had a history of serious mental instability and unfortunately had no counsel present. At his first trial, the prosecution 's case consisted …show more content…
The three parts of the decision went as followed. The first was the Fifth Amendment privilege (which states that no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury). In this instance, Miranda was basically compelled to be a witness against himself and his confession was obtained in a way that did not meet the constitutional standards. What was also a large factor to this part of the case was that he was not offered or given the right to an attorney to consult with during the interrogation process with the
By Bryan Lundgren In this project, I will find out some of the background, information, and the decision behind the Miranda vs. Arizona Supreme Court Case in 1966. I think before I go into the Supreme Court case and decision, I think it is important to know the reason why the case made it to the Supreme Court in the first place. In March 13th, 1963 the court case began with the arrest of a Phoenix resident named Ernesto Miranda. During this arrest, Miranda was not informed of his rights during the arrest. At the police station, he was identified by the witness. The police then took him to interrogation and was then questioned by two police officers. Two hours later, the officers obtained a written confession signed by Miranda. The statement was a typed paragraph stating that he had made confession voluntarily, without threats or promises of immunity from the police. The document also contained that he had full knowledge of his legal rights and that he understood that any statement he made could be used against him. He was allegedly charge with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Miranda had a history of serious mental instability and unfortunately had no counsel present. At his first trial, the prosecution 's case consisted …show more content…
The three parts of the decision went as followed. The first was the Fifth Amendment privilege (which states that no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury). In this instance, Miranda was basically compelled to be a witness against himself and his confession was obtained in a way that did not meet the constitutional standards. What was also a large factor to this part of the case was that he was not offered or given the right to an attorney to consult with during the interrogation process with the