Although the threat of authoritarianism is diminishing all over the world the ideology is always being interrogated, it is however not the case in a majority of the Arab states and the Arab domain. Needless to say, therefore, authoritarianism is designated as a political system that amalgamates and hence concentrates power either in a minority elite group of people or in the hands of one individual ruler. These elite group or ruler nevertheless do not either have the moral authority, ethical standards and is not constitutionally mandated to be the legal representative of the people. Accordingly, the subjects in this nations are limited in exercising their free will and their liberties are curtailed.
Consequently, it stands to reason that …show more content…
Accordingly, it will disparagingly strive to correlate how a majority of dictators use loyalty amongst the subjects to build their empire. The casing point, however, will be the works of Hammoudi. Abdellah Focusing on his country of origin Morocco, his inquiries nevertheless are in both the philosophical and cultural fundamentals of this obstinate authoritarianism. He interrogates the postcolonial era, whereby a majority of Arab societies were ruled by a multiplicity of dictatorial regimes while others were under the yolk of …show more content…
However, Hobbes desires the power of government to be inherent in a single person. Needless to say, this is the form of government that is in most of the Arab world. Although, he cogitates that this form of government to be a more durable and stronger the fact of the matter is that it failed in Russia under Stalin, in Iraq under Saddam Hussein besides Libya and Egypt. He further contends that if power is to be divided, governments would ultimately fall consequently this has not been the case with great federal nations like Germany and the United States of America. He attributes this to his perception that the different factions would inevitably argue (Hobbes and Macpherson, pp. 368-73.). This situation has however been witnessed in so many places where dictators have been deposed and more anarchism has however come to haunt the citizens Somalia, Afghanistan Libya and Iraq are some example just to mention a
Consequently, it stands to reason that …show more content…
Accordingly, it will disparagingly strive to correlate how a majority of dictators use loyalty amongst the subjects to build their empire. The casing point, however, will be the works of Hammoudi. Abdellah Focusing on his country of origin Morocco, his inquiries nevertheless are in both the philosophical and cultural fundamentals of this obstinate authoritarianism. He interrogates the postcolonial era, whereby a majority of Arab societies were ruled by a multiplicity of dictatorial regimes while others were under the yolk of …show more content…
However, Hobbes desires the power of government to be inherent in a single person. Needless to say, this is the form of government that is in most of the Arab world. Although, he cogitates that this form of government to be a more durable and stronger the fact of the matter is that it failed in Russia under Stalin, in Iraq under Saddam Hussein besides Libya and Egypt. He further contends that if power is to be divided, governments would ultimately fall consequently this has not been the case with great federal nations like Germany and the United States of America. He attributes this to his perception that the different factions would inevitably argue (Hobbes and Macpherson, pp. 368-73.). This situation has however been witnessed in so many places where dictators have been deposed and more anarchism has however come to haunt the citizens Somalia, Afghanistan Libya and Iraq are some example just to mention a