Judicial System In Australia

Improved Essays
The judicial systems of various countries operate in such a manner where the fundamental belief of justice is carried out based on the code of law. Since every country is governed by its own set of laws and rules, due process for such criminal acts will not have the same punishment or consequences like those here in the United States. As such, the country of Australia will be analyzed in order to understand how the judicial system and the application of criminal responsibility work.
The Australian legal system is based upon the fundamental belief of the rule of law, justice, and independence of the judiciary (Australian Government: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2012). The formation of the Australian law system itself is derived
…show more content…
The state and territories have independent legislative power in all maters that are not specifically assigned to the federal government and therefore, when there is any inconsistency between federal and state territory laws; federal laws will succeed. The federal laws found within Australia govern the whole country regardless of state and territory jurisdiction.
The country of Australia has nine legal systems with eight as being state and territory systems and one federal system (Australian Government: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2012). The criminal laws of both state and territory are what govern the everyday lives of most Australians. Each of the state and federal systems include three separate branches of the government, which are legislative, executive, and judicial.
Each branch of the government has its unique role within Australia where the Parliaments make the laws, the executive government administers the laws, and the judiciary independently interprets and applies those laws (Australian Government: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2012). As with any legal system, the country of Australia has what they call the High Court of Australia. The High Court interprets and applies the law in Australia and decides the cases of special
…show more content…
Doli incapax is problematic for various reasons as it can be difficult to determine whether a child knew the relevant act they committed was wrong unless it is stated during a police interview or if it was stated in a court of law. In order to prove the truth of the matter, prosecutors have been permitted to lead highly prejudicial evidence that would ordinarily be inadmissible and in essence; the circumstances would no longer protect the child and therefore it would be a disadvantage for the child when they stand trial for their actions. (Australian Government: Australasian Law Reform Commission,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Indigenous Australians are grossly over-represented in the criminal justice system. However, the true extent of this over-representation differs between individual areas. Despite indigenous Australians only making up two per cent of the population, they accounted for over twenty seven per cent of the total prison population in 2014 (ABS). This high rate of imprisonment is not due to indigenous people being more likely to commit crime than other Australians, but rather indigenous Australians are over-represented due to a higher rate of offending and recidivism and also largely in part due to the fact that they have a lower rate of referrals to diversionary programs. This is largely due to the discriminatory practices by the police and the judicial…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comparison and Distinction of the U.S and Nevada Constitutions Xitlali Salas 1 A Comparison and Distinction of the United States and Nevada Constitutions As the foundations and frameworks for a government, constitutions play crucial roles in shaping the way a state and nation are run. While the Constitution of the United States outlines the way the federal government is run and act as the supreme law, each state has its own constitution to lay out the way its own government will run.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mick Gooda, Social Justice Commissioner for the Australian Human Rights Commission, has described justice reinvestment as ‘sensible, practical things that can be done on the ground to make communities safer and reduce offending’. What is justice reinvestment, how does it work, and what are some of the ‘sensible, practical things’ proposed? In March 2010, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, Mick Gooda, explained the concept of justice reinvestment in a speech titled: “Justice Reinvestment: a new solution to the problem of Indigenous over-representation in the criminal justice system’ to the advocacy organisation Australians for Native Title and Reconciliation.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polarising the nation, The Queen v Baden-Clay case demonstrates the extent to which the Australian media can adversely affect the success of legal proceedings. The Australian adversarial system enforces strict rules of procedure, which are imperative to achieve equality and adequate protection in society. Although it is deemed effective, imperfections are evident (Skwirk Online Education, Nd). The Gerald Baden-Clay case highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the criminal justice system through the efficiency of the standard of evidence, rights of the accused, precedent and appeal used within the relentless trial to prove an accused murderer guilty.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Glt1 Task 1

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    TASK1 1. Constituion of Australia 2. It controls the government of Australia 3. Legislative,executive and judicial power 4. Legislative power writes the law 5.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Australia Aboriginal people are far more likely to be arrested than non-Aboriginal people, and account for a quarter of all deaths in custody. It has been said that “the Justice system of Australia still has a long way to go in responding effectively to the needs of Indigenous people trapped in the cycle of the criminal justice system and, more particularly, in preventing deaths in custody (Corrin and Douglas, 2008, p.531). Reasons for this can be attributed to the mistrust of the police, laws around drinking that are seen as unfair by the community, perceived double standards of those working in the police force, the failure of the justice system to implement alternatives to detaining and holding arrested people in custody, failure of police to assess health of people being detained, investigations that seem to be biased and not carried out ethically, and the failure of the justice…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Once you have chosen a case, begin conducting your research. Your research should cover the following details: 1 The individual or group that had their rights infringed—who were they? Olaf Dietrich had his rights infringed. 2 Which right(s) was infringed? How was the right(s) infringed?…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will discuss why the Australian Constitution has separated the legislative, executive and judicial powers. The separation of powers is about preserving our freedom as enshrined in the Australian Constitution. The history of the separation of powers theory will be discussed, also there will be references to weekly reading materials and weekly tasks. Argued will be that the reasoning behind the separation of power is to ensure that no branch of government or an individual has sole power of the government and the country with the checks and balances system being vital to ensure the former statement. Governmental Powers Described In order to understand why we separate the legislative, executive and judicial powers in the Australian…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromised of its own handling of various matters illustrates how the legal hierarchy is an important measure of the Australian legal…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is supposed to give back a voice to the people, and stop any corruption in governments. But the question to ask is whether the absolute separation of power actually exists in the Australian legal system. We can begin by looking at the billing process as a good example…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abandonment In Australia

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Laws in Australia are often created to protect the country from perceived threats from outside of the nation. Australia as a nation has significantly grown in population, allies and fears. Australia’s population growth is mainly due to immigration after the Second World War affecting contemporary Australia. The nation was also able to build itself an image in the international community when Australia was able to have a say in its foreign policies and allies. With a growing population and foreign policies, the country developed fears and threats from the outside community which impacted the way the country is governed during high periods of tension such as the Cold War and now the rise of terrorism.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Legislative Branch which encompasses the House and Senate. They make the political and financial decisions to establish laws. The President and approximately 5,000,000 workers are part of the Executive Branch, who enforces the laws of the land. Finally, the Judicial Branch that involves the U.S. Supreme Court and the Federal Judicial Center. These two systems work to apply the laws made.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to support this idea, the history of the Australian legal system should be discussed. Australia is a common law country and the history of the Australian legal system stems from English common law system.2 Common law is judge made laws that are created based around areas that are not included. The judges are required to interpret legislation if there is a dispute about the meaning or how to apply an Act in a case. These interpretations then become part of the common law.3…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On 1st of January 1901, the Commonwealth of Australia was formed when six partly self-governing British colonies united to become states of a nation. The Australian Constitution was then created to treasure the rules of government for this new nation, which outlined how the Commonwealth government was to function and what issues it could pass laws on. Our nation is often referred to as ‘federation’ because the Constitution created a ‘federal’ system of government. Beneath the federal system, power was distributed between a central government and individual states. In Australia, power was divided between the Commonwealth government and the six states of government.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays