Aristotle

Improved Essays
1. How does Aristotle evidently define the term “form”?
Aristotle defines the term “form” by connecting the fact that all substances are comprised of form and matter, and will always occur together. He also states that form is the essence, or ousia, of substance itself and can also be defined as shape, structure, order, or simply the making of what something is. Finally Aristotle defines the term “form” by stating that it cannot exist independently and can be distinguished from content only in thought and never in fact.

2. Explain Aristotle’s concept of the Golden Mean.
Aristotle had an interesting approach in describing his concept of the Golden Mean. He believed that a mean was a midpoint between two other points and characterized moral virtue as a mean between too little and too much. In other words, Aristotle’s mean was located between deficiency and excess. For example, dullness would be a deficiency, well-roundedness would be the mean, and wildness would be the excess.

3. Explain Aristotle’s theory known as hylomorphism.
Aristotle’s theory known as hylomorphism is based on the idea of matter and form. In other
…show more content…
Aristotle had several notable ideas such as the Golden Mean, reason and logic, and his main interests were based on metaphysics, science, and ethics. For Plato, he came up with ideas such as the Theory of Forms, Platonic Idealism, Realism, and Platonic dualism, and focused his main interests in epistemology, justice, virtue, politics, and education. Focusing on the idea of forms, Plato believed that only Forms are truly real and that objects of sensory perception were copies. Aristotle believed that forms exist within the natural order and cannot exist independently. Overall, although Aristotle was troubled by Plato’s teachings, he was influenced by him and carried his ideas and thoughts onto the next renowned

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    1. What is the problem of change and how does Aristotle answer it? The problem of change is essentially the fact that when something comes to be, it is a thing or an object. However, it is uncertain what the initial object was and we are offered two options.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Prime Mover

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Matters without its characteristics and uniqueness cannot exist by itself anymore, but we can still conceptualize it as pure potentiality. For example, if we go to a pregnant woman’s MRI and look into her stomach and see an embryo, we automatically see its potential of that embryo being a human being just like us. Because every potential something (emrbyo) is an actual something (human being), then bare matter can no longer exist by itself. However, Aristotle believes that it is the potentiality of that bare matter itself in every individual substance in which ensures permissibility that individual substance change and evolve. All change consists of a dominant substance which goes through a change losing one characteristic while in the process gaining another.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Form Of Roundness

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In his dialogue Timaeus, Plato discusses the nature of the physical world as well as its purposes and properties. He claims that since nothing becomes or changes without some cause, then the cause of the universe must be a demiurge or god. He goes on to claim that since the universe is fair, this shows that god looked to the eternal model in order to create it. According to Plato, god needed to look at something in order to create the universe and the eternal perfect world of forms was his template. In another one of his dialogues, Parmenides, Plato claims that the forms are self existent as well as eternal.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After defining the three principles of nature in previous book and the term ‘nature’ and in Book II, Chapter 1, Aristotle now explains the sources of change . In Book II, chapter 3, Aristotle gives four causes (explanations) to explain why change occurs. The four causes according Aristotle, are: material cause, formal cause, efficient cause, and final cause. Aristotle tells that for understanding individuals and any changes they undergo, we need first to “[ know] their principles” (194b,line 22-25) which can be done through knowledge of each four causes. The four causes provide an explanation about the individual.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pale By Aristotle

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Aristotle is interested in the discussions of primary beings and essences as an objection to Plato’s philosophy, which I will discuss various interpretations of it in this paper along with Aristotle’s account of essence and at the end, its plausibility. Aristotle begins book VII of the metaphysics by discussing substance. He believes that substance is the primary form of “being” without qualification. By “being” he means; what “something” is and its quality, quantity or anything else predicated in this way (3).…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, most major scientists, inventors, writers, and political figures of the past have been reported as being extremely excessive or majorly deficit in their expressions. Those individuals placed their focus away from socially accepted moderation and amazing things were produced as a result. Overall, Aristotle’s Golden Mean is a good concept but a difficult one to put into…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is the only way I could see the forms standing outside of the particular object t it made reference to According to Aristotle the nature of reality is substance; the subjects of predicates and yet not the predicate of anything. These substances also predicate time, as there needs to be something there that is changing or marking the change. We can predict characteristic on primary substances, but such things as the raw materials of substances are not in fact substances until they take the form of some larger concept. He further states that a substance can be equated with its essence. The “substance without matter” or the concept or idea the substance is associated with holds the essence of the substance then.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To a certain extent, Aristotle is similar in his philosophy to Mill, Aquinas, and Kant, but now completely. He also believes in a universal good in order to achieve happiness in life. According to Aristotle, mortality and good is understood in terms of a whole life. Contrary to Mill, Aquinas, and Kant, that understand moral obligation in terms of human individual actions, instead of examining a whole lifetime. According to Aristotle “good” can be found in many forms.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Explain what Socrates means by the Ideas or Forms of things. What kinds of Ideas or forms exist? The ideas or forms of things according to Socrates, pertains to the concept on how or why an object was created. Socrates defined these forms or ideas according to its creator and its essence.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    matter allows us to account for sensible substances in ways that neither the Pre-Socratics nor the Platonists and Pythagoreans could. By making a substance “something yet again,” Aristotle allows us the ability to dismiss the problems faced by Plato (in reference to accounting for a form’s ability to change), and also the issues of infinite regresses faced by the Pre-Socratics. However, form and matter themselves are not “things” in the same way that a substance is a thing. Form and matter are different ways of talking about one thing (form and matter become the attributes of a sensible substance), and in this way they (when compounded) are one thing with different aspects. As we will see with the next candidate, the definition of a substance…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean can be found in his works referenced in the second book of his Nicomachean Ethics. Though the doctrine seems to be simplistic at face value, it’s complexity is quite intriguing. I believe that Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean doesn’t truly help us make particular moral decisions because of how vague it is. Yet, it guides us in our approach to the moral decisions at hand.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of Aristotle’s function argument is to determine the function of the human being, in order to identify the true human good. The role of the argument in Aristotle’s investigation is to eliminate typical natures belonging to living species and determine the characteristic that is most unique to human life, which is ration. Then stating how human function is an activity of the soul, Aristotle uses his elimination method to state that in order for the human function to be performed well, that it must act in accordance with ration. It is useful to understand the concept of function as it applies to human beings because without it, we would not understand how it connects with our virtues and human good. Virtues, as Aristotle describes them, are best when they are complete and self-sufficient because we are pursuing them for no other reasons but themselves.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Form Of Beauty Essay

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato repeatedly says the Forms are ‘one’. Each Form has just the one property of which it is the Form: the Form of beauty is only beautiful (and the only thing which is only beautiful). However, Plato also suggests that each Form is good, and that the Form of the Good is the Form of Forms. Furthermore, Plato attempts to give full accounts of each Form that explains what it is. For example, in The Republic, Plato argues that justice is doing one’s own job (433a).…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Plato’s allegory of the caves suggests that there are two things that separate the physical from the metaphysics. What’s deemed physical for example is what we can touch what is sensible to us and able to live. The physical is the realm of becoming. On the other hand, what’s prescribed to be metaphysics is something that is beyond physics. Metaphysical is simply is something you cannot touch.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays