Furthermore the bite marks that had been on Sabina were analyzed and came inconclusive. They went to two different analyst one said that it matched Roy Browns bite marks. As well as the other side it couldn’t be him because he was missing two upper teeth and it had a full set of teeth on Sabina. Then there was evidence on the night shirt that had DNA on it, but at the time they couldn’t analyze because the technology didn’t exist back then. Soon after that they did analyze and was not Mr. Brown. Next will be the case that took …show more content…
Mr. Brown started to play detective in his jail cell. First off he took upon himself to look at the evidence in the case through the Freedom information law he got the evidence the next day. Next he looked at the biological evidence and noticed that the DNA on the night shirt was not tested. So he asked Mr. Bench if he could have a sample of his DNA and he never responded later they found that he was died. He committed suicide. Mr. Bench had a daughter that gave him some DNA to test to match the one on the shirt. The DNA that was on the night shirt matched the girls DNA 50% which is expected when she is 50% of her dad. After that the innocence project gave the evidence to the court and they dropped all charges against Mr. brown. " The prosecution formally dropped all charges on March 5, 2007."(“Roy