She has made 325 million in book sales, a near billion in films and yet she has the unnerving ordinariness of saying 'British girls don 't cry ' when people question the content of her 'Harry Potter ' stories. There is nothing relevant or new to what Rowling brings to the vast literacy table; her integrity is on the chopping board ready to be butchered, it happens every year it seems, like an annual event, yet all she says is 'British girls don 't cry '. Rowling systematically is a shrine to her works, as the juggernaut stops I wonder what else this serene lady could offer her adoring audience, perhaps a shrine to her 'Potty World '. Annual opening of 'Potter Wizardry ' museums across the pond, '3D Potter spectacle corporation ', maybe
…show more content…
I can 't prove anything of course, but does it actually matter? The fact that somehow I could have helped a young Mother living off benefits indirectly; fills me with pride. I see it similar to a Banksy wall painting, except I did it legally and without the council having to paint over the doodles before he became good at his art, he has inspired many. Creativity usually is inspired or influenced by what is around us and even though Rowling lacks in writing talent, her visions and imagination is unquestionably got to be marveled at. I hasten a guess that if Shakespeare was also here today, he would inevitably have the same problem that Rowling is enduring. Proving their works are genuine; except I do know Shakespeare was incapable of writing anything of coherent due to his Opium addiction. Having friends in high places helped his plight in gaining a lot of Dantes works in the late 16th century; he then put his own name on the unpublished pieces. Opportunism, well I feel Rowling can 't hand on heart claim that content wasn 't birthed elsewhere before she read
I can 't prove anything of course, but does it actually matter? The fact that somehow I could have helped a young Mother living off benefits indirectly; fills me with pride. I see it similar to a Banksy wall painting, except I did it legally and without the council having to paint over the doodles before he became good at his art, he has inspired many. Creativity usually is inspired or influenced by what is around us and even though Rowling lacks in writing talent, her visions and imagination is unquestionably got to be marveled at. I hasten a guess that if Shakespeare was also here today, he would inevitably have the same problem that Rowling is enduring. Proving their works are genuine; except I do know Shakespeare was incapable of writing anything of coherent due to his Opium addiction. Having friends in high places helped his plight in gaining a lot of Dantes works in the late 16th century; he then put his own name on the unpublished pieces. Opportunism, well I feel Rowling can 't hand on heart claim that content wasn 't birthed elsewhere before she read