How Did The Tsar Liberator Have A Negative Impact On Russia

Improved Essays
The Reformation period of Tsar Alexander II’s reign stapled him in Russian history as the “Tsar-Liberator”. The Emancipation of Serfs, and the Zemstvo reform had a major positive impact on Russia in both economic and political ways. Through the scope of historical perspective, Alexander II is deserving of the title “Tsar-Liberator” for making great advancements in Russia even when it opposed prior Russian culture and norms. The Emancipation of Serfs was the boldest of all of Alexander II’s reforms. To emancipate serfs meant also to work against age long Russian tradition of Serfdom. Serfdom worked so well for the Tsar because Russia was so backwards it kept the serfs “simple and loyal.” (Pipes 162) This is why reforms and advancements, like railroads and improved …show more content…
The more the serfs saw and became educated the more they would question the monarchy. Serf emancipation started slowly before Alexander II. Nicholas I who ruled before Alexander II set the stage for Alexander II’s reforms by creating the framework in which a republic state could be developed (Hosking 266). Serf emancipation before Alexander II was slow but the movement was still happening. Count P.D Kiselev led the first serfdom abolishment, in which he called for state owned serfs and private serfs to be emancipated. Kiselev’s idea was to define and secure legal rights and obligations for serfs, encourage economic production, ensure each household had enough land for subsistence, improved sanitation and medical conditions. P.D Kiselev even went as far as to reclaim land from the gentry and give it to emancipated private serfs to ensure they would have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    US Honors Pre-WWI

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The news of defeat was unexpected in Russia. There was social unrest, a hatred shown to the military and economic disruption. The revolution of 1905, which included protests from liberals, socialists, workers, peasants, ethnic minorities and even some soldiers and sailors, forced the Tsar of Russia to grant Russia’s first parliament. The Tsar reluctantly granted an elected legislative assembly during the 1905 Russian Revolution.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This caused the serfs to be oppressed and changed the political system because the kings of Eastern Europe were always dealing with internal revolts. None were better represented than the Cossack rebellion in Russia. The Russian tsars dealt with this with for many years. The kings also, like in Western Europe, had complete control of war. This allowed the Russian to end the Cossack rebellion and also wage war in The Great Northern War against the Swedes.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passage B claims that the Edict of Emancipation freed serfs from their feudal duties and allotted land for their needs . Whilst serfs were allotted land for their needs, this tended to be the worst piece of land. They also had heavy restrictions that prevented them from moving as they now had to pay redemption tax, indebted to the state. The statement that the serfs were free was not entirely true. Passage B addresses the impact of Alexander II’s domestic policies on peasants noting that the ‘peasants were incredulous’ The peasants showed their anger at the terms of the edict by rioting as they believed that true terms of the Emancipation had been concealed.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although well intentioned (in regards to modernization), Peter the Great’s attempts at modernizing Russia were futile, thus making him unfit for the title of “the Great.” His attempts at reform affected primarily the nobility, who were a minority in Russia, and scarcely affected the serfs, and left no lasting impression (concerning modernization) on the serfs. An example of how little Peter’s actions affected the majority of Russians is epitomized in his reforms concerning appearance. The majority of serfs were unaffected by this since they were too poor to buy the clothes needed to hold up dress codes or pay the tax punishment given if you did not follow the dress code. This symbolizes the majority of Peter the Great’s reform actions, with…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Enlightenment, everyone’s views were changing; well everyone, that is, who was not in power. Many monarchs and clergy members who had power were fighting this revolutionary movement so that they could maintain their power. Then, in the enemy countries of Russia and Prussia, came along two monarchs whose views and reforms almost changed everything. These rulers were Frederick II of Prussia and Catherine II of Russia and are now coined with the term “Enlightened Despots.” (Ellis, Esler 191).…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gleb Upsensky, a revolutionary non-Marxist socialist, thought lowly of the peasantry because he believed they lacked the knowledge to behave better (Doc 3). As a socialist, Uspensky ideally would want all the people to work together for the common good. When the serfs were free they were uneducated and just were trying to preserve themselves. If they were to receive an education they may realize the importance of working for a common goal of economic stability for a community, as opposed to just providing for oneself. Katerina Breshkovskaia, a socialist, believed education was necessary because it the peasant's desire for knowledge showed they wished to improve and had the capability but needed assistance.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite this, there were a few advantages for Russia that serfdom contributed…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Russian Revolution was a major turning point in Russian history. Destructive, dangerous, harsh, and cruel are words that characterize the Russian Revolution. The Russian Revolution caused major political changes in Russia. The Russian Revolution had many negative outcomes, but it also had some positive outcomes. The Russian Revolution was a failure because there was a loss of many freedoms such as press, speech, and equality.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Catherine II's Serfs

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Catherine II and the Serf Question According to the historian Aleksandr Lappo-Danilevskii, along with Catherine II's self-proclaimed, Enlightened reason, it would seem likely that the political coup that placed her on the throne would improve conditions for the lower classes of society. This is because in her writings prior to accession she had stated multiple times her dissapproval of the oppression of the nobilty over the serfs and a desire for emancipation, and after her accession she had stated that “natural law commanded her to work for the well-being of all people” and she had only “one aim—the happiness of all her subjects. In addition, Danilevskii also wrote that, “Before her accession to the throne, Catherine had expressed views…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many of Alexander II’s reforms appeared liberal in nature, most of them did not turn out so in practice and were simply initiated to promote stability in the Russian Empire. Furthermore, Alexander II was reluctant to relinquish his absolute power. Combined with the fact that he displayed traits of an autocrat from time to time, particularly after an assassination attempt in 1866, these reasons make ‘Tsar Liberator’ an unsuitable title for him. Instead, a better term to describe Alexander II would be a ‘reforming autocrat.’ While, in many cases, he was genuine in his pursuit of reform, his intentions remained rooted to the perpetuation of the Tsarist autocracy.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With a name like Ivan the Terrible, it is hard to deny the possibility of Ivan IV reigning as the supreme absolute monarch. Despite his numerous bouts of psychosis and general instability, he was a ruthless ruler who would achieve what he desired by any means necessary, with absolute devotion to his state and his faith. One of the essential qualities of an absolute monarch is obtaining and maintaining full control of the lowly peasantry. Such a task may seem so simple, but without strict control of the lower classes, any monarchy can be overthrown due to the large numbers and sheer determination of said peasants.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tsarist regime essentially broke its own economy in order to supply its military so it could fight in the in the First World War. Though there were certain sectors of the Tsarist Russian economy that were relatively well developed, or beginning to develop (particularly industry), just prior to the outbreak of the First World War, 'the system into which they fitted was still archaic.' The pre-war economy was underdeveloped and the transportation network was in no way prepared to deal with the strain of supplying the army on the front lines. In fact, 'the scarcity of means of transportation paralyzed all attempts to modernize the economy' as the train lines were miniscule, especially in comparison to the other nations Russia would either be allied with or fighting in the coming…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the first socialist country in the world, Russia had a lengthy and tough time to change and develop the country in 1917. The Russian Revolution of 1917 covers the major events such as the February Revolution and the October Revolution that result in the established of the Soviet Union. The Russian Revolution caused the encounter of labors and people. Their sacrifices and protests eventually made the revolution come true. Since the socialist government overthrew the czarist government, there were both political and economic exchanges occurred in the revolution.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In truly humiliating condition, the servants of medieval backwardness, called mujiks that things considered, could be sold together with the land or lands which were built were. Economical: Russian economy was characterized by the monopoly of land and wealth by a minority group (nobility and aristocracy ) , while most of the population was plunged in utter misery and…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays