What Is Carlos Fuentes Attitude Toward The Native Americans

Improved Essays
1. Carlos Fuentes described the civilization discovered by the European in a way that seems, that the native’s people progression has halted and they needed help from others who are more advance (European). Fuentes mentioned the Eurocentric view of why the native people were not advancing. He said “they [Indians] were blessed by nature, but dwarfed by it,” most scholars believe that the Indians were “lazy,” thus making their civilization backwards compared to the rest of the world. However, that was not the case, the native people demonstrated extraordinary abilities in, agriculture, architecture, mathematics, sculpting, and astronomy. Fuentes explained that the native people believed in divinities that represents natural forces and objects …show more content…
The Spaniards attitude towards the people they encountered was distasteful, they didn’t even give a chance on how a friendly alliance will work. They did not even bother to relate to the people or learn and understand their culture, they went to the new world with one mindset, which is to conquer and impose their ideas and beliefs on the people they encountered. The Spaniards justification for their acts is that, the Europeans has surpassed all other people in intelligence, physical dexterity, and they are the more superior race. Which qualifies them to govern the other parts of the globe. The saw the native people an inferior race, they disrespected them, destroyed their cities, cultures, and monument without consideration.
3. Carlos Fuentes opinion about the conquest was not fully positive nor negative. However, it seems to be slightly positive than negative. He said that the conquest would have been fully negative if something good didn’t come out of it. A few good things Fuentes mentioned that overshadowed the evil of the conquest were new cultures, new beliefs, and a new race (mestizos). He believed that without the conquest, he would have not existed. The native people were civilized enough to survive, but the conquest was destined to happen to take them to the next
…show more content…
The Spaniards dominated the Indians, due to several reasons. The Indians will say they were defeated by the Spaniards, because the confused Hernan Cortes for Quetzalcoatl, a redeemed god who left his people and promise he will return back on the day that coincided with the day Cortes came to the world, so they didn’t fight back. While the Spaniards will say they dominated the Indians because of their superior armament, and war tactics. A bow and arrow was no match for a gun, stones were no match for cannons, and finally horses were faster than humans which was a huge advantage for the Spaniards. Other reasons that might be regarded were disease brought by the Spaniards, the internal division within the empire, and most of the Indians stopped fighting once their leaders were defeated. From a neutral perspective, the Indians should have dominated the Spaniards, because they were greater in size and they fighting in their environment.
7. The impact of the conquest for the native population was not in any way ideal for them. They were forced by the Spaniards to accept their culture, change their lifestyle, and their culture and traditions were diluted. Today, the native people’s language is almost nonexistence, the native race are very few in number and they are isolated by the society. The conquest also cut short the independent development of brilliant civilization or the Aztecs and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Progressive Era Attitudes

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Progressives viewed Indians as just another problem to fix. Although the Progressives had noble intentions, the result of the Progressive policies caused addiction, loss of identity, and countless other problems. Progressive education policy stripped the Indians of their identity, but did not teach them enough skills to be self-sufficient in life. The Indians were stuck in limbo, because they could not return to their roots or move forward.The Progressive policies were so extreme that they were a contradiction to the American founding ideals. The Progressives robbed the Indians of their freedom, and in effect, negated the…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both the Spanish and English alienated the Native Americans and treated them poorly. The English had nothing to do with the Native Americans and lived separately from them. However, the Spanish wanted to take control of them and rule…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since Columbus is a white european voyager sent by Spain during the 15th century, he displays his superiority over the indians due to their lack of knowledge in weaponry and distinct physical features. The indians pagan beliefs opposed his monotheistic religion. As a result, Columbus believed that the indigenous people were savages who needed to be helped. This belief will eventually lead to the Indian’s loss of control over their native culture. Furthermore, due to the exchangement of crops, the Americas was introduced to domesticated animals, particularly, horses, pigs, sheep, and cattle (doc 3).…

    • 1371 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While most successful trade deals are built to be mutually beneficial, this agreement was doomed to fail from the beginning. It appears to me that the Native Americans did not foresee the influx of settlers that would soon be settling in the New World, which indubitably would have persuaded their agreement to the trade alliance. Similarly, the English simply viewed the Indians as means to an end. Through the expedient actions of the English, they sought to benefit from the Native American’s resources without a thought to the moral corruption in stealing land and refusing to integrate or comply with the Indian’s way of life. The salient wrongdoings of English settlers, during John Smith’s absence, truly showcase the categorical and remorseless contempt of the English towards the Native…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Essay On Aztecs

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lastly, trade was impacted negatively because all the populations but one, collectively channeled their energy towards and only towards religion. while trade remained only local, killing their economy off and depriving them from new resources and domestic animals. Aztecs were maybe the only civilization to develop the most in trade than others their Emperor conquered other civilizations, and expanded upon trade. Tenochtitlan was made a Mesoamerican trade center, most likely because he wanted to have new items and ally other civilizations coming there. However, according to Aztecs Economically Isolate and Enemy, they banned trade against Tlaxcalans, taking cotton, gold, silver, cocoa, salt, etc.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the Natives it was unreasonable for excess clothing to be worn given the climate, but because the Spanish believed only their version of society was right, the Spaniards forced the Natives to change to adapt to their way of life. Most Europeans believed that those who did not observe the Christian faith were brutes and that they were dumb, but Cortez believed that the Natives were men and they wanted to be converted so they should not be treated harshly (Doc 6). The Natives would be treated as real men and given freedom, if they agreed to be converted. If the Natives did not agree to this, war would be waged against them (Doc 2). Europeans believed that this would not be a problem, as they believed the Natives wanted to be cleansed of their sins and their savage practice of human…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Culture

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It was appalling to see a nation founded on liberty to act in such phony behavior. In the end, the U.S. excelled in obtaining western land, but failed in the morality issues with the natives. The balance between continental expansion and coexisting with the natives largely favored the whites. The proof was shown in the population of the natives which plundered downwards along with the reduction of their lands. The settlement of the west left natives “psychologically demoralized, culturally endangered,…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Manifest Destiny Rewrite The U.S believed in moving west to expand land and make America better, as a result of this belief, the U.S caused a big bulldozer domino effect. Native Americans felt abandoned and hopeless when they were forced out by the U.S, causing outbreaks and wars. As white Americans pushed through the tribes claiming land and spreading traditions, Native Americans were upset and angry. Although America is a developed country, partially because of manifest destiny, the actions of forcing families out of homes and forcing tradition on people is not a justifiable reason for manifest destiny. Americans used the excuse of manifest destiny to say that forcing Native Americans out of their homes was okay, but it was not okay.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before reading this book I did not truly understand the struggle Native American’s encountered once the government began giving them land to create reservations. Before reservations, I understood completely how our government forced them off the land that was rightfully theirs, killed and destroyed their way of life, and required them to change their cultural identity if they wanted to survive. I had thought that improved when reservations were formed, but I was wrong. The government persistently harassed and took advantage of Native Americans well beyond what I’m sure most of us expected. So I hold an appreciation for their willingness to adapt and change while still keeping their identities intact.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The arguments made for Indian removal were very heartless and mostly economically or politically oriented. They talk about how unprofitable the land is in the hands of the Indians and how “one nation must perish to make room for another”. The arguments made against Indian removal are quite opposite; they mostly made points stating that Indians are humans just like the whites and that it is because of the treaties made with Congress that they have come to “dearly love” their lands. However opposite the arguments may seem, both sides agreed that the Indians were improving. The Natives were not only attempting to create their own government, their people went to school and attended places of Christian worship.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays