Autocracy Under Siege: By-Product Of Modernization

Brilliant Essays
Bibliography

David-Fox, Michael. “What is Cultural Revolution.” The Russian Review 58:2 (1999): 181-201.

Daly, Jonathan W. Autocracy Under Siege: Security Police and Opposition in Russia, 1866-1905. Northern Illinois University Press 1998.

Harison, Casey. “The Paris Commune of 1871, the Russian Revolution of 1905, and the Shifting of the Revolutionary Tradition.” History & Memory 19:2 (2007): 5-42. This book elaborates on the precursors to Russian Revolution by examining the link between the French revolutionary tradition and the Russian mood.

Mironov, B.N. “The Russian Revolution of 1917 as a By-Product of Modernization.” Russian Social Science Review 56:1 (2015): 79-95. This argues for the idea that WWI was not the only reason for revolution. It demonstrates that progress made by the working class and peasants gave them an increased sense of autonomy leading to their push away from autocracy.
…show more content…
Nineteenth-Century Russia: Opposition to Autocracy. Longman, 1999.

Polunov, Alexander Zakharova. Russia in the Nineteenth Century: Autocracy, Reform, and Social Change, 1814-1914. M.E. Sharpe, Inc, 2005. 87-250. This book demonstrates the change in mentality that was occurring in Russia during the 19th century which would have lead to demands for a more autonomy, staged around the Great Reforms, an obvious precursor to the 1917 revolution.

Preobrazhenskii, Nikolai. “Little-known Aspects of the Russian Revolution of 1905.” trans. David Mandel. Critique 34:3 (2003): 293-314. This article gives examples of the antecedents of the revolution of 1917 through the actions of the Duma, the workers, and the radical parties of Russia in the first decade of the 20th century.

Reed, Christopher. From Tsar To Soviets. Routledge, 1996.

Rey, Marie-Pierre. Alexander I: The Tsar who Defeated Napoleon. Northern Illinois University Press,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    US Honors Pre-WWI

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The news of defeat was unexpected in Russia. There was social unrest, a hatred shown to the military and economic disruption. The revolution of 1905, which included protests from liberals, socialists, workers, peasants, ethnic minorities and even some soldiers and sailors, forced the Tsar of Russia to grant Russia’s first parliament. The Tsar reluctantly granted an elected legislative assembly during the 1905 Russian Revolution.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the period 1855 – 1956 Russia was involved in many major wars, all of which played an important role in its development. With the exception of the Second World War many of the wars Russia was involved led to defeats for them and these defeats exposed the weakness of the Tsar or government in charge. War outlined the flaws in the presiding system and highlighted Russia’s faults, and thus placed a spotlight upon the shortcomings of the Russian leadership. Such pressure prompted the Tsars and other leaders to react and change in order to appease a nation on the brink of an oncoming revolution therefore Trotsky’s statement that ‘war was a locomotive of Russian history’ is true as it led to significant changes such as the Emancipation of the Serfs and the Abdication of Tsar Nicholas.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reformation period of Tsar Alexander II’s reign stapled him in Russian history as the “Tsar-Liberator”. The Emancipation of Serfs, and the Zemstvo reform had a major positive impact on Russia in both economic and political ways. Through the scope of historical perspective, Alexander II is deserving of the title “Tsar-Liberator” for making great advancements in Russia even when it opposed prior Russian culture and norms. The Emancipation of Serfs was the boldest of all of Alexander II’s reforms. To emancipate serfs meant also to work against age long Russian tradition of Serfdom.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When compared to the Spanish and the Portuguese, Tsarist imperialism seems flat-out enlightened, in this respect at least. Lastly, the second half examines the concept of mobility being evident in small scale maps of Siberia, as colonialism made, and or caused, for the movement of Muscovites throughout the region. The structure of the book as a whole through dual themes introduced within it serve to highlight the difficulties of relations between state and society, master and serf, and colonizer and…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autocracy In Russia Essay

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For the first time, workers who were once peasants now had cultural opportunities like evening classes, clubs, libraries, theatres, and mass entertainment, and in addition to that they became exposed to the political ideas of Social Democrats and Socialist Revolutionaries.4 These political ideas were captivating when the working class began to directly feel the crippling effects of modernization and the strains of WW1. Inflation had taken hold of the economy and as prices rose—sometimes tripled—wages remained unchanging, forcing a widespread hunger amongst the working class across the country. “The wretched conditions in which workers lived and their pitiful wages heightened their sense of separateness not only from the government but from privileged society in general,” and made the socialist ideas of regime change all too alluring. The government had a hope of introducing modernization while still keeping a firm hand of control over society, yet the effects of modernization which consisted of industrialization, urbanization, internal migration, and the introduction of various new social classes only served to further dismantle and wash away the autocratic foundations of the Tsarist regime.2 This collapse in the autocratic foundation through a crisis in modernization was the first step to allowing Lenin and the Bolshevik party to eventually gain control of the Russian…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How could a government lead its people if it had nothing in common with them? They refused to give land in rural areas to peasants and decided to maintain the country in the War, which disquieted the people. They believe that “instead of being a destructive force, it seemed [that the Bolsheviks] were the only party in Russia with a constructive program and the power to impose it on the country”…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the final paper, I plan to explore what leads Russian intelligentsia participating in the 1870s-1880s populism movement to use violence as the main form of political struggle. After the failure of nihilism to bring about social changes that addressed the frustrated expectations following the emancipation of serfs, populism took over as the dominant orientation of the intelligentsia. As before, the intelligentsia regarded as their responsibility to improve the social, economic and moral conditions of the peasants oppressed by the reactionary, authoritarian state; but this time, they recognized the revolutionary potential in the peasantry and therefore initiated the "going to the people" movement, during which they, the repentant, privileged…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dramatic downfall of Tsar Nicholas was the ended the Romanov dynasty in Russia. It ended autocracy as a political system in Russia and lead to the creation of the Soviet Union which went on to spark major tensions with the world in the Cold War. This historical turning point shaped much of 20th century history and the lives of over 293 million people. In between this huge political drama and cataclysmic revolution appears a most mysterious and dark individual who has become a legend in Russian history.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Cossacks rode right into the crowd and slashed with their sabres like madmen. A terrible confusion rose. ”(Source E). The awful events of this day marked a change in Russian attitudes, previously the Russian people had view their Tsar as the ‘little father’ a protector of Russia however now he was seen as ‘Bloody Nicholas’ the man who’s institutionalised brutality and incompetency be it directly or indirectly to the deaths of thousands of innocents, it was this shift in attitudes that gave way to anti-tsarist propaganda from the Bolsheviks and a revitalised interest by the Russian people in changing the way Russia was…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peasants made up 80% of the Russian population at the time and although they manly were loyal followers of the Tsar, many supported the Social Revolutionaries as there was a large discontent over land as most of the land was owned by the aristocracy (who made up only 1.5% of the population) and the church. This strained relationship between the Tsar and his people was shown when in 1903 rules on censorship and repressive measures were relaxed, which lead to ‘an explosion of anti-government pamphlets, books and newspapers’ 8 this shows that many people were unhappy with the way the Tsar ruled. An example of the people protesting against the way the Tsar ruled was on Sunday, 22 January 1905, also known as Bloody Sunday. On this day 200,000 protesters who were mainly workers, led by the priest Father Gapon marched to the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg with a petition for the Tsar, all carrying pictures of the Tsar to show respect.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The revolutions in Russia during 1917, particularly the February Revolution, 'grew out of prewar political and economic instability, technological backwardness, and fundamental social divisions, coupled with gross mismanagement of the war effort, continuing military defeats' and the inadequacy of the Tsar and his government. However, whilst it was these factors combined that resulted in the Russian Revolution, the primary factor…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxist Reforms In Russia

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Russian Empire of 1860 was increasingly desperate of reforms and more so the creation of an Imperium was necessary since western historian and soviet scholar believed that the feudal world was becoming inevitable. In fact, researchers such as Smith have shrewdly pointed that within the soviet culture and achievement of reforms of the 1860s; have been less highly valued than in our bourgeois world 176. The great reforms aimed at balancing interests of different social groups – feudalism even though this failed and in fact, capitalism took place. Feudalism was interested in reducing social and economic disparities of the Russian society as well as, addressing the land question.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Peasant Revolution In Russia

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    Knowing that there had been issues with peasant land reform in the past, it’s not surprising that the peasants continued to express hostility at the notion of private land ownership. The result was, by 1917, a central mass of angry peasants increased attempts to control land by the government, and at people who profited from the land without even working it. The Russian peasants did not concern themselves overly with the political conflicts in the cities; they just wanted…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander II’s reforms changed Russia more than any other events from 1855-1905. The most significant of these reforms The Emancipation of the Serf’s freed the people from the land. Serfdom had long been seen as the symbol of the superannuated Russian system holding Russia back from real progress. The emancipation had some significant advantages for Russia: it created a movable industrial workforce, a better military it changed the structure of Society and it abolished it without Civil War or revolution which had happened as a consequence in the West. On paper the freedoms for the people was impressive, in reality little changed for the peasantry.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays