Case Study Of Coulls V Begots

Improved Essays
I. Introduction
The parties involved in this problem are:
1. Benedict the owner of a 9 ha farmland;
2. Adrian the purchaser of the 9 ha land; and
3. Catherine a beneficiary of the purchase price.
The primary issue raises by the problem is one of contract interpretation and the approach should be in accordance with the meaning which the parties actually attached to the words in dispute.¹
Specifically, two issues concern Benedict and the other two parties:
1. Whether Benedict can enforce the agreement against Adrian to purchase his farmland; and
2. Whether the reduction of Catherine’s share of the purchase price was legitimate.
Benedict is likely to succeed on the grounds that Adrian’s cancellation of the contract was ineffective. But he is unlikely to succeed because the requirements for variation of Catherine’s share were not satisfied.
The grounds for discussion are found in the Supreme Court decision in Mana
…show more content…
¹⁵ Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd [1919] AC 801 (HL) at 859.

Catherine can enforce her share given that the High Court of Australia held in the case of Coulls v Begots “it was a promise given to both of them”¹⁶ the party and the beneficiary. It was affirmed by the Court of Appeal decision in Laidlaw v Parsonage that Mr and Mrs Broughton are clearly entitled to sue to enforce promises that Wyatt made to the purchaser in the agreement that it entered into with Mr Wright.¹⁷
A court is likely to find that Catherine can enforce the promise made by Benedict because she is a volunteer to the Agreement. Thus to avoid legal expenses and time consuming procedures, Benedict is advised to honour his promise.

IV. Conclusion
A court is likely to find that Benedict can enforce the agreement because Adrian’s cancellation was ineffective. However, a court is likely to rule that the deduction of Catherine’s share was illegal because the requirements for variation were not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case: Katzenbach v. Grant 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46756 *; 2005 WL 1378976 Facts: The Plaintiffs, Katzenbach and Osuna filed a lawsuit against Defendant Grant over a film and book rights. Grant owns a website called “thenightexposed” (www.thenightexposed.net). The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Law 531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It’s because an oral agreement for land is enforceable if there is partial performance. Sadia accepted the $1,000; therefore, it is an indication that the buyer has paid part of the price and a partial performance has taken place. No signed writing is needed for a specific performance. 10. Assume that in the preceding problem Sadia had sent to Bo a receipt for the $1,000 reading as follows: "January 11.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Question: Is Nick Carraway truly the honest man that he claims he is? Thesis: Throughout The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Nick Carraway states that he is honest, but because of his loyalty to Gatsby his acts and choices are influenced greatly, creating a character who is dishonest and hides secrets no matter the cost.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Goods versus Services. A. ISSUE: Discuss fully whether the contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of goods or the sale of serv¬ices. The contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of services because the Palermos orally agreed to the purchase and installation of the carpet.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mccleskey Court Case

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The issues started when McCleskey, an African American, was convicted of two charges of robbery and one charge of murder and was sentenced to the death penalty. These actions were taken on the account of McCleskey robbing a furniture store in Atlanta, Georgia and murdering a Caucasian police officer in the process, by shooting him with a gun. Later witnesses brought in the gun he used, and one of the bullets that were fired that night. The jury did find him guilty and charged him for the things he did. McCleskey tried to defend himself in court by stating that they were violating the eighth and fourteenth amendment, which both explain things about equal protection rights, and cruel and harsh punishments, given to those who are tired.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1998, Hugh Caperton filed a lawsuit against A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc and was found liable for $50 million in damages in a state trial court in West Virginia. Prior to the hearing, Caperton motioned for the presiding justice in the case, Brent Benjamin, to recuse himself, seeing as though Massey’s C.E.O. had donated nearly $3 million dollars to Benjamin’s campaign. In 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Benjamin’s failure to recuse himself, seeing as he had a personal connection to one of the parties in the case, was a direct violation of the Due Process Clause stated in the fourth teeth amendment (CAPERTON v. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO., INC.). The Caperton v. Massey case proposed the question, “how much power and impact does election campaigning have on judicial bias. Should state judges be appointed over elected?”…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ruth remembers the day she took her daughter, Becky to local Wic office for formula checks, etc. Donald later got call at Music store he’d been working at to come to hospital locally in Inner City. There was investigation opened concerning injuries Becky had received. Both Ruth and Donald realized they had made mistake of trusting the care of their child to others. Becky had received various injuries on different occasions after picking up Becky from sitters.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion of the Court: McCullen v. Coakley The Eleanor McCullen against Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts was a Supreme Court Issue in 2013. In 2000 Massachusetts Legislature created the Massachusetts Reproductive Health Care Facilities Act which stated that a buffer zone will be enforced around abortion clinics to prevent interference between those who are pro-life and pro-choice advocates. The final ruling from the Supreme Court was that the buffer zones did violate the First Amendment.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first case that has established the power of the federal government by Supreme Court is McCulloch Vs Maryland. In 1816 Congress created a bank in the state of Maryland. Two years later Maryland Assembly passed a law to impose taxes on the bank. McCulloch was a cashier at the bank and refused to pay the tax. The Constitutional questions that were being asked Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank?…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frank parked his car in the stadium parking lot. A fly ball landed in a car parked in the lot belonging to Frank. The parking lot attendant (Paul) saw the ball land in Frank’s car. Paul took the ball from Frank’s car and put it in his pocket. Another attendant say what happened and left a note on Frank’s windshield explaining what had happened.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Company X (target) has recently completed a merger with Company Y (acquirer). As part of the merger agreement a shareholder/employee with a 6% ownership in Company X, named Dr. Frederick, from Company X has agreed to give up his shares, work for Company Y, and give up all claims and interests in his intellectual property. In return for his agreement, Dr. Frederick was payed a sum of $1 million. According to the merger agreement, which Dr. Frederick consented to, the $1 million would be allocated as $350,000 capital gain and $650,000 ordinary income treated as deferred compensation. Dr. Frederick and his tax advisors maintain that the entire $1 million should be treated as a capital gain because “He only gave up one asset of any value, his 6%…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The defendant original wanted to sell a farm for £1000; however the claimant made a counter offer of £950. The Counter offer was not accepted so the claimant subsequently tried to accept the original offer. The defendant then refused to honour the original offer. The claimant bought an action of specific performance against the defendant, but was unsuccessful because as soon as a counter offer is made this immediately voids the original offer in its entirety (Duxbury 2011) and the offerer is not bound by the original offer. Nevertheless due to differentiation of interpretation of language and conduct, both potential outcomes must be analysed and then assessed which course of action would be most…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court ruled in favour of the plaintiff on the ground that there must be a legal intention in the agreement between two parties since there were an enforceable provision of Ripely’s assurance and will and a significant financial consequence involved because of the breach of…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    F= Facts: The case title is R.v. Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273. On May 19, 1884 a yacht set sail to Sydney, Australia from Southampton, England. There are four men involved in this case the crew of the Mignonette, Tom Dudley, Edwin Stephens, Edmund Brooks, and Richard Parker. The captain Dudley and crewman Stephens were charged with the murder of the cabin boy Parker.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James, Adjou, Sylvia, Bob and Tim (represented by Ian) require identifying and advice as to the applicability of relevant contract and tort/delict principles to the current scenario presented in the problem question. Before proceeding with advising the individual’s, we need to check the validity of the contract and to establish the note displayed on the car windscreen is “Invitation to Treat” (or) “Offer”. The difference between the two is significant and need to be specifically identify, as the ‘invitation to treat’ cannot be accepted legally and an offer is an expression of willingness to contract on the specified terms without further negotiation and which is legally accepted.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays