The Crucible: Ignorance vs. Wisdom Religions have a hand, in that, of completely blinding that of communities. In fact, some communities have completely changed that of their morals, to better accommodate to that of their chosen religious beliefs. As such, these communities have trouble in differentiating between that of being reasonable, and of, being unreasonable. Bringing this farther into a confrontation is that of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. Through that of his characters, Miller expresses ignorance, and of how, it can make a group go against that of rational thinking. Thus, also causing that of death, and or pain, of others. Out of all of Miller’s characters, Reverend Parris, Judge Hathorne, and Deputy Governor Danforth
…show more content…
As such, when Parris is in court, he tries to convey that John Proctor works for that of the Devil, as he finds it odd that John only goes to church, on Sabbath Day, once in a while. Despite being told by John, of his need to “plow… [his] land,” and to take care of his “three children,” on Sundays, Parris, overlooks it as him being adulterous with that of his Christian faith (Miller, 509). In contrast, Hathorne and Danforth, do not believe anything that goes against that of a prosecutor, in a trial. This is because they feel that no one should lie, while in court, as it is the “highest… providence” possible (Miller, 506). Subsequently, when John Proctor, Francis Nurse, and Giles Corey, try to prove the girls of lying, about witchcraft, Danforth and Hathorne do not believe anything said, and or mentioned, by them. In fact, as a response, Danforth says that he has “not the slightest reason to suspect the [girls] may be deceiving [him],” while Hathorne, calls their accusation, on the girls, as being a direct violation, and or “contempt,” to that “of [what] the court” stands for God’s good will, to provide complete honesty coming from that of the prosecutor’s mouth (Miller, 509/513). Occasionally, religious beliefs can hurt that of other people, while either intentional or not. In the case of Parris, Danforth, and Hawthorne, this is
As such, when Parris is in court, he tries to convey that John Proctor works for that of the Devil, as he finds it odd that John only goes to church, on Sabbath Day, once in a while. Despite being told by John, of his need to “plow… [his] land,” and to take care of his “three children,” on Sundays, Parris, overlooks it as him being adulterous with that of his Christian faith (Miller, 509). In contrast, Hathorne and Danforth, do not believe anything that goes against that of a prosecutor, in a trial. This is because they feel that no one should lie, while in court, as it is the “highest… providence” possible (Miller, 506). Subsequently, when John Proctor, Francis Nurse, and Giles Corey, try to prove the girls of lying, about witchcraft, Danforth and Hathorne do not believe anything said, and or mentioned, by them. In fact, as a response, Danforth says that he has “not the slightest reason to suspect the [girls] may be deceiving [him],” while Hathorne, calls their accusation, on the girls, as being a direct violation, and or “contempt,” to that “of [what] the court” stands for God’s good will, to provide complete honesty coming from that of the prosecutor’s mouth (Miller, 509/513). Occasionally, religious beliefs can hurt that of other people, while either intentional or not. In the case of Parris, Danforth, and Hawthorne, this is