Aristotle Research Paper

Improved Essays
Aristotle was an important Greek philosopher from the Socratic period and one of the most important founding figures in Western Philosophy. He was the first to create a comprehensive system of philosophy, which included Logic, Ethics, Aesthetics, Politics, Metaphysics, Logic and Science. Aristotle was very concerned with science and the natural world. Some of his major works were the syllogism, the categories, the 4 causes and his work in the field of natural science. The purpose of the essay will explain the purpose of logic, the roles of the categories, the syllogism, and the 4 causes and relate them all to his works in the field of science. Aristotle defined logic as “new and necessary reasoning”, new because it allows us to learn what …show more content…
He uses the syllogism as a method to a scientific explanation or to answer why questions (i.e. why something occurs?). The syllogism is a logical inference still used in deductive reasoning. It is clearly valid as the requirements that if the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. The most commonly used example of a syllogism today is “Socrates is a man, all men are mortal, socrates is mortal”. This follows the simple argument form is A is to B and B is to C, so A must be to C. The socrates syllogism may answer the question “Why must socrates die?”. The three types of syllogism are dialectical Syllogism (the premises are already broadly understood as is the conclusion), Eristic syllogism (flawed in either information of logic), and Demonstrative syllogism (utilizes true and foundational premises to draw a previously unknown conclusion). Demonstrative syllogism has the most validity in inference and argument …show more content…
Aristotle used the categories to describe all the possible kinds of thing which can be the subject or the predicate of a proposition. The first and most important of the categories is substance, which describes a thing in its true nature. Different types of substance would be particulars such as form, matter, actuality or potentiality or in the the kind, species, or type of thing. The following nine categories are considered the predicate of things. The predicts are qualities, properties and attributes of the substance. Aristotle uses the categories as a logic to describe what exists in the world. Aristotle uses the categories to give specific properties to secondary substances (i.e. man, horse, mammal) and attributing the properties to primary substances (i.e. a man, an oak tree, a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While Aristotle’s belief was, you can only gain true knowledge through the senses, this making him an empiricist. Although the ideas are different, they both seek universal…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle is the most important person in history due to his significant and long lasting contributions to human knowledge. Aristotle is most importantly known for tutoring Alexander the Great, founding his own school, and his impact on today’science. Aristotle is also referred to as “The First Teacher” in Arabic philosophy and “The philosopher” in the West. Aristotle was born in approximately 384 B.C. in Stagira Greece. Aristotle enrolled in Plato’s Academy and proved to be an exemplary scholar.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher believes that by our nature, we are meant to aspire to a life of excellence and that we are rational and social animals that have habits of thought and feeling. Aristotle believes that we should adopt ways to continually have a well rounded…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated before Aristotle was a master of categorizing, and during this chapter Heinrichs takes time to discuss Aristotle’s most valuable ideas: the division of…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    State two differences between Aristotle’s conception of cause and the modern one. There are several differences between the conceptions of causation in regards to Aristotle and our modern day views. One of which is the facts that the Greeks did not necessarily distinguish between causation and explanation. To them, causation and explanation were one in the same. In our modern view, causation is seen as a relation between two events.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Prime Mover

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Matters without its characteristics and uniqueness cannot exist by itself anymore, but we can still conceptualize it as pure potentiality. For example, if we go to a pregnant woman’s MRI and look into her stomach and see an embryo, we automatically see its potential of that embryo being a human being just like us. Because every potential something (emrbyo) is an actual something (human being), then bare matter can no longer exist by itself. However, Aristotle believes that it is the potentiality of that bare matter itself in every individual substance in which ensures permissibility that individual substance change and evolve. All change consists of a dominant substance which goes through a change losing one characteristic while in the process gaining another.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Four Causes

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For each situation there are many possible causes some are inherent in the creature or object itself while other causes are external to it. According to Aristotle in his book, Physics, there are four categories of these of causes; material, formal, efficient, and final. These categories of causes are defined at II.3, 194b23-41. Aristotle states that we use cause in four ways.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 2: In his Aristotle’s Categories, he presents the thesis, “if the primary substances did not exist, neither could any of the other things exist (2b7-8).” By this, Aristotle means that there are two categories of substances--primary substances and secondary substances. Readers must keep in mind, however, that the qualifiers of primary and secondary were only added for clarification purposes. The term I will soon define as primary substances is what Aristotle is referring to when he says substances.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates is a philosopher who had spent his life trying to obtain the external wisdom and rational understanding required for dwelling in Hades. Likewise, he had spent his life philosophizing, studying and approaching other people. Although he heard voices and had dreams during his childhood, Aristotle understood the meaning of his purpose when he started questioning the wisdom of other people. His journey led him to the conclusion that really the god is wise and that human wisdom is worth little or nothing. Also, he realized that he was the wisest because he realized the fact that whatever he did not know, he did not claim to know, while others claimed to know something which they did not.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Unlike his mentor Plato, Aristotle believed that the essence of all beings is Substance. Substance is the first principle of all things, according to Aristotle (VII, 1). The philosopher defines substance as that which cannot be predicated, but that “of which all else is predicated” (VII, 3). Everything else, such as matter, qualities of the matter, and etc., proceed substance. And in order to come to these conclusions about the essence of the world, Aristotle uses the methods of scientific inquiry, experimentation, and deductive reasoning.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle takes it that bodies (more specifically, natural bodies), which are taken to have life in them, are generally considered substances (Aristotle 412a12-14). More strictly speaking, a body that has life in it is a substance in the third sense—they body is a compound (Aristotle 412a15). Here one might immediately question how or why it is that Aristotle’s distinction between substance as matter and form, and even more so how potentiality and actuality could apply to body and soul, in order to characterize living beings as the third composite understanding of substance. Granted, one the face of it, the application seems a bit implausible.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    152). A universal truth cannot differ from what it is; hence, theoretical wisdom is the same for everyone. Meanwhile, practical wisdom is concerned with particulars. Aristotle elaborates on this when he writes, “each particular being ascribes practical wisdom in matters relating to itself to that thing which observes its interests well” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 156). Aristotle is saying that each individual has its own sense of what is practically wise based on its own interests.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To a certain extent, Aristotle is similar in his philosophy to Mill, Aquinas, and Kant, but now completely. He also believes in a universal good in order to achieve happiness in life. According to Aristotle, mortality and good is understood in terms of a whole life. Contrary to Mill, Aquinas, and Kant, that understand moral obligation in terms of human individual actions, instead of examining a whole lifetime. According to Aristotle “good” can be found in many forms.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of Aristotle’s function argument is to determine the function of the human being, in order to identify the true human good. The role of the argument in Aristotle’s investigation is to eliminate typical natures belonging to living species and determine the characteristic that is most unique to human life, which is ration. Then stating how human function is an activity of the soul, Aristotle uses his elimination method to state that in order for the human function to be performed well, that it must act in accordance with ration. It is useful to understand the concept of function as it applies to human beings because without it, we would not understand how it connects with our virtues and human good. Virtues, as Aristotle describes them, are best when they are complete and self-sufficient because we are pursuing them for no other reasons but themselves.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle was a Greek philosopher and one of the greatest intellectual figures of Western history. The views of Aristotle are particularly significant as the structure of his thought process had an enormous influence on the economic and social attitudes of people within the high to late Middle Ages. To Aristotle, ownership was the foundation of a stable social order as the satisfaction derived from the accumulation of items owned and from the sharing of private property acts as a positive trigger to good government. Land or belongings owned by a person or group that is kept for their exclusive use is private property. To Aristotle, property is a part of the household, and the right to acquire property is a part of managing the household as…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays