What Is Autocratic Power

Improved Essays
The reasoning for why most governments around the world are autocratic is for power. Most governments want complete and total control because it benefits them. An oligarchy is when a few rules over many, an aristocracy has to do with class ranking, having high society making decisions for the people, and totalitarian is having the government have total control and dictation over the people. Countries that use autocratic governments presume that people are not very intelligent and astute to make the best decisions for the country. Those governments like to have the privilege of choosing who gets what, when ,and how. It also keeps the citizen in check and keep them following orders because it is systematic, it is scare tactic. If they people …show more content…
I think people would think it is that way because they do not know how the system works or how to make it work to their advantage. Especially in representative democracies where people get vote for who represents them. In the UK a general election is where people vote for who will be a member in parliament and ultimately represent them until next election. Even though constitutional monarchies and representative democracies are a little different they kind of work the same, in which people hold some power. An oligarchy is where the elite hold all the power and the people have none, yes constitutional monarchies have an elite, but the royal family only has limited power and do not mandate laws. No, I disagree the United States has not developed into an oligarchy. The reason why because we the people still have voices and rights to choose who we want to represent us, the current government and political system might give off the illusion of that it is only because no one knows what they should or are doing. If the United States government has became an oligarchy it is because the people made it that …show more content…
These are just a few of the actions the government does that get people upset, and they should be upset that the government does not have their best interest at heart. The best way to strengthen American democracy is to have a strong America. If the lower and middle class just comes together and realize that there is far more of us than it is of the one percent we could have real political change. So we have to have to vote, campaign, and rally seriously for what we want they have to give it to us. Though it is popular opinion that the U.S. government can do whatever they want they can not because of the people. If we do not not stick together and speak up they will not know what we want. No we should not just complain to each other, but fuss to our local representative but get our voices heard not only on a state level, but even beyond that. When people see that their demands are being met and they have governments attention that will make people have certainty in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    America has always been a nation dedicated to the principles of democracy. Though the government has undergone massive changes in its organization, democracy has always been and hopefully always will be the pillar upon which the government is run. Despite the importance of the people in the governing process, many now think that their elected officials do not represent their interests. The reason for this doubt is that many politicians now take large donations from corporations, which are likely used for political leverage. One is inclined to agree with the people, as politicians continue to favor the interest of big business over those who elected them. By allowing corporations to donate to political campaigns the government has undermined…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are many different types of government that receive power from different sources. Fareed Zakaria wrote an article about the types of governments and how they are being used today called, “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Government is a system that tries to distribute the power fairly within a country. A government that has multiple parties is called a democracy. Different parties represent how the government should be run best for the people. It has been proven in the past that a liberal system protects individual freedom. There is also not one source of power compared to an illiberal system. Everyone will not always get what each person desires in order to satisfy the people’s needs. The great philosopher and creator of the constitution, James Madison, believe that “all men are evil,” so there must be a system to control the temptation that desires more power.…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Governments need the support of their citizens in order to stay in power. Most of the governments try to sustain their power by doing different kinds of propaganda and manipulating their citizens. Those governments think that they need to have their citizens under control and prevent any dangerous movement that is opposing the government, by various techniques. While a few of the governments use force on the people and are harsh to stay in power, most of the governments subtly convince their citizens by falsely promising welfare to them and furthermore affecting their thoughts in various ways to impose their selfish ideas on them.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolute Power DBQ

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Time and time again throughout history mankind has fought for control, for power. As a child, everyone dreamed to be able to single-handedly run the world, to have absolute power. Absolutism, or an autocracy, is when the ability to rule a nation or empire is only given to a single person, with all decisions and actions affecting the country done with the order or consent from them. Autocratic rulers often limited the power of nobles and religious authorities, used military force to expand their nation’s borders, created laws, and distributed justice as it was seen fit (Document 1). Lord Acton, an English historian, had once said “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely.” (Acton Institute: Lord Acton). Shi Huangdi,…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States style of government over the 200 years it has been around in has been quite profitable economically the way the United States has conducted trade has been able to consistently been able to bring in money to help stimulate the people and the government. The United States government when it was founded I personally believe it was the best system in the world at the time with the promes of freedom of religion and to not be presucted for ones own believes it is no wonder it was able to get and keep good momentum the United States has the promes of freedom of believes. The United States government system in its early years left a good frame work for improvement by using the system of checks and balances so that no one person could have all the power and made it so it would be very hard for the government to take away rights from the people who lived in the United States at the time. For the last thing that I think has made the United States government last for so long is the separation of power between the 3 branches of government the executive the legislative and the judicial. The first branch of government is the executive branch the head of this branch…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I feel that the United States as a whole has grown too apathetic towards its own success to really have most people hold any applicable interest in the near-future of the country, and to relate to the models of democracy Hudson discusses in an earlier chapter, the protective democracy where individuals protect their own economic self-interest only seems to work when the country happens to have a strong economy to do so. I felt that protective democracy is the weakest model presented in that reading, along with pluralist democracy, which runs on a dichotomy of relying on interest and lobbying groups to get anything done while still extoling the virtues of ‘rugged’ individualism. This seemed to me to be one of the biggest challenges to the separation of powers, and democracy itself, so far, as interest groups have clearly grown out of control in the United States to the point that we still have groups like Monsanto around despite decades of bad ideas such as DDT, Agent Orange, and the addition of chemicals into everyday food. Interest and lobbying groups are something that I do not believe James Madison could have anticipated in The Federalist Papers, and they have grown large and insidious enough to become a danger towards a just representative government. This is where I believe a combination of the participatory and developmental democracy models would work the best, as there can still be a ‘power elite,’ but the common people create unions and boards to better control and manage non-government institutions that matter to them. Instead of weekly protests on the streets, people would have the opportunity to make a productive change. The workers who are most affected by, for example, a factory closing, would be able to make the best decisions that benefit them before they benefit any irrelevant large corporation. I believe that only then, when the United States is more united and efficient than it…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An oligarchical government is run by a small group of people. In most cases, the small group consists of military leaders, wealthy landowners or royalty. Several examples of an oligarchy include the former Soviet Union, South Africa and China. The United States is sometimes described as being oligarchical in nature because of the positions of power the wealthy hold. Although an oligarchical government is not the most common type of government system, it speeds up federal decisions, generally leads to smarter choices and includes the opinions of more than one person, making it the best form of government.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The actions I would make if I was unhappy with the government is going straight to the source and telling them myself. I would do that because if I am going to the source I can get my point across to them. If that doesn't work I would stop paying all of my taxes until something happened. Like the daughters of liberty not buying tea that was from the east India company and buying tea that was from one of the colonies.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In class, we defined autocracy as a system of government with a single ruler, for example, the Tsar. Autocracy can be beneficial in some instances, such as when decisions need to be made quickly without consulting with a large group of people. Autocracy sometime requires strong leader in order to get things accomplished quickly and efficiently. Autocracy in Russia can be seen as a progressive as: Peter the Great attempts to establish Russia as a great nation through reforms, Catherine the Great’s education reform, and her believe that autocracy is the most suitable for Russia due to its size.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People have their own impression of government and what they expect for their people. Seeing that we, as Americans, vote for the people in our government, I believe our government is on the right path for success. Abraham Lincoln described government well in his Gettysburg Address. A good government must be "Of the people, by the people and for the people.” A government is meant to power citizens so rebellion and disorder is not present. But at the same time, people should power their government. A government that is not linked to its people is a government suitable for catastrophe. The government shouldn’t bring distress to its people; instead, the government should fear its people. A government that uses oppression and fright to power its…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The American state has become an overly complex bureaucracy. The myriad of checkpoints needed to go through in order to get anything done dissuades citizens from participating actively in politics. And participatory governance being a crucial aspect of a prospering democracy makes the problem of kludgeocracy ever the more pressing. The inevitability of this has its roots in the founding fathers’ concern over the limits of a central government and the responsibilities a truly representative democracy should have. Their pragmatism has shielded the American people from many of the overreaches a government can impose on its citizenry, but at the price of turning our government into a kind of a labyrinth. This price, I believe is a steep one. When one cannot easily traverse through their governmental landscape, power gets consolidated into a few key figures and this is one of the fatal flaws of a convoluted system of governance. And though there are a few values to having…

    • 1331 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    United States Oligarchy

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Another potential weakness is that what the Gilens-Page study argues, that the U.S. is an oligarchy, is very far from a new one. The argument was first made through scholarly literature in the 1930s. “If this be democracy, we need not quarrel about names. But whatever the label, the fact remains that for most practical purposes; we are ruled by a few powerful and selfish groups” (Mallet-Prevost 1933, 171). Lastly, the study cannot distinguish which elites, or what organized interests is more effective or influence can achieving its policy aims in contrast to low commoners support.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every nation and country has a way of running itself; a way to govern what is considered lawful and unlawful. In the United States of American, there is a massive controversial debate about whether our democracy is majoritarian or if it is more pluralistic in nature. Some may argue that the mass public, or every citizen in the country, is able to control the government’s actions. Others will state that many groups are able to work together amongst themselves to be able to allow more involvement of the citizens in a majority of the nation’s decisions. Both of these ideas of how our government works are similar in ways as well as different in many other ways. Knowledge of the citizen, interest groups, government structure is a few differences…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the same, any system which does not allow exercising of power from the whole citizen-body and was not a tyranny or monarchy was described as an oligarchy.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Firstly, in an authoritarian regime the economy is quite different from a totalitarian regime, in an authoritarian regime there are private property and private enterprise. The rich and poor are abounding. There is free market and maybe be agrarian property of free market. While in an Totalitarian regime they have no private property of free market. The government owns all means of production and the collective output should be redistributed equally. Secondly the authoritarian regime political system is full of corruption, bribery, cronyism and nepotism while a totalitarian state has advisors to the government who are generally picked by merit/ dedication and their loyalty to the state and party. Thirdly an authoritarian state if you are caught committing a crime you can be exiled, torture, abused, imprisoned or purged. While in a totalitarian regime you are spying on your neighbors, relatives, parents, friends …. They threaten, use torture, imprisonment or death. But, most of the society believe in the ideals of the state and complies willingly. Fourthly, authoritarian leaders consist of Autocrat, dictator, tyrant, despot who rule by force and fear. Monarch who rule by birth right they are mostly royals. The theocrat who rule by divine right/religious authority. Lastly authoritarian regime allows religion while totalitarian regime bans or limit religious organization that supports the state” (Dr. Frederick).…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics