Aristipus And The Pursuit Of Happiness Analysis

Decent Essays
A(i). Aristippus thought like a modern and his definition is what most people today would think happiness means. He believed happiness was moment to moment. Aristippus viewed happiness as a state of mind, therefore a private value. It was private because pleasure was in your head, you your self knew if you were happy or not. It was very different from public because it was not out there for people to see if you were doing well. He thought no pleasure is better, yet he believed bodily pleasures were better. Moreover, he believed we should seek certain types of pleasures.
A(ii).Aristippus thinks that real happiness is simply a lifetime of accumulated pleasures, but even though he says that he thinks we should pursue particular pleasures. Aristippus
…show more content…
Even though, Aristippus believes that real happiness is a lifetime of accumulated pleasures, he doesn’t believe rational calculation is an essential part of the pursuit of happiness. Aristippus says we should not calculate because it takes us away from the moment. Aristippus believes that pleasure is a moment to moment thing. He thinks we should not sky hop through life trying to see how we are doing because that takes away from the pleasures in life. Aristippus says accumulation of pleasures but he also says that counting or looking at your pile is tiresome, so you should avoid that. Basically, he is saying that you shouldn’t think about it just let it come to you. This demonstrates that he is a strong believer in living in the moment because he thinks calculating will itself distracting from living in the moment. It makes sense that he is against calculating because he believes in immediate gratification and that pleasures do not differ. Moreover, it goes along with his theme that you shouldn’t wait because there is nothing better then the pleasure in front of …show more content…
The example was with pepper plants in the backyard that were planted, had water, and because of they looked healthy. Then, there was other plants, pepper plants as well, but they were left out in the sun and because of it they were all shriveled up. If we looked at the shriveled up plant and the plant in the backyard we would know that the one in the backyard is doing better because we know about plants and what they are supposed to do. That relates to human nature or eudaimonia because we have to know more about humans to know if they are actually doing well. Moreover, whatever it means they are doing well is the species value. The species value for human beings is the goal of all human beings to live

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This theory implies the fact that happiness can be achieved through multiple aspects of life and that each new situation has the opportunity to either enhance or diminish a person’s happiness levels rather than Aristotle’s view that happiness either exists or it doesn’t. Epictetus stresses that things in the world do not have the power to disturb humanity but rather the judgements that are placed on these things do. Happiness mainly stems from how easily people can recognize what is under their control as well as how they react to situations that they can encounter. Unlike Aristotle’s theory, Epictetus’ view on happiness seems to be one that most people can easily attain happiness as the highest good with. This is because Epictetus is correct in his statement…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being realistic assures you that you’ll achieve your goals by working hard, therefore making it possible to accomplish them. Being realistic makes you determine what you can or can’t execute in life, to do the impossible not the unbroken. For instance, the movie, “The Pursuit of Happiness” describes this realistic method. The main character in this movie starts off as a poor man with his child who was abandoned by his wife.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I will be comparing and contrasting Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ view of human happiness, and using these theories and views, examining if bodily and external goods are necessary to happiness, and to be able to back up why it either is or is not necessary. The two had many similarities, and differences that can be expanded. The Stoics believed our happiness was based off one thing entirely, and that is virtues. Aristotle breaks down how happiness is the highest possible good.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness as by Aristotle means, “happiness depends on ourselves”. Aristotle felt that happiness was the central and reason to humanity. As well not just happiness but Aristotle had another thought, “virtue”, as explained in class virtue, meaning to have good morals and also good character. Being happy through ones lifetime, having good health, having healthy relationships and also being well off financially, having good knowledge and so on.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dalai Lama’s perspective of humanity, purpose of life and idea happiness can be compared to the Cyrenaics’s school of philosophy which was established by Aristippus of Cyrene (435 – 356 BCE). Aristippus was a pupil of Socrates, but had adopted a very different philosophical outlook, teaching that the goal of life was to seek pleasure by adapting circumstances to oneself and by maintaining proper control over both adversity and prosperity. Aristippus’s school of thought propounded that the only good is positive pleasure, and pain is considered only evil. They postulated that all feelings are momentary so all past and future pleasures have no real existence of an individual. Dalai Lama also strongly deduced that enjoying life at the moment…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    His goal is set forth an idea that we have a duty to not harm them because they have inherent value. Taylor provides us with a bio-centric outlook on nature, which he believes that if a person understands and implements the elements, then the person will understand that the only moral attitude towards living things is out of…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Living By Epictetus Essay

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophers have pondered the meaning of life for millennia. Some say that the meaning of life is to find happiness, or to flourish. But what is happiness? A stoic named Epictetus goes into great detail to explain how one should find happiness. In theory, living by Epictetus’ guidelines of only worrying about things you can control would be worth it and make you flourish; however, it is impossible to do so because human nature causes us to focus on things that are out of our control.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In philosophy there are many stands to take when it comes to a view of topic shared and discovered by many. Specifically, there are three philosophers that have differing ideas on the role of pleasure in morality, Aristotle, Kant, and Mill. They share and clarify their positions through a plethora of titles and information that will help a reader gain a better understanding of the role of pleasure in morality. Though each philosopher has their own share of ideas of what the highest good represents, they all believe in morality being the search for the highest good. Aristotle begins with his description of happiness as fulfillment of all desires, in accordance with compliance of virtue.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The view of happiness as well as the role that pleasures and desires play in achieving happiness can be seen throughout Western philosophy. Detailing a hypothetical dinner conversation between Aristotle, Epicurus, Hobbes, and Epictetus, will such an understanding be described. In such an account, I will be detailing: what issue/s each guest would raise; what thesis would each defend, and how each would respond to the other; as well as who is most likely to disagree with whom and on which points, and who, on the other hand, might find allies or sympathizers. Each philosopher defines/views happiness differently. Aristotle defines happiness as an activity of the soul in accordance to virtue and reason.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle argues that certain things or conditions must be present to attain happiness, and in that “a certain sort of being-at-work of the soul in accordance with virtue” is required. I will argue that, for Aristotle, happiness cannot be the same as pleasure. However, we will see that happiness is importantly related to pleasure and pain, both in that the virtuous person comes to desire and finds satisfaction in acting virtuously, and in the sense that many of the virtues of character deal specifically with how we respond to our pleasures and pains. Since happiness is a certain way of being at work with virtues, Aristotle speaks of “virtues as pertaining either to thinking or to character”. Aristotle argues that all actions should point toward some good, as without virtue one cannot be happy, as the ability to be virtuous is unified within a good…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5). Aristotle introduces the concept of happiness in relation to the motive and purpose present for decision-making and choices. Happiness is associated to the good that ‘choice’ and ‘knowledge’ partially…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle states even though the translation of eudemonia can be unclear to the English translation we stick to this idea of happiness to our well beings. Understanding what happiness truly is, is key to this idea of how it should be applied to our day to day lives. Dictionary.com gives a definition for the term happiness. Happiness is “characterized by or indicative of pleasure contentment or joy.” Even though this definition displays the characteristics of being happy it doesn’t give us what it truly means to be happy.…

    • 2041 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one hundred people, were asked what does it mean to live the good life, no two responses would be exactly the same. Even though everyone’s response would be different, many of the responses would most likely include being happy. Similarly to how people’s responses would differ if asked the original question, everyone would have their own definition of what happiness means to them because certain words mean different things to different people. Many of the authors that were covered in class talked about happiness and its relation to the good life. The authors that gave the most insight into their view of happiness were Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that pleasure and pain are imperative in the moral life. My main reason is that in order to live a moral life you must be morally virtuous, which involves pleasure and pain which are always paired with actions and feelings. The crucial importance of pleasure and pain and its role in the moral life are statements that are more likely to be true then false. Research Aristotle was a very influential philosopher who focused on the happiness principle and all that happiness entailed: “The Nicomachean Ethics”.…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays