Aristotle's Examples Of A Mean And Two Extremes

Improved Essays
This is Aristotle’s biggest contribution in ethics. Using the example of a mean and two extremes, he focuses on the necessary attributes to maintain balance between feelings and actions. For it is in them that there can be excess or defect. Virtue is concerned with various feelings and actions, For example, feeling pain, anger, compassion, fear, pleasure, confidence and more. To feel them when we ought to, and as we should, is the mean. Vices are extremes, it is either excess or defect. To which virtue then, is a state of being. To exercise deliberate choices, to determine by reason, to choose in accordance with the mean.
There are two main types of virtues: The Virtues of Characters and the Virtues of Thought. These virtues are about our
…show more content…
These refer to emotions and actions, relationships with other people, and the goods that occupy our lives. The mean refers to the middle position of two excesses, it is the moderation in things and is always referred to in terms of an emotional response or a type of action, also what we do with these. Virtue is the mean between two vices (the middle position which is just right), the disposition that we develop within ourselves, our character.
A person is good when they have certain virtues are character traits. What makes a person good? They are good when they have certain virtues: honesty, generosity, bravery, courage, etc… Aristotle believed that there are cases where a person knows what the right thing to do is. Not necessarily that they will always do it.
The mean is not the same for everyone, there is no mean for every act. Virtue can be defined as the “fulfillment of humanity’s distinctive function and as the mean between extremes. Each virtue is a product of the rational control of the passions.” The mean could be considered as being the right amount. (the righteous thing).
Reason or desire determine personal rationality. We may see the problem yet habits are hard to break, and these can become so strong that they becomes excuses for why you would want to do something. Virtue is something important and Vice is something bad, something to be
…show more content…
There is a distinction between acting in an appropriate way as opposed to mastering knowledge. A good citizen would know what the right thing to do is, and how to do it. Again, not only knowing how to identify it, but also knowing how to go about doing the right thing. The ultimate goal is happiness and the role of the state is to provide the proper channel to be able to achieve this.
Man is by nature a social animal. The state is a natural entity. It is not created, it is simply a natural thing. It is the organization between groups. Now, being a good citizen is not just having a right, being a good citizen is one who participates, who is actively involved. Aristotle recognized they were different kinds of states. He held that the basic qualification was a person’s ability to take their share in ruling and being ruled. A citizen has the right and obligation to participate in the administration of justice.
In order to be a good citizen, one must be able to recognize vices and focus on the mean. On the virtues that guide proper system of state. They must be adept to determining the right thing to do and come up with the right way to do it. A bad citizen is guided by personal interests, and though may be able to identify what the greater good is, might choose to let themselves be guided by vices or other interest that would not necessarily benefit the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Is it the golden rule of treating others the way you would want to be treated? Acting on impulse because it feels good? Or doing your duty because it is your “job” to do so? One cannot determine what is "right" and what is "wrong"; it must be taught or shown to us by means of common sense and unified agreement. At the same time, influence of the self- its own interests, wants and needs- play a bigger role in what creates ones ' moral standpoint.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By emphasizing the importance of character traits, Aristotle gives humans credit that they can be good people performing activities because of their character not just because of rules they ought to follow. The only weak point in the theory is the reliance on virtue being essential to happiness. It fails to consider that everyone is different, unlike character traits/moral virtues which can vary from person to person or culture to culture. If the ethics of virtue applied all of its components more universally, realizing that everyone is different and that some virtuous people are not happy and some non-virtuous people are, it would make a more sound…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essentially, virtues are habits by which one acts only for the sake of that which is good. Aristotle views virtuous actions as those that represent correct reason. By Aristotle’s definition, virtue is the mean between the two extremes of excess and defect concerning a feeling or action as a practical and intelligent person would determine it (Kemerling). For example, the virtue of pride is the mean between the excess of vanity and the defect of humility. However, it is important to take into account that a mean is directly related to the individual and the circumstances; the level of pride varies for a politician, a sports athlete, and a military officer.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The concept of virtue is complex both in theory and in practice. Philosophers have and continue to try and define it as well as offer advice on how to live a virtuous life. Aristotle states that the virtuous person feels the right thing at the right time. Contrastingly, Kant explains that the virtuous person is in the process of self-perfection and is bound to have affects. That mirrors Tangney et al’s theory that the virtuous person is guilt-prone and guilt, as well as other moral emotions, lead to virtuous actions.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Virtue

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Whereas, a continent individual acts according to virtue and does so for the right reason but his desires are wrong. A virtuous person desires and actions are aligned along reasonable motives leading to happiness. On Aristotle view continence is sometimes a necessary evil. According to him, the need for continence is something that goes with…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, it is possible to reconcile them in some sense. In my opinion, Aristotle’s idea that happiness depends on the character but also that happiness is objective not subjective, is one of the complementary elements of Parfit’s theory of objective list. Parfit’s theory ignores the agent’s character and his or her will by claiming that objective goods can benefit people independently of their attitudes toward them. Since having the goods in the list without awareness does not provide the best life to that person, character should be counted as an important element of the best life. Also, in the list of goods there are some goods about the character and these goods are not contingent, they should be gained by the agent.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While the main motive of consideration for the utilitarian is the consequence of direct actions, the people are the primary object of consideration in the virtue theory. . The Virtue Theory claims that an action is good if it 's chosen by a person based on virtue and bad if chosen based on…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this essay I will agree with Hursthouse 's statement. I will discuss virtue ethics as a valuable moral theory and explore the influence of Aristotle. I will highlight some issues with virtue ethics, provide some possible responses, discuss the other two leading theories in normative ethics (Deontology and Consequentialism) and then finally compare all three theories together. According the Hursthouse "A virtuous agent is one who acts virtuously, that is, one who has and exercises the virtues... A virtue is a character trait a human being needs for Eudaimonia" Virtue ethics is a moral theory that endorses the importance of an agent 's character and their virtuous attributes. This differs from other moral theories such as Deontology which…

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue ethics focuses on the moral character of an individual. It is said that by practicing virtuousness one can achieve arete, or human excellence, and eudaimonia, or true human flourishing. By bettering one 's humanity and living their life purposefully and meaningfully one can live the “good life”. Whereas consequentialism focuses on the consequences of acts being good or bad and deontology focuses on rules about the acts themselves, virtue theory brings the individual 's personal character and morality into question as to whether that person is acting out of goodness or badness. It would seem that consequentialism and deontology would be better used for broad and complex situations and virtue theory for more personal and simpler ones.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, if one were to overreach the mean via the emotional action ‘fear’ they would receive the term coward. These capacities, with the help of the vices are what motivate and push us in the right or wrong direction for one to practice and achieve character virtue. Thus far, we have learnt that through virtue of character principle is preserved whereas vice corrupts it. Simply put, virtue is all about pleasure and pain in addition to, or as a response to our actions and feelings. It is also known that although we’ve talked about ‘study’ in the context of learning, in the end it leads us to wisdom - “which studies eternal and necessary truths concerning nature and reality...”(NE…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays