Bailout In Non-Bailable Fence

Decent Essays
BAIL IN NON-BAILABLE OFFENCES
The police officer has no discretion regarding grant or refusal of bail in case of a non-bailable offence whereas the Magistrate has such discretion under Section 437 of the Code. This power must be exercised judiciously. The Magistrate must be satisfied that the release of accused would not be prejudicial to the prosecution in bringing home the guilt of the accused. However, if there appear to be reasonable grounds for believing that the person arrested has been guilty of a non-bailable offence or of an offence which is punishable with death or imprisonment for life, he cannot be released on bail by the police officer.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In order to obtain a warrant one must have a neutral magistrate to determine if there is pc before suspects are arrested. A sworn affidavit to show that the facts lead to pc. And the name of the person getting arrested to satisfy the particularity requirement so the defendant can be identified with reasonable certainty. Officers don’t have to get warrants in homes as if it is an emergency. In this case, once Ray declared that he was going to kill Janay.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bail Rights Certainly, the family of the defendant have questions about the bail system. One question that we often hear concerns the right to bail. Under most circumstances, the individual arrested is entitled to bail. However, a number of factors weigh in on this circumstance.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Heale Case Study

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Justice was balanced to the victims, the offender and society within the case R v Siale [2017] NSWSC. Justice was served for the victim as the offender received a lengthy sentence for the crime committed. The offender gained justice as he had a fair trial in the eyes of the court. Justice was also received for society as they maintain the safety of the community, but also the rehibition of the offender to become a better member of society. Justice was served for each party.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Style of Cause and Citation: R. v. Paterson,(2017) SCC 15 Court: “Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) and Court of Appeal of British Columbia (British Columbia’s Court of Appeal) Facts of the case: Following an agreement with the appellant to affect a “no case” seizure if he surrenders three marihuana roaches. The police make a warrantless search and entry by police into the home of the appellant. Once inside, the police found a bulletproof vest, a firearm and drugs (R. v. Paterson, (2017)). They arrested the appellant and then obtained a tele-warrant to search his apartment, which led to the discovery of other firearms and drugs.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The landmark U.S. Supreme Court case I have chosen to write about is Miranda v. Arizona. This was a case in Arizona where Mr. Miranda was arrested at his home and taken by police into custody to a police station where he was then identified by a complaining witness. Once, he was identified he was interrogated by two police officers for about two hours and as a result to this long interrogation he signed a written confession to the crime. Therefore, once the case went to trial his oral and written confessions were read to the jury. He was then found guilty of kidnapping as well as rape and sentence to 20-30 years’ imprisonment on each count (uscourt.gov. com.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Essay

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The fourth amendment to the U.S. Constitution stated that “individuals must be secure in their households, and in their persons against unreasonable searches and seizures,shall not be violated,and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause,supported by Oat of affirmation, and predominantly describing the place to be investigated, and the individuals/s or things to be seized”(Schmalleger,201). The Fourth Amendment ,is a part of the Bill of Rights, that was adopted by congress, and it came to effective on December 15,1791.The exclusionary rule holds that the evidence illegally obtained by the police can not be recognize in a trial. The The exclusionary rule also stops the government from producing evidence in a trial which was taken in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s shield against illegal…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States a person is arrested when a police officer believes an offense has taken place or is about to take place. In order for the police officer to make an arrest he or she must meet certain criteria they have to adhere to. Probable cause or reasonable suspicion is the legal standard which authorizes a police officer the right to make an arrest, conduct a personal or property search or obtain a warrant. When a person is arrested he or she must be read their Miranda rights. The Miranda rights emphasize that the person being arrested has the right to remain silent and that what they say can be used against them in court.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the scenario, there are three types of people or things involved the police, the courts and corrections. Now with each one of these things someone who works as a correctional officer, a police officer or a judge can use discretion in order to do their job to the best of their ability. However, it is stated that discretion is the power or right to decide or act according to one’s own judgment; freedom of judgment or choice (dictionary.com. n.d.). Therefore, when it comes to a police officer using his or her discretion in order to get consent to search the house versus an actual search warrant would have really changed the outcome of the scenario. The reason for this is because if he or she had search the house with the consent of the suspect…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Rights Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is well-known fact that the release of miranda rights have brought a hard time to America Legitimate law enforcement, because the law required they to inform suspects who are being arrested that they do not have to answer any questions while in interrogation, which largely limited chance of criminal investigator to obtain admissible statements from criminal suspects, that is, this constitutional rights have given the police office a hard time to get a potential suspect to confess to a crime. Therefore, the court have utilized some loophole of Miranda rights to reduce the impact cause by this constitutional rights to law enforcement. these loophole involved voluntary station house interrogation which performs by invited suspect into the station house to talk without against suspect’s willing, and at the outset of the conversation, police usually would tell suspect something like you’re not under arrest and you’re free to leave at any time you want. For example, It’s happened in following cases- Stansbury v. California, Oregon v. Mathiason, California v. Beheler, respectively, and what is usually happen is police would change his or her mind to arrest suspect right after suspect confesses to the crime in oral conversation, and Miranda rights doesn’t get inform to suspect here, because the suspect is willing to be invited by police to station house to have little conversation with investigator under the condition of not been arrest, Therefore, it’s not necessary for…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Police discretion simply means the ability to decide alternative endings. Although it may seem simple, police officers must decide if a need for discretion is needed or not. In law enforcement there is a need for discretion, but it solely depends on time and place. Discretion in the police department can start as soon as an officer leaves the station. Although police officers use of discretion can have benefits to the community.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment is meant to protect the citizen from unreasonable seizures and searches without a warrant. This includes having their homes, persons, and items in their homes searched by police as well as other officials. Following the Amendment, if a police officer suspects that a citizen has is perpetrating or is taking part in a crime, the office has first to obtain a warrant legally.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Being a police officer is a very risky and challenging profession. When performing their duty, they often encounter different kinds of circumstances. Circumstances that are unavoidable but usually preventable if they are armed with proper knowledge and training regarding situation before executing the task, like, when they conduct their search of a person, an automobile or of a crime scene. To have a better understanding regarding what the police need to conduct the search, in this paper, I will discuss and explain the requirements the police need to conduct the search, like the probable cause requirement, the scope of the exclusionary rule, the value of search warrant as well as the circumstances related to the police search. To conduct the…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discuss the main ways in which police officers are personally held accountable for abuses of power. Are these measures effective? Police accountability has been a widely discussed issue from the very beginning of its official establishment under the Metropolitan Police Act 1829. Through the years public trust has been of great importance, as the public is one of the main groups, which the police is accountable to. In this essay, we will focus on accountability on an individual level rather than on an institutional level.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two major roles for officers is the crime-fighting role and the order maintenance role. The difference is how crime is handled. For the crime-fighting role, their approach is more upright by battling and eliminating crime hands on. Another way to describe it can be “kicking ass and tacking names.” For the order maintenance role, they handle crime by tying to prevent before it happens.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As already stated, judicial discretion encompasses the freedom that judges are assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction. The allowances provided by the law to practice discretion mean that personal opinions are usually injected in the making of judgements in the legal system. As such, discretion leads to unpredictability and discrepancies in the issuing of sentences for similar criminal offences. Discretion is a double-edged sword that carries advantage and disadvantages. The advantage of judicial discretion is that it allows for the consideration of the unique circumstance of each case and apply the legal provisions according to these guidelines.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays