However, the movement accomplished nothing: the peasants were utterly unmoved and even turned the students into the police because they took the students as their enemy who were acting against the benevolent tsar. This setback did not disintegrate populism but rather led it to make a curious turn: individual violence emerged as the norm. Attempts of assassinations of government officials and the tsar himself became a common occurrence that unsettled both the urban and the rural society, and such terror was met with the tightened control of the government, countless trials and execution. The political organization responsible for the main violent activities was The Will of the People, especially its executive committee. Although none of the members came from the peasant class and university students (or intelligentsia in the traditional sense) made up the most important part of the participants, they acted in the name of the peasant who rejected them before. This paper will try to formulate a theory within which such adoption of violence can be understood. More generally, it is interested in finding out the conditions under which a privileged class will take up terrorism against the
However, the movement accomplished nothing: the peasants were utterly unmoved and even turned the students into the police because they took the students as their enemy who were acting against the benevolent tsar. This setback did not disintegrate populism but rather led it to make a curious turn: individual violence emerged as the norm. Attempts of assassinations of government officials and the tsar himself became a common occurrence that unsettled both the urban and the rural society, and such terror was met with the tightened control of the government, countless trials and execution. The political organization responsible for the main violent activities was The Will of the People, especially its executive committee. Although none of the members came from the peasant class and university students (or intelligentsia in the traditional sense) made up the most important part of the participants, they acted in the name of the peasant who rejected them before. This paper will try to formulate a theory within which such adoption of violence can be understood. More generally, it is interested in finding out the conditions under which a privileged class will take up terrorism against the